The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 6th August 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.

codspur

SC Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,259
#3
Not sure that's a good idea Nailsy as Gards said ilthebinfo wasn't for Twitter and the RO pings straight to Twitter doesn't it
 

Donki

Has a Massive Member Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
9,510
#4
Attacking option could come from the PL? Why do I think Lanzini could be that player? I think he would be a great addition to the squad.
 

trasores

Active Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2006
Messages
780
#5
there is no way Wet Spam would sell Lanzini to us - unless he has a ridiculously low buy out clause
Attacking option could come from the PL? Why do I think Lanzini could be that player? I think he would be a great addition to the squad.
 

Donki

Has a Massive Member Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
9,510
#8
there is no way Wet Spam would sell Lanzini to us - unless he has a ridiculously low buy out clause
No idea about a release clause but I'd say Lanzini would love the move, he could stay in London, link up with Poch... and well get out of West Ham. Nothing like a little bit of head turning! ;)
 

Pedro

Blue & Yellow
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
1,993
#11
Re Gards ITK: I think via several liked and disliked posts it was evident that Barkley is not the back up attacking option. I would imagine it's Zaha given our previous links. I can't see us going for a full on striker, and although king can play multiple positions he does seem more a striker than anything else.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
45,293
Thread starter #12
OK fuck this thread. Locked.

Actually, no, perp banned. There are loaods of people who enjoy this thread i'm going to try to not let a handful of fucktards ruin it for everyone.......Who's next? Anyone else want to treat the world to their inspired hunch as to which, out of thousands of players, we might sign?

Or shall we stick to ITK? If you want to tell the world who you think we might sign, go write it on the wall of your nearest shithouse, it'll give you something to do while you've got your old chap dangling through the glory hole waiting to shout bingo........
 
Last edited:

Woodyy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
1,210
#13
Genuine question as I read through the sticky and I'm still not 100% sure, I take it the main thing that gets these threads locked/people banned other than the rules in the sticky is speculation about stuff that has little/no basis?
 

Tucker

Devious Lefty
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,840
#14
Genuine question as I read through the sticky and I'm still not 100% sure, I take it the main thing that gets these threads locked/people banned other than the rules in the sticky is speculation about stuff that has little/no basis?
This thread is for the discussion of information given by itk people that the mods have verified. Most of the time it gets locked because people spam it up with pointless guessing games, or they start talking about off topic stuff, i.e. Things not related to the afformentioned ITK.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
18,533
#15
Not sure that's a good idea Nailsy as Gards said ilthebinfo wasn't for Twitter and the RO pings straight to Twitter doesn't it
I've just double checked and I can't find anything from Gards about not posting to the RO. I think Breezer said his stuff wasn't for the RO though.
 

codspur

SC Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,259
#16
Not sure that's a good idea Nailsy as Gards said ilthebinfo wasn't for Twitter and the RO pings straight to Twitter doesn't it
I've just double checked and I can't find anything from Gards about not posting to the RO. I think Breezer said his stuff wasn't for the RO though.
He said on twitter his stuff wasn't for on there mate and as the RO auto tweets I think posss best to remove unless he says otherwise just my onion
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
45,293
Thread starter #18

nailsy

SC Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
18,533
#19
He said on twitter his stuff wasn't for on there mate and as the RO auto tweets I think posss best to remove unless he says otherwise just my onion
Oh, OK. I don't use Twitter so didn't know that. I don't have access to modify the RO Post so @Archibald&Crooks will need to decide whether to delete it or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top