What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 26 August 2011

whitelightwhiteheat

SC Supporter
Jul 21, 2006
6,517
3,195
Isn't Parker 30? Players comfortably play until 33-34 these days no problem.

Not that I'm advocating Parker. I'm not convinced he's what we need. He's alright I suppose. I'd rather Diarra too, personally.

What happened with Diarra? Is it off completely now?
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
22,959
29,896
I'm stating to come round to the idea of Parker for 5m.

1. Homegrown
2. Leader
3. Reliable
4. Prem experience
5. Good player

Because he won't play every week he will not burn out like he did with spammers. Plus he is better then Jenas (anyone who thinks otherwise is talking out of their arse)

Still want Diarra though. Huddlestone has looked very rusty in pre season and will take him until Christmas to get fully fit. Don't think we can rely on him ATM. Maybe even a loan until Jan might not be a bad idea

Sandro, Modric, Diarra, Parker (Huddlestone Livermore)

Sandro, Modric'
 

chkthfc82

Active Member
Jul 25, 2008
2,330
0
Parker would improve us. Not sure what the issue is here.

I agree mate but a lot if people in here live in a fantasy world and think we are signing players like Rossi and co which just isn't going to happen because we don't pay the wages.
 
Top