Olympic Stadium : Our best weapon to remain in North London.

Discussion in 'The New Stadium' started by Frenchalex25, Jan 23, 2011.

  1. Frenchalex25

    Frenchalex25 Active Member

    Messages:
    582
    Ratings Received:
    +532 / 6 / -1
    Dear All,


    This has been quite a long time i haven't posted but this gonna be quite of a long post on the most spoken subject at the moment amongst Spurs Fan.
    I wanna give you my opinion as a foreign Spurs fan (french but member of the swiss spurs fan club).

    For the last few weeks, this Stadium problem has turned very much into a “only London geographical problem” and everything was only about we are “North London and should remain it”.

    I do not say location of our future stadium isn’t the (main) part of the problem but this is not the only point to focus on in my opinion.

    To be fair, I am not a “pro-Straford” or a pro “Remain at WHL” but from the many lectures I did on the subject (on sc, on the internet and papers); It appears that the are good and bad points for each option and they have been explained many times on this forum.


    I ‘d like to start my analysis by taking the example of one of us ( Spurs fan) who wrote an email to one of the member of the Haringey Council ( a woman but I do not remember her name ) and post his first email and her answer to him a few days ago on SC…
    He asked her, her opinions about our Club and his views about the future of our Club in the Borough.

    She told that Spurs remaining in the Borough was very important and full part of North London and blah blah blah…
    That answer from her was in complete opposition to what has been done so far by the Haringey Council to show the Club that remaining in Haringey was really important.
    Any time, the Club wants to do something, (especially planning permission) the Haringey council seems to be against it.
    Accept it and remain in tiny WHL………..and accept the fact not be given the right to grow as a football club is NOT ACCEPTABLE.
    Contrary to Newham Council (and already given proofs of which help will be given to West Ham ) if the get the OS.

    As for the Haringey council, they didn’t do anything and told anything trying to convince Dani Levy that the best option would be to choose the NDP over the O.S Option.
    Haringey Council doesn't even seem to be scared the Club to leave the area whereas this area from North London seems not to be the richest part of London......

    Do not get me wrong but what did they do (or tell) to retain us from trying to get to the Olympic Stadium ???????????????????


    Here is the main thing and main argument of my reflection.

    THE OLYMPIC STADIUM IS OUR BEST WEAPON TO HELP US TO REMAIN IN NORTH LONDON IN A BIGGER STADIUM.

    Here is my way of thinking.

    The club THFC has already submitted several planning permissions to Haringey Council
    (that matched very much the demands of the Haringey Council) and have all been rejected so far.
    Furthermore, it seems that we have to make a global planning permission (the Northumberland Dvlpt Project with Hotels ; private homes , and improve public transport facilities to our costs) to have a chance to see one day a still too small 56000 seater Football stadium?
    Maybe we have to pay for all major work to be made in London to get a new stadium once…..????
    You would be impressed by the the numerous clubs that already have a + 55000 stadium.But I’ll develop the point that a 55000 seater stadium would still be too small to allow each spur fan who want to see his team play in an other post.

    It seems very very difficult for the Club to deal with Haringey council despite the fact the Club has done much effort to fulfill Haringey ‘s demands-

    I fully understand Dani Levy now wants things to move on and his will to try to get a B solution( which now seems to have turned into a A solution ) because it doesn’t seem at all to get anything from Haringey Council until THE TIME THERE ARE REAL PRESSURE ON IT.


    AND THE OLYMPIC STADIUM IS THE BEST PRESSURE WEAPON WE CAN PUT ON THEIR HEAD.
    I FULLY BACK D.LEVY TO PUSH ON THE WIN FOR THE USE OF THE OLYMPIC STADIUM.THIS MIGHT BE VERY USEFUL TO ADD SOME POWER IN THE NEGOCIATIONS WITH HARINGEY COUNCIL TRYING TO REMAIN IN NORTH LONDON.

    So let’s ‘ go to win the Bid for the OS and then Levy to meet The Haringey Council and him to tell Them (the Haringey members).
    “It’s all about you now”.
    “ Do you really want Spurs to remain in North London”.
    “This is now time to prove it”.
    We want to remain in North London but you haven’t done much for the Club so far, did you”.
    Seriously think about it , speak together about it and give me a call very soon to speak again about the way we'll build our new big stadium".

