The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 23rd August 2016

Discussion in 'The January 2016 Transfer Rumours Archive' started by Archibald&Crooks, Aug 23, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. whatislifewithoutspurs

    whatislifewithoutspurs Active Member

    Messages:
    144
    Ratings Received:
    +650 / 97 / -29
    Because of our performance in the last 3 games.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Amnesiac503

    Amnesiac503 Member

    Messages:
    61
    Ratings Received:
    +302 / 1 / -2
    And the bench.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  3. taidgh

    taidgh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,337
    Ratings Received:
    +3,083 / 54 / -25
    Because it's SC, a place more schizophrenic than any other forum I know.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. KeithStone

    KeithStone Member

    Messages:
    68
    Ratings Received:
    +166 / 8 / -2
    But some would argue (and I would say correctly), that the reason those players didn't feature more last season is because the first 11 or so were run completely into the ground. And now, with a new season, improved rivals and bigger competitions to be part of, we're putting ourselves in a very risky position to do the same thing again.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. piedpiper

    piedpiper Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,444
    Ratings Received:
    +1,096 / 196 / -110
    Trying to give this an agree rating deserves a winner too. We truly did run our 1st 11 hard last season. I would keep players like Mason/Chadli. Why weaken the squad when we have a more demanding season ahead.

    We always linked to some or other top signing in the final days of the window. Selling our experienced squad players. Bentaleb Mason, Chadli and not getting replacements is suicidal. We cant get Nkoudou or Pau Lopez over the line after almost 2 months of being linked to the former how can we possibly do deals inside of 3 days.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page