What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 9th June 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.

robin09

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
6,800
7,697
ITK says N'Dom, Clarke and Sess bros. That's got to be the best part of 100m spend.

I don't see how we'd also sign Lo Celso, or anyone else, without first needing to sell someone, like Eriksen. A shame, but it's understandable given the outlay it looks like we're about to have.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,271
57,611
'Cooling off' on LoCelso could well be a ploy to get them to reconsider their asking price. Fingers crossed.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,128
46,117
Have to say I’m not as excited about Sess as I was a year ago. Not just because he made no impact last season either. I’m just not sure where he fits in?

He seemed a good fit on the left if we continued with 3 at the back, but I really don’t like it when we set up that way.
 

-Afri-Coy-

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2012
5,853
18,610
Have to say I’m not as excited about Sess as I was a year ago. Not just because he made no impact last season either. I’m just not sure where he fits in?

He seemed a good fit on the left if we continued with 3 at the back, but I really don’t like it when we set up that way.

And I got about 6000 optimistic ratings when I said Levy and co would deliver this summer. Feels good to be proven right even though the doubters had 100% reason to think negatively.
 

buttons

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2005
2,945
3,861
Thanks all! Possibly the most positive morning of ITK ever?!

Hope Ndombele is very close albeit JJ has tempered my expectations a little.

Zaha wouldn’t surprise me but imagine that will require Eriksen and Lamela to leave?

Bale, would be unbelievable!
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,552
43,063
Have to say I’m not as excited about Sess as I was a year ago. Not just because he made no impact last season either. I’m just not sure where he fits in?

He seemed a good fit on the left if we continued with 3 at the back, but I really don’t like it when we set up that way.

I think he's a great player to add to the squad. We need to keep picking up players with potential as our squad is starting to age. I think the long term aim is to make him a top attacking LB but he can also be a squad option in wide areas early on. He has pace and good movement so would suit us, and should improve with better team mates.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,128
46,117
I think he's a great player to add to the squad. We need to keep picking up players with potential as our squad is starting to age. I think the long term aim is to make him a top attacking LB but he can also be a squad option in wide areas early on. He has pace and good movement so would suit us, and should improve with better team mates.

Yeah I’m not totally against signing him. I’m just not that fussed either way and hope it doesn’t stop us pursuing other signings in what I consider greater areas of need.
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,552
43,063
Yeah I’m not totally against signing him. I’m just not that fussed either way and hope it doesn’t stop us pursuing other signings in what I consider greater areas of need.

Yeah I totally see that too. I remember in the past there was talk of money being set aside for development/prospects. I wonder if Sessegnon and Clarke fall into that territory. In which case it might not be as simple as saying 'leave those deals and use the money on Lo Celso instead'.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
15,984
32,702
ITK says N'Dom, Clarke and Sess bros. That's got to be the best part of 100m spend.

I don't see how we'd also sign Lo Celso, or anyone else, without first needing to sell someone, like Eriksen. A shame, but it's understandable given the outlay it looks like we're about to have.
I don't think we'll be able to use any RB money either as that will be pumped into a direct replacement by the sounds of it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top