- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
Parker is a much better player than Jenas, lets have it right here when has Jenas ever come close to winning the Journo's player of the year.
For crying out load BC persepctive please.
I do think Paker and Palacios would also be a good pairing but Sandro isn't the one in the middle of transfer negotiations. That said though I feel Sandro is a better footballer than Palacios and he's younger with more potential. I think he reads the game very well and is understanding positionally for someone as young as he is....is exceptional. He'll be a better player than Palacios, he arguably already is. I understand your arguments for keeping him but he will procure a hefty fee...not to be overlooked if you're Dan Levy.
I like Wilson dont get me wrong and would have Jenas out before him but he will command a decent fee and Levy will see this as an opportunity to recoup most of that 12 million - if not all of it.
Parker is a lot more tenacious than Jenas, and he has a good bit more footballing ability than Palacios...I think all round he'll be a great signing for a couple of seasons anyway.
We need top 4 next season or we are going to lose our best players, its as simple as that. We need players coming in who are going to hit the ground running and Parker fits the bill...his leadership qualities will be big too, we need characters on the pitch, something we always seemed to have lacked.
Harry might have is eye on England and is thinking short term but in reality its what we need, we have to hit top 4 next season and need players in who will have an immedidate impact.
I have always like Scott Parker and have wanted us to sign him every time he's moved previously. I like his mentality and combination of tenacity and ability to chip in with a couple of goals/assists a season.
But Parker isn't a much better player than Jenas. He's more tenacious and a better tackler. But Jenas is a better footballer going forward and has been his whole career.
For example contrast the last season that both played similar time on the pitch 2008-9. Jenas played 2500 minutes, Parker 2400 minutes. Parker contested 120 tackles, Jenas 85. But Jenas scored/assisted combined 7, Parker 4. Att Created Jenas 42, Parker 23. The previous year Jenas's goals/assists was 10.
And with people like Sandro and Palacios in the squad what we really need is someone who can put a foot in, get up and down the pitch but who will also chip in with 8-15 goal/assists a season. That is why I would keep both Palacios and Sandro ahead of Huddelstone, because he is never going to be a dynamic box to box midfielder and Palacios and Sandro are both much better defensively than him, allowing a better box to box player to play next to them if needs be.
This has always been my problem with Hudd. He is a decent passer of a football, but that is his only real asset. He doesn't get up and down the pitch. He doesn't contribute much offensively, he is a liability when the opposition have the ball. In short we have two players who are jack of all and master of none (him and Jenas) and he is the master of least.
I understand the logic of Parker 5 years ago, even three years ago, but his old, injury ravaged legs aren't going to get him up and down the pitch as well as we would like. He'll be a decent addition to the squad - but I'd sooner wait for a better upgrade on Jenas and/or Hudd and keep Palacios.
If Palacios stays as well as Parker and one/both of Jenas/Hudd goes I would less troubled.