What's new

Sol Campbell wants to be one of the greatest British managers ever

'O Zio

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2014
7,405
13,785
I wonder if this is how he interviews?
So Sol, what formation would you play if we hired you? 10 outfield and 1 keeper with some substitutes

Who would you have in goal? The goal keeper.

Would you sacrifice a Cup game for the league? Trumpets.

Based on the well-publicised stuff you hear about him, I think it's more like:

So what formation would you play?
Formation? Pffft...I'm Sol Campbell
Who would you have in goal?
I'm not a goalkeeper, but I am Sol Campbell
Would you sacrifice a cup game for the league?
Would I sacrifice a....come off it, I'm Sol Campbell
Is there anything else you'd like to discuss?
Discuss? I'm Sol Campbell, what else is there to discuss?
OK thanks Mr Campbell, we'll be in touch.
So I got the job then yeah? After all, I am Sol Campbell.
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
If a genie popped out of a lamp and said he could go back in time and make it so Sol Campbell never left spurs, would you:

a) Accept that reality knowing that Arsenal might not have their "stint" of glory, and we might have had our own, but know that in the future everyone associated with the club would have the embarrassment that is Sol Campbell, or;
b) Politely thank him but decline.
 

spurs mental

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2007
25,316
49,968
If a genie popped out of a lamp and said he could go back in time and make it so Sol Campbell never left spurs, would you:

a) Accept that reality knowing that Arsenal might not have their "stint" of glory, and we might have had our own, but know that in the future everyone associated with the club would have the embarrassment that is Sol Campbell, or;
b) Politely thank him but decline.
Decline. I want my jelly and ice cream
 

Col_M

Pointing out the Obvious
Feb 28, 2012
22,786
45,887
If a genie popped out of a lamp and said he could go back in time and make it so Sol Campbell never left spurs, would you:

a) Accept that reality knowing that Arsenal might not have their "stint" of glory, and we might have had our own, but know that in the future everyone associated with the club would have the embarrassment that is Sol Campbell, or;
b) Politely thank him but decline.

We’ve had plenty of embarassing players who were/are also heroes.
 

'O Zio

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2014
7,405
13,785
If a genie popped out of a lamp and said he could go back in time and make it so Sol Campbell never left spurs, would you:

a) Accept that reality knowing that Arsenal might not have their "stint" of glory, and we might have had our own, but know that in the future everyone associated with the club would have the embarrassment that is Sol Campbell, or;
b) Politely thank him but decline.

Definitely option B.

IMO Arsenal's "stint of glory" as you put it would've still happened even without Campbell. He was a good player but he wasn't the key difference maker in that team. And likewise, by keeping Campbell I don't necessarily think we'd have gone on to any kind of glory either. We'd have been better off with him, but it's not like we just missed out on the title because we didn't have Campbell at the back etc.
 

jondesouza

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2004
2,842
1,558
How many are exclusively associated with us? e.g. Gazza had several clubs, Hoddle was also very much Chelsea etc.

No way was Hoddle 'very much Chelsea'. The best years of his playing career were with us. He may have been player-manager at Chelsea for a few years but that doesn't create the same attachment as he had with us.
 

'O Zio

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2014
7,405
13,785
How many are exclusively associated with us? e.g. Gazza had several clubs, Hoddle was also very much Chelsea etc.

Since when was Hoddle "very much Chelsea"? :confused:

Out of the thousands of players weve had in our history, he's one of the ones who is most heavily associated with us out. Wasn't he voted our greatest ever player or something a couple of years ago? He spent over a decade playing for us and is one of the few players where the word "club legend" is genuinely not an exaggeration.

He played a handful of games a Chelsea player/manager right at the end of his career and then became full-time manager for a couple of years after that, but in no way is he really associated with the club. That's like saying Steven Gerrard is "very much LA Galaxy" or something.
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
I wonder if we'll ever nick one of Arsenal's players in the future?

