The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 12th August 2014

[Stoof]

Today, this thread has been horrible.

 

[Kaboul'sForehead]

Lmfao. Some of you need a wank break. Boy are we desperate for positive itk, it's like world war Z in here.

Don't mind if I do! Will be back in...oh no wait I'm done

Expectation levels rapidly increase as the season beginning draws close, it's natural and I'm guilty of worrying and obsessing too.

But we have to try and keep the faith in what tasty signings Poch, Levy and Baldini will bring to the table in the remaining window. And even if we don't sign anyone, remember even leftover food when prepared right can be tasty. Much like our current crop of players under a proper coach, i.e Poch.

With proper preparation, they will be great

 

[SargeantMeatCurtains]

So, according to Sky, the mystery midfielder is Stoke's N'Zonzi.

 

[rawhide]

Don't mind if I do! Will be back in...oh no wait I'm done

You'd better not be typing with that hand...

 

[Vwbottom]

Lmfao. Some of you need a wank break. Boy are we desperate for positive itk, it's like world war Z in here.

World war tree...

 

[Gaz_Gammon]

Pin the tail on the donkey thread....
My fucking favourite of all time.

Has to be Dawson then.................

 

[doom]

scraps of itk about a scrappy midfielder wanted from scrppy Palace from any club.. what a great ITK day!

 

[chinaman]

Don't mind if I do! Will be back in...oh no wait I'm done

Expectation levels rapidly increase as the season beginning draws close, it's natural and I'm guilty of worrying and obsessing too.

But we have to try and keep the faith in what tasty signings Poch, Levy and Baldini will bring to the table in the remaining window. And even if we don't sign anyone, remember even leftover food when prepared right can be tasty. Much like our current crop of players under a proper coach, i.e Poch.

With proper preparation, they will be great

I have a feeling you like chop suey.

 

[LexingtonSpurs]

Today, this thread has been horrible.

Today?

 

[septicsac]

Can't we just stick to discussing ITK without bad tree references?



Arghhh now i'm doing it

OAKee dOAKee............












Sorry