- Jul 22, 2008
- 43,881
- 95,149
Was Ghostfarmo formally The Scout, was one of the very few that said Bale was gone.
Yeah, The Scout.
Was Ghostfarmo formally The Scout, was one of the very few that said Bale was gone.
Walker for Perreira and Barkley I can live with.
Perreira looks to have great pace and attacking skills, my only worry is he looks a little lightweight.
Barkley will give us depth to go from CL or PL matches, and could be a revelation if Poch can get into his head.
But that is clearly not why we are selling. As has been often reported and ITK'd there was a falling out. That is why Walker is going. As Poch said we will not sell anyone we don't want to sell.The only way we should be willing to "live with" Walker leaving is if Poch has decided that Trippier or incoming RB is better than Walker. If we are selling to raise funds to be able to buy Barkley then I can't live with that.
No matter what we still need a forward ideally with pace. Can't risk another bad Kane injury, relying on jansson clicking.
Not buying another forward would be madness especially playing our home games at Wembley. Will need something different in games
The only way we should be willing to "live with" Walker leaving is if Poch has decided that Trippier or incoming RB is better than Walker. If we are selling to raise funds to be able to buy Barkley then I can't live with that.
pretty sure Everton know Walker is off. If half of spurs community know I'm pretty sure top agents are hearing, I think we are more likely waiting nearer deadline day to scare Everton that they might get nowt for him. Cue Arsenal to beat us to him.Reads to me that we are holding back the sale of Walker to keep the Barkley price down
Why? That's what we've been doing the last 3-4 years, selling players and making the squad better. If Poch thinks he can live without Walker and we can bring in two players with his money, it's good business.The only way we should be willing to "live with" Walker leaving is if Poch has decided that Trippier or incoming RB is better than Walker. If we are selling to raise funds to be able to buy Barkley then I can't live with that.
would city sell to us.... no, why sell to them, we don't need the money, well just be strengthening city, and they will want to weaken us from this... be sure of it1.An absolutely obscene amount of money £60m/£70m.
2.Barkley.
3.A quality right/wing back replacement.
Selling any player to a rival hurts badly.
I'm now finally resigned to losing Walker.
However, those 3 options at the top happening because of the Walker deal would ease the pain.
And as long as Pochettino is 100% behind this decision then so be it...
would city sell to us.... no, why sell to them, we don't need the money, well just be strengthening city, and they will want to weaken us from this... be sure of it
Walker has only come of age under Poch. Before that he was a good full back with terrible concentration levels.would city sell to us.... no, why sell to them, we don't need the money, well just be strengthening city, and they will want to weaken us from this... be sure of it
No chance Foyth and Pau qualify as the 2 because they wouldn't be bought with the impending Walker money. To me the 2 have to equate to the sort of money Walker is sold for. Most likely Barkley and one other.Got to assume Rebrab's info was based on Walker being off too, a catalyst if you will.
Scout's info always worth a lot of attention.
I'm expecting it to be Barkley and Pereira, although the latter has gone very quiet. I'm hoping for something cool from left field in a Son style though. Weirdly I'm more concerned about attacking options than a Walker replacement, probably because we have Trippier already and KWP in the wings...
I really hope Pau and Foyth don't qualify for the two in, the latter because it seems he will not be joining immediately.
would city sell to us.... no, why sell to them, we don't need the money, well just be strengthening city, and they will want to weaken us from this... be sure of it