Mid-table clubs can produce one or two gems every few years, so you never know. :whistle:
 

aliyid

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2004
7,003
20,129
DF1B696B-B46C-46C5-8F74-321F05D147E3.jpeg
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
No way was Hoddle 'very much Chelsea'. The best years of his playing career were with us. He may have been player-manager at Chelsea for a few years but that doesn't create the same attachment as he had with us.
Since when was Hoddle "very much Chelsea"? :confused:
...
He played a handful of games a Chelsea player/manager right at the end of his career and then became full-time manager for a couple of years after that, but in no way is he really associated with the club.

From knowing the Chelsea fan's side of things, he is (in my experience, to pre-RA-buyout fans) on the same par as Redknapp was with us. You don't have to be at a club for a long time to gain an association. VdV is seen as being "Spurs", as is Friedel (who played more with Villa and Blackburn), Les Ferdinand. Loads of examples.

Look at how associated with the club Klinsmann is, when he only really ever played a season and a half for us across 2 stints.

Point is, you can watch TV and Glenn will be in the studio, and the ticker under him will say something in reference to maybe "Former Chelsea Manager" or " Managed Chelsea to FA Cup final in 1994".... or even references to his odd stint with England - so the sole association to Spurs won't exist for a casual football fan in the minds of the many.

That's like saying Steven Gerrard is "very much LA Galaxy" or something.

The Gerrard comparison is ridiculous, as he played his whole career with Liverpool, then had one season at Galaxy. Hoddle played for another 8 years with 3 clubs and 200 games after Spurs.
 

yanno

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2003
5,857
2,877
From knowing the Chelsea fan's side of things, he is (in my experience, to pre-RA-buyout fans) on the same par as Redknapp was with us. You don't have to be at a club for a long time to gain an association. VdV is seen as being "Spurs", as is Friedel (who played more with Villa and Blackburn), Les Ferdinand. Loads of examples.

Look at how associated with the club Klinsmann is, when he only really ever played a season and a half for us across 2 stints.

Point is, you can watch TV and Glenn will be in the studio, and the ticker under him will say something in reference to maybe "Former Chelsea Manager" or " Managed Chelsea to FA Cup final in 1994".... or even references to his odd stint with England - so the sole association to Spurs won't exist for a casual football fan in the minds of the many.



The Gerrard comparison is ridiculous, as he played his whole career with Liverpool, then had one season at Galaxy. Hoddle played for another 8 years with 3 clubs and 200 games after Spurs.

I stood on the Shelf - yes you once could - and had the privilege of watching Glenn Hoddle, the greatest creative midfielder in our club's history, in hundreds of games.

Hoddle came through our Academy and didn't stop playing for us until he was almost 30 years old, jetting off to Monaco.

He also managed Spurs.

For all his sins and with all his genius as a player, Glenn Hoddle is Spurs. Not chavski.
 

pffft

some kind of member
Jul 19, 2013
1,527
5,540
Really chaps? We're debating, including showing all the workings out, whether a genuine Spurs (fan, player, manager) legend is actually Spurs?

Really?

Sometimes this place is proper weird.
 

LSUY

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2005
24,027
66,878
If a genie popped out of a lamp and said he could go back in time and make it so Sol Campbell never left spurs, would you:

a) Accept that reality knowing that Arsenal might not have their "stint" of glory, and we might have had our own, but know that in the future everyone associated with the club would have the embarrassment that is Sol Campbell, or;
b) Politely thank him but decline.

A, definitely A. Yes we would have to put up with the future embarrassment that is Sol Campbell but we'd all have memories of a centre-back pairing of Ledley King and Campbell. If we had kept Campbell then Chris Perry would not have played over 100 matches for us.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
Really chaps? We're debating, including showing all the workings out, whether a genuine Spurs (fan, player, manager) legend is actually Spurs?

Really?

Sometimes this place is proper weird.

Sometimes I wonder if you're really SC :cautious:
 
Top