- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
But that is my point, the reason most of the youth players don't let us down when they play is because there must be a point where Poch deems they have the mental fortitude to translate the ability they have shown in training and in youth games and tournaments, to our first team. .
But for that argument to be watertight, every kid would have had to be introduced as part of some grand scientific chronological plan, and I'm sure even you don't believe that. Serendipity and luck plays it's part. As does the managers aversion to risk. An aversion I can understand some of, but not all of.
Winks had already played in League and CL games early last season and proved he was OK, why did he not get another league start for about 4 months ? Grand plan ?
Look at KWP, there is no way Poch would have played him at Newcastle if he had another option. Was that the grand plan ? Brilliant judgement ? No, just damn good luck for KWP. He plays really well, and then what ? We go and spend 24m on another international RB. Another season of very few minutes for KWP looks quite likely. Despite him proving he is ready for more than that.
Pritchard is another great example, he'd proven over two seasons that he was worth some time, he'd been one of the best players over the course of a whole season for a team at the top end of the championship. What happens when he gets fit? He gets sent to Wbrom on loan. Despite us having no real alternative to Eriksen.
You can't use the "they succeed because of Poch holding them back" argument unilaterally, because there is plenty of evidence there to contradict it. It may be true in some cases, but not all, and that's all I am saying.