- Apr 22, 2014
- 1,953
- 5,040
Send them a right back on loan and bring in another LB? That would give us 3 lb's and only one RB.
Well, for one, KWP can cover LB and RB and, for two, was predicated on the assumption we're signing a right back. Fair point, if we don't sign a right back, we'd be mental to let KWP go, I assumed that'd be obvious but should have made it clearer.
Disagree also on the 3 left backs point - whilst it would be true in the narrow sense, I'd argue that it would free up Davies to play LCB and left back and Rose/Sessegnon at LWB with sessegnon also being an option further forward. So it would be more accurate to say we'd have 3 left backs, an extra centre back, two left wing backs and an extra attacking midfielder.
Edit - further point to this, if we sell Wimmer then having another left footed centre half would be a huge bonus (even with signing Sanchez) so would be a benefit to us having the option of playing davies there