- Jun 1, 2011
- 7,182
- 16,793
That’s just it, we only go over 50 pages if we lose or draw.Can't moan very much about a steady strangulation of the opposition I guess?
Probably bitching that we didn’t get 6
That’s just it, we only go over 50 pages if we lose or draw.Can't moan very much about a steady strangulation of the opposition I guess?
The pundits are queuing up and falling over themselves to say that Kane is the best centre forward in the world. No shit Sherlocks...
And by quite some margin IMHO.He is
He is
Cech was the difference. Were he not having the game of his life, we’d have been 3 or 4 goals out of sight... And deservedly so. They should be grateful it wasn’t a massacre.Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger: "In the first half we missed three or four opportunities on the counter attack which is difficult to swallow, always the final ball. We contained them to very little.
"Once they scored you could see we were wobbling and they could have scored more but in the last 10 minutes we should have come back to 1-1.
"The first goal was key and we conceded it. Kane made the difference, that's what he's about. I have seen the replay, it is no foul, just good centre-forward play. We can only look at ourselves.
"It will be more difficult to finish in the top four but we have to fight for it. "
We were another level to them in the second half.People moaning about about missed chances lol
On another day Harry's volley and Trips volleys would go straight in the corner, they were lucky it was one nil.
We battered them, despite the score line.
Its feels sooooo good when we are involved in the first game of the week and it results in a win for us. Puts the pressure on all the other teams around us.
They would have piled players forward regardless of who we brought on, they had no choice. I get what you are saying but you have to consider that Lamela's introduction didn't really allow them to build from the back and find their patterns and we were still threatening them at this point anyway. So you could say that was an attacking change in itself. Would Moura have been sharp enough coming into a game with so much intensity and concentration considering he's not played much football at all. I think Poch called it right, and had we scored that second we wouldn't even be talking about Lacazette's miss as they'd be irrelevant.Agree with this. Its good to see that Poch can make more defensive changes and try to see a game out (can't remember him have done this before) - but this was not that kind of game IMO. It worked well this time but Lacazzette could have destroyed our good performance at the end. If he had put on Moura (or another attacking player - dear i say sissoko) we could have countered and more importantly: they would have needed to show us more respect and not push all their players forward. Poch probably thought it was necessary nevertheless with more "fighting power" and therefore bringing on Wanyama. We were played deep at the end and it could have ended in disaster - but this time it didn't. Happy with the victory but if poch has a weakness that sure has to be he's in game management - or tactics in general? I love he's football philosophy (we don't bow down to anyone) but we do the same thing every game in terms of style of play. We do change formations though, and this is of course part of the tactical aspect as well, and i think Poch does better in this area. We set up to dominate in every game and as honorable this is it can be a little naive sometimes - the irony is that we did the opposite at the end in this match. Poch tried to make a tactical change (and not a very brave one) and sit back - that was wrong (IMO) in this match even though it worked out.
Over 50 pages?
What’s going on? We won...