- Jan 18, 2005
- 7,173
- 19,679
Was going to ask the same thing.
I’m sure he means Manc clubs
Was going to ask the same thing.
Auto-correct doing its thing, suspect it should read “Manc clubs”Was going to ask the same thing.
No one else complys with it. So don't worry!Great news. But can we spend £150m and comply with the FFP regulations?
Great news. But can we spend £150m and comply with the FFP regulations?
No one else complys with is. So don't worry!
I took it as mancs clubs and a predictive error but maybe wrong"mamas clubs"?
The 2 clubs that rely on mama's credit card to get anywhere"mamas clubs"?
Typo-correction mancs"mamas clubs"?
Typo-correction mancs
Now Poch has said it, I will unfold s bit more. We WILL exceed 150m spend, which relies not on sales, and a good amount of sales monies will be added. We want 3 priority signings in early, possibly four. Aside from mancs clubs, we are in the same market as the other top 4 clubs.
Now Poch has said it, I will unfold s bit more. We WILL exceed 150m spend, which relies not on sales, and a good amount of sales monies will be added. We want 3 priority signings in early, possibly four. Aside from mancs clubs, we are in the same market as the other top 4 clubs.
Hope majority of it's going towards an attacking pkayer and Cm(preferably jorginho and Malcom).Now Poch has said it, I will unfold s bit more. We WILL exceed 150m spend, which relies not on sales, and a good amount of sales monies will be added. We want 3 priority signings in early, possibly four. Aside from mancs clubs, we are in the same market as the other top 4 clubs.
Lol, thought I had fat fingers ?Hope majority of it's going towards an attacking pkayer and Cm(preferably jorginho and Malcom).