- Dec 29, 2005
- 2,731
- 5,870
Keep Mason
Sell the 2 lightweights and the pizza delivery fellow
Room for 2 more signings
Sell the 2 lightweights and the pizza delivery fellow
Room for 2 more signings
Keep Mason
Sell the 2 lightweights and the pizza delivery fellow
Room for 2 more signings
Cryptic?!WILCO
Cryptic?!
Wilco - Wilco Johnson - Dr Feelgood - Southend - so we're signing someone from Southend?!
Joke.
Good news so far on KG Nkoudou. Would it be safe to say this is the last in, in this transfer window? Compared to previous transfer windows this is a pleasent change of pace, hopefully more to come like this.
Efficient.
Keep Mason
Sell the 2 lightweights and the pizza delivery fellow
Room for 2 more signings
I don't know why you come on this forum. All you ever do is post shitty comments about our players.
Eh?
This is not the case. Injury record is clearly a huge factor. I like Sturridge for example but...
Then there's someone like Wanyama who's proven he can play to top six standard at epl tempo. Versus an eighteen year old Serbian who hasn't.
Levy seems to have a similar attitude to risk as you. He won't put 30m down on one player, who would significantly improve the first eleven, when he could buy two prospects for the same money. I say save the money we want to spend on this Marseille bloke, and put it towards buying a 30m player next summer.
You're not getting where I'm coming from. The best way I can explain it is, we paid (or could've paid) £26mil for Soldado, whilst Harry Kane cost us the square route of fuck all (apart from the obvious wages etc).
Based on your stance, Soldado should've been the success, whilst Kane should've been a failure. Also based upon your stance, Darren Bent should've been more successful than Berbatov, as he cost us upwards of £6mil more than Berbatov did. Same with £16mil David Bentley, who was totally upstaged by £1mil Aaron Lennon.
United spent some £30mil on Veron, yet £18mil Carrick has been the success there.
Is that more clear? Spending big money does NOT equate to a likelihood of the player being more successful than a cheaper alternative.
Could you just go over that again please....you lost me there
Really? Not the thread for me to go over it again. It simply says that spending big doesn't necessarily mean the player is more likely to be a success than a different player who cost considerably less.
No....just a humor failure
Get a room you two for fucks sake.I thought it was a joke, but didn't want to press 'funny' in case I was wrong & you took offence.
Fyi I know Mason's aunty.
Cryptic?!
Wilco - Wilco Johnson - Dr Feelgood - Southend - so we're signing someone from Southend?!
Joke.
Good news so far on KG Nkoudou. Would it be safe to say this is the last in, in this transfer window? Compared to previous transfer windows this is a pleasent change of pace, hopefully more to come like this.
Efficient.
Fyi I know Mason's aunty.
Is she the reason for the shit tattoo on his arm?Fyi I know Mason's aunty.
I don't know what's worse, mentioning Harry Hotspur, or actually putting it in the ITK thread.
You're not getting where I'm coming from. The best way I can explain it is, we paid (or could've paid) £26mil for Soldado, whilst Harry Kane cost us the square route of fuck all (apart from the obvious wages etc).
Based on your stance, Soldado should've been the success, whilst Kane should've been a failure. Also based upon your stance, Darren Bent should've been more successful than Berbatov, as he cost us upwards of £6mil more than Berbatov did. Same with £16mil David Bentley, who was totally upstaged by £1mil Aaron Lennon.
United spent some £30mil on Veron, yet £18mil Carrick has been the success there.
Is that more clear? Spending big money does NOT equate to a likelihood of the player being more successful than a cheaper alternative.