    I know this is pure fantasy but I’d like Levy to say something like that if we win the Bid for the OS.
    I have the conviction that we have to go for the win for the WIN FOR THE O.S as this will be our best weapon to put pressure on Haringey council to get some (financial) help form us.

    WINNING THE BID FOR THE OS IS THE ONLY VIABLE SOLUTION IN ORDER TO SEE THE NDP & OUR BIGGER WHL TO GO ON.

    This will be a perfect way to put the Haringey Council to take the right decisions…………….
    And starting to see them shitting their pants………….
    The other thing that worried me is the huge cost gap before The OS and the NDP.
    Haringey will also have to pay for it, as Spurs seems to be a major economical force in this part of London with several hundreds (thousands) of jobs that will stay (or be created) in this area.

    And it would be crazy and SUICIDAL to ask the Club to pay for everything.
    AND THERE PUTTING THEM THE GUN ON THE HEAD (WITH THE O.S IN LEVY’S POCKET) WOULD FOR SURE “HELP” THEM TO UNDERSTAND OUR ARGUMENTS …..

    I am sure i gonna have a lot of stick for this one but i thought this was important..to give a slighly different view...

    Thanks for reading (even partially).

    Alex
     
  2. MattyP

    MattyP Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes

    Messages:
    13,861
    Ratings Received:
    +2,491 / 46 / -12
    Thanks for the post Alex - the more the merrier in the debate and I hope what I about to write doesn't stop you from commenting again on this - it's not meant as a criticism, but as a response to some of the points you raise.

    We have been given planning permission by Haringey, which has been approved by the Mayor and the Secretary of State.

    Haringey pushed this through in about two years, compared to about five for the Emirates / Islington.

    Haringey has agreed for s106 contributions at £16m (basically funding all develops have to pay to local services in order to gain permission). That isn't the deal breaker in the funding of the stadium and we would in any case have to agree s106 funding with Newham if we took the Olympic Site.

    Haringey have approved in principal to grant us Compulsory Purchase Orders on the property we do not currently own.

    Therefore, to pin any of the blame on Haringey is, I feel, a little on the harsh side. They have a budget of about £400m to spend, in an age of cuts I cannot see how it is justifiable to expect them to contribute to a private company's development.

    If you want to apportion blame on anyone, apportion it on CABE.

    They are the ones who objected to us building 434 flats on the development and as a result the second application was reduced to 200.

    This is one of the largest, if not the largest, causes of the project costs going up £50m compared to the first application.

    But otherwise, good post.
     
  3. mattdefoe

    mattdefoe Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,310
    Ratings Received:
    +888 / 119 / -24
    we will not grow as a club or gain success without a new stadium, lets just make the move we will still be tottenham by name location otherwise, we havent won shit all in my lifetime and have won our national league TWICE,
     
  4. BigRed

    BigRed lost somewhere Staff

    Messages:
    7,323
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 0 / -0
    CABE are one of those quangos that have to put up opposition to everything that comes their way in order to justify their existence.
     
  5. mattdefoe

    mattdefoe Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,310
    Ratings Received:
    +888 / 119 / -24
    half of my post dissapered, im am very 50/50 on the move im worried if we move.
     
  6. Hoowl

    Hoowl Dr wHo(owl) Staff

    Messages:
    6,513
    Ratings Received:
    +233 / 4 / -0
    If half dissapeared, did you post end up as completely pro stratford or completely against it?
     
  7. SpurSince57

    SpurSince57 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    45,214
    Ratings Received:
    +8,480 / 265 / -139
    Has anyone found CABE's reasoning for reducing the number of flats? The other modifications they suggested to the original design were all pretty sensible, and certainly improved it. Isn't that why the plc consulted them over the design?

    And, whilst CABE's support for the application was desirable, it wasn't essential; they criticised certain aspects of the Immigrants' design, but Arsenal and Islington Council simply ignored them and went ahead.
     
  8. Donki

    Donki Has a Massive Member Member

    Messages:
    8,331
    Ratings Received:
    +8,055 / 140 / -43
    If public opinion is anything to go by we wont get the OS and when you look at it logically you have to say what we plan to do does seem daft. The stadium was built for the Olympics, running track, facilities etc as part of a legacy project. Publicly funded to be a landmark in history in what ever form it was to be in after the Olympics there is no way we will get it IMO.

