What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 6th August 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
This thread is for the discussion of information given by itk people that the mods have verified. Most of the time it gets locked because people spam it up with pointless guessing games, or they start talking about off topic stuff, i.e. Things not related to the afformentioned ITK.
What I don't understand is how 20-30 posters feel the need to guess the same thing. "I really think the latest ITK can be referring to us signing a homo-erotic dwarf to cover for Kane". Subsequently, you get 15 pages with people logging in only to write the same assumption, and whether or not the homo-erotic dwarf can be used as cover for both of the sadomasochistic wingers. :stop:
 

Bobbins

SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008
May 5, 2005
21,598
45,145
Morning A&C. I've just added Gards info to the RO. @Bobbins and @shelfmonkey posted some info the other day as well, but they probably need to run it past you before it goes in there.

Thanks but I don't think my ITK was substantial/revelatory enough to justify going in the RO - it was only really some confirmation of stuff we already knew/had figured out ourselves. I also have no established history of ITK so whilst I obviously know the source is good, I don't think first-time ITK-ers really justify RO posts.

Maybe in a few more windows if I can manage to get some reliable info a few more times!

(y)
 

VegasII

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2008
9,750
16,670
They'll be a lot of people standing around with sore arses this winter having been bummed to buggery by A&C and his Das Boot inspired Chemsex...all for the crime of posting repetitive cobblers in the ITK thread. Don't do it to yourselves!

The rest of us also don't want to chuff through umpteen pages of guff and swill!
 

codspur

SC Supporter
Jul 14, 2008
2,720
8,489
This thread is for the discussion of information given by itk people that the mods have verified. Most of the time it gets locked because people spam it up with pointless guessing games, or they start talking about off topic stuff, i.e. Things not related to the afformentioned ITK.
What I don't understand is how 20-30 posters feel the need to guess the same thing. "I really think the latest ITK can be referring to us signing a homo-erotic dwarf to cover for Kane". Subsequently, you get 15 pages with people logging in only to write the same assumption, and whether or not the homo-erotic dwarf can be used as cover for both of the sadomasochistic wingers. :stop:
Genuinely think it's born of a desire to say 'I told you so' in much the same way as those who constantly say we will sign no one. Then he / she can quote themselves when their prediction number 472 comes true and we can behold them as a visionary seer.
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
26,971
61,861
I have got a bit lost in all the non RO ITK from Friday so are we expecting a signing tomorrow or not? Can't remember who said we were.
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,511
330,414
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.
 

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.
In my view could actually be the most vital piece of info we've had in weeks. It's way more interesting than merely as an afterthought, at any rate. Cheers, Trix.
 

U.S. Spurs Fan

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
655
2,493
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.

By the sounds of it then, Levy and Co. are simply waiting (hoping?) until prices come down to where they want them. This is a dangerous game however as if the prices don't come down, they either don't get who they want and have a very thin squad or they end up paying a higher amount (Sissoko for example) and wasting time that the players could have gotten into the squad.

If i remember correctly, this would go along with something Ali Z said a day or so ago about prices just being too high.

Not sure why they just don't focus on release clause players where the price is very clear.
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,655
25,970
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.
That’ll postpone the wrist slitting for a couple of days, thanks for the update
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,957
71,376
By the sounds of it then, Levy and Co. are simply waiting (hoping?) until prices come down to where they want them. This is a dangerous game however as if the prices don't come down, they either don't get who they want and have a very thin squad or they end up paying a higher amount (Sissoko for example) and wasting time that the players could have gotten into the squad.

If i remember correctly, this would go along with something Ali Z said a day or so ago about prices just being too high.

Not sure why they just don't focus on release clause players where the price is very clear.
Levy would likely still try to negotiate down from the release clause.
 

Streetspur77

Happy Clapper
Jul 20, 2017
2,792
9,404
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.

Slightly more positive but surely there should be more urgency in terms of the rb if poch doesn't think KWP is ready for newcastle

All round we are playing a very dangerous game and if things aren't going very well vs newcastle we have literally no options from the bench
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,009
32,745
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.
This is very interesting as it seems Lemar was/is obviously a target.
 
Last edited:

Hot Spur

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2014
784
2,290
Just spoke to my mate and I'm afraid there is very little to tell. Nothing has changed! We are still looking to get 3 in. Barkley still wants to come, and the only way anyone is leaving is with the managers consent. Something he did say though was that he was told we are still going after the same players we were from the start. So by that I took it as, they were top of the list players, and we haven't had to move on after not getting a preffered target.
Thanks Trix. One target we didn't get though according to previous ITK was the South American. Our bid was rejected so we were told. Unless of course we are submitting an improved bid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top