- Aug 27, 2013
- 13,456
- 39,042
I don't miss it at all.All this science these days. How i miss a bit of "Just fucking runaround a bit" philosophy
I don't miss it at all.All this science these days. How i miss a bit of "Just fucking runaround a bit" philosophy
None of those players are strikers and we've needed a striker since Soldado stunk out the place, and even beforehand.
What have we done about it?
Identifying good strikers isn't the problem, fans can pick the best strikers in the game so obviously all the clubs can as well. The problem is the best striker's go to the richest clubs. This even applies to up-and-coming talents these days like the Brazilian kid City have just signed, so we have to take a punt which means we're not buying the finished article, we are signing young players that required development. This isn't ideal but it's what we can do.The only other way we could do it would be to sign an older top striker on the way down but again they'd likely be on huge wages.
True, but the way I look at it is these players have three stages:
1. Talented and attainable, playing for an average team and doing well but a bit raw
2. Move to a better team, establish themselves in a good league
3. Move to a top team
We should be signing them at step 1 and I think we're trying to buy them at Step 2.
Michy Batshauyi is a classic example of that.
We were interested in him the summer he went to Marseille but it seems that somewhere along the line the player identification system in place didn't have the courage in its convictions or, more likely, was busy chasing a player in Step 2 (who probably ended up at City, United or Chelsea).
To me that suggests a problem somewhere in the chain.
(With Suarez we know that problem was Mr. T. Sherwood!).
Yeah that's true but I think that's what we try to do. In fact what you have described is what we've done with Janssen. And that's causing all kinds of criticism.
Possibly our choices haven't been great in this respect but only time will tell but that also applies to Batsuayi who hasn't proven anything either yet. I do agree he looks a better bet than Janssen does so far but that doesn't mean long-term that's going to be the case. It's always a gamble. Even signing Lacazette would be a gamble. There is an argument that he would be less of a gamble than Janssen as he is currently a better player. But the huge fee and huge wages give a counter argument that it's more of a gamble.
I think the game has changed from the days we picked up Berbatov. And when Liverpool signed Suarez. Both signings we made largely unchallenged I don't think that would be the case these days.
It was fucking tongue in cheek comment FFSI don't miss it at all.
Regarding Janssen, I agree. I think he'll turn out to be a dud but his stature is about right for the wages we offer. I'd question the fee and also why the scouts were so confident in him after only 6-7 months of goalscoring in the Eredivisie, but that's being picky as both arguments could be swung either way.
He also might come good, who knows.
However it's clear that we still waste time shopping in places we can't afford and - van der Vaart aside - it's never got us anywhere in recent times.
On final thing, I'd be fascinated to see which players were on the list after Batshuayi and Janssen. Would be very interesting to see our striker shortlist from the last 5-10 windows too.
I think Martial and Werner were on the list for the pacey wide forward option, which we filled with Son.Well we know we were after Ings, Martial, Werner, Berahino for a start.
Mate, I know, but we haven't signed a decent goalscoring player since Adebayor in 2011. It's not about having a 100% success rate.
They tend to be players who command a high premium, that's why we struggle to get them because their wage exceeds our budget.
Well we know we were after Ings, Martial, Werner, Berahino for a start.
True but if you've got a good scouting network in place that is geared towards a certain model of player acquisition (buying less expensive, but less proven/more raw talent) then we should be able to find a few in 5 years.
As mentioned, Janssen might be that guy and in terms of that particular deal it felt like what we should have been doing all along (i.e. buying someone talented but quite raw). It's just weird that it took us so long to actually do that sort of deal, and I suspect it's because Levy thought he could be clever and kept failing to get more unobtainable targets. The hole in our squad in attack has been an ongoing joke (even with us fans) for a long time.
We have a good scouting network in place, I just think it's very difficult to buy a ready made goalscorer who's equipped for the Premiership, those that are are normally snapped up by the clubs with more wedge, that's not our fault really. Apart from Benteke who is a rare breed who could we have realistically aimed for which fits our budgets and our squad composition?
I don't disagree with you that we can't afford a bonafide top class player who is proven enough to come in and rip it up straight away, but I'm not arguing that.
I'm saying we could have signed someone raw, cheaper, less proven but talented when we had Adebayor, Soldado and Kane on the basis that the player wouldn't have to come in and smash it straight away because we had options in the squad to allow us to develop him (BUT, crucially, knowing that Ade would be off soon and the question mark over Soldado might not go away).
Instead though we stood there with our dick in our hand for three years chasing players we were never going to sign and when we finally do make that sort of young, unproven signing, we have only 1 striker in the squad.
So instead of allowing the kid (Janssen) time to develop, he is thrown in at the deep end and being absolutely slaughtered left, right and centre for not being a top class Premier League talent from the off.
Hopefully that makes my point a little clearer.
There's a tough middle ground for us targeting PL proven for us though.Premiership tested is the key word.
Actually two words.
Lamela Soldado Janssen all needed time to settle.
Of the 'magnificent 7' none of whom had Prem. experience
only Eriksen and Lamela came good.
and Christian's in a football world of his own
The rest have came and went.
Wanyama, Toby recent successes had exactly that.
The lust for exotic foreign stars is misplaced.
There's a tough middle ground for us targeting PL proven for us though.
A) It's expensive most times and some clubs may just flat out refuse to sell to us and prefer a player that wants to leave to go abroad (basically how we operate)
B) They have to be good enough for us while not attracting the interest of Chelsea, City, United, Arsenal who will simply win the player in question because they can pay nearly double in wages than we can. This is the key one and it's hard to find players in this bracket.