What's new

Harry Kane

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
I don’t think carrying a knock makes you loose your edge. He is missing shots he used to score with. It’s a mental thing, he is a second not a yard of the pace. I think he is a little burnt out, mentally fatigued not physically. He has a lot on his shoulders, it’s not like Llorente can rotate with him. And to be honest a bit of a catch 22. Poch has never trusted Llorente so he hasn’t got the pitch time, and thus when he plays he ain’t that good, but let’s face it he never really was. So this a lot resting on Harry and it’s not just this season it’s been going on 3 years now! The only thing I can think of is Lamela or Lucas have to be given more time further forward. Maybe we try and get ahead in some games and pull off Kane for 20 mins and shuffle those two around. Problem is we just always seem to need him and we can’t even do that. He knows it and he is feeling it. And one day he is going to realize, if I were at City, Barca, or Madrid I would get a mental break - and you know what, I would also get double the salary! We have played and pressured this young star into the ground. Sorry but not good player management for me, Poch should have seen this coming and impressed upon the board that if we don’t invest in help for Kane, eventually this would happen, he will then not be as happy as he was at Spurs, and then, he’ll be gone, and the board will be left with a bunch of money and nobody who can replace, let’s face it, one of the best players in the world! The bigger clubs would not let this happen. I’m not falling in with the press and saying we are a one man team, we have some great supporting roles, but when it comes to any decent center forwards, we have had ONE and for 3 years!! Big shame.

Wow, that's come conclusion you have there lol
 

rocklink

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2013
1,613
2,558
City got aguero and jesus, chelsea have giroud and morata, utd got lukaku and rashford, arsenal got aubamyeng and lacazette, pool got firmino, ings, solanke .. we only got kane ..
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,957
I’ve said it before but let’s not forget he’s just had a baby. That’s tiring enough as it is.
 

jurgen

Busy ****
Jul 5, 2008
6,743
17,310
City got aguero and jesus, chelsea have giroud and morata, utd got lukaku and rashford, arsenal got aubamyeng and lacazette, pool got firmino, ings, solanke .. we only got kane ..

Well if you’re not including Llorente as an option but are including Ings and Solanke, both those players have made (roughly) the same appearances as Llorente combined this season without scoring a goal (to Llorente’s overall 5) so Liverpool don’t exactly have any better alternative than us...
 

rocklink

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2013
1,613
2,558
Well if you’re not including Llorente as an option but are including Ings and Solanke, both those players have made (roughly) the same appearances as Llorente combined this season without scoring a goal (to Llorente’s overall 5) so Liverpool don’t exactly have any better alternative than us...

Problem is liverpool dont exactly play with natural striker. So i should not have made the comparison with pool
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,631
15,107
Praying it’s precautionary at best with one eye on Swansea in the cup next week

Could be a few months though!

Smart money is probably something in between
 

spursfan1991

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
1,747
4,058
Kane will be out for 2 to 4 weeks. Its very damaging for our champions league quarter final prospect. It will be such a shame after the way we gloriously knocked out Juve:(
 

kmk

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2014
4,196
28,051
6 weeks the commentators said earlier

And 4 weeks after he injured the same ankle against Millwall. Hopefully the fact that he was able to walk off and put weight on the ankle means it’s not any worse.
 
Top