    I dont mind what we do but we need a new stadium no matter how much I luv the Lane.
     
  9. EmperorKabir

    EmperorKabir SC's resident legend.

    Messages:
    5,070
    Ratings Received:
    +36 / 5 / -0
    This has been obvious all along. The only thing is that at first, it looked like an obvious ploy, but now it looks like a serious ploy.
     
  10. MattyP

    MattyP Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes

    Messages:
    13,861
    Ratings Received:
    +2,491 / 46 / -12
    CABE's response to the first application

    And on the second

     
  11. Sanj

    Sanj Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,639
    Ratings Received:
    +966 / 23 / -1
    If we were to win the vote for the OS would we not be committed to the stadium - both financially and ethically after all the hullabaloo over who gets the stadium?
    For spurs to then turn around and not go-ahead with the stadium would be a HUGE publicity own goal and i wonder how the contract to take over the OS would be financially structured if we were to renege from the deal?
     
  12. mattdefoe

    mattdefoe Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,310
    Ratings Received:
    +888 / 119 / -24
    im really not sure , my first part was indicating how I have seen no spurs success and now we are close to some It would be amazing to see it, and this stadium would force success.

    However I was going to add having not seen much success its all I know and either way im tottenham whether bad or good.

    I think a stadium would turn us from good to the elite, but why cant we just keep it in NL, im confused . surely the revenue would pay for the price of the stadium.
     
  13. SpurSince57

    SpurSince57 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    45,214
    Ratings Received:
    +8,480 / 265 / -139
    So, in layman's terms, the original flats would have been poky little broom-cupboards you couldn't swing a cat in and no-one in their right mind would want to buy, still less actually live in unless they happened to be absolutely desperate. Will the potential selling price of the redesigned 200 be any less than that of the original 424? Individually, you'd expect them to cost more, although they would still qualify as 'affordable' housing.
     
  14. ThorntonSpur

    ThorntonSpur every away game is a home game

    Messages:
    2,392
    Ratings Received:
    +621 / 62 / -22
    One thing is true 56000 is not big enough nor is 60000.

    a POINT ON S106 MONIES.

    Under new rules due to be implemented money does not have to be spent on the surrounding area. the council fio they wish can have the money used in say wood Green if they wish.

    in fact the money could go into a bigger pot and not neccessarily end up being used in haringay at all.

    in west yorkshire for example the talk is of a combined fund for all five authorities to pool thier s106 monies to improve transport facilities across the region.
     
  15. Shanks

    Shanks Kinda not anymore....

    Messages:
    29,070
    Ratings Received:
    +11,623 / 227 / -41
    I'm with the OS move now. Hope it happens.
     
  16. mabolsa_ritchey

    mabolsa_ritchey aka Hugh G Rection

    Messages:
    1,122
    Ratings Received:
    +180 / 0 / -2
    One thing Im confused about is the whole "we wont grow as a club if we dont move to a bigger stadium, lets move to the OS" mentality.
    Have the club completely given up on the NDP? If we lose the bid we're not gonna bother with the new Lane?
    To me it feels like in some quarters itll be"Oh we lost out on the 60,000 stadium, now we'll only have a 56,000 stadium in the pipeline. We'll never compete!"
     
  17. Misfit

    Misfit Magnificent bastard.

    Messages:
    18,251
    Ratings Received:
    +22,868 / 162 / -80
    I think the percieved wisdom is that the NDP stadium is going to be plonked direct into Stratford instead of the WHL site. Why some, not all, just some, seem so keen (to my mind anyway) is that this can all happen magically for £200m less (effectively halving the debt - easy peasy this developing stuff isn't it) and therefore all this lovely money will be pumped straight into the first team almost instantly and propel us onto the same plateau currently occupied by Real Madrid, AC Milan and all the other giants of world football. It's an absurd notion, frankly.

    We don't have £200m to pump into the first team currently but after we've spent £200m odd on a new stadium in Stratford, we will? I'd love that be explained.

    All this does (and this is a good thing no doubt) is lessen the debt. And make us East-Londoners. So, pros and cons.
     
  18. spursgirls

    spursgirls SC Supporter

    Messages:
    12,472
    Ratings Received:
    +15,501 / 64 / -21
    Levey and Sugar on Sky Sports News now to talk about it all.
     

Share This Page