What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread 9th June

Status
Not open for further replies.

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,590
205,100
index.php

Here's a brand new thread for you to discuss today's ITK

If you're thinking of posting media stories, chatting about formations or anything else that enters the vacuum between your ears that isn't precisely ITK related, don't do it. It's not a good idea, this thread isn't for that and it's likely you'll find yourself out of here.
 

Lighty64

I believe
Aug 24, 2010
10,400
12,476
Morning and hope we get some news today, though hard to beat the great news of Kane signing that new contract
 

Gollorius

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
417
1,496
Haven’t logged in for a few days, are the recent (unrelated) cryptics still unsolved?
 

Parkie

Huge member
Jun 9, 2012
1,964
4,772
Haven’t logged in for a few days, are the recent (unrelated) cryptics still unsolved?
Well, we have sorted contracts for a keeper * (1) and striker (10) ...

*OK, not the number 1 keeper but, you know, it sort of fits!
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,590
205,100
  • Thread starter
  • Admin
  • #5
Haven’t logged in for a few days, are the recent (unrelated) cryptics still unsolved?
Still unsolved. But that could change over the next few days.

So guesses as to recent happenings that it 'could' apply to can stop. If anything happened that it was applicable to we'd have said wouldn't we.
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,552
43,063
Still unsolved. But that could change over the next few days.

So guesses as to recent happenings that it 'could' apply to can stop. If anything happened that it was applicable to we'd have said wouldn't we.

Thanks for fully confirming. The strong Grealish links coming so soon after made me think that was possibly one of the solutions. Having some under the radar stuff still is interesting.
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,173
19,679
For the next cryptic can I suggest using a GIF that’s related to the transfer.

The millennials will love it.
 

RJR1949

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
931
5,278
There’s a staggeringly good piece of ITK by Trix in the Grealish thread. Not giving names like most ITK but giving a real insider’s view of how transfer deals happen and in particular why they happen late in the window. Highly recommended.
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,169
There’s a staggeringly good piece of ITK by Trix in the Grealish thread. Not giving names like most ITK but giving a real insider’s view of how transfer deals happen and in particular why they happen late in the window. Highly recommended.
It’s very insightful. Hopefully should silence some of the seismic, shrieking meltdowns that threaten to erupt here every window
 

NinjaTuna

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2017
1,878
7,155
There’s a staggeringly good piece of ITK by Trix in the Grealish thread. Not giving names like most ITK but giving a real insider’s view of how transfer deals happen and in particular why they happen late in the window. Highly recommended.
Can someone please share it in here as I'm about 30 pages behind on that thread and don't want to trawl through it (y)
 

parj

NDombelly ate all the pies
Jul 27, 2003
3,624
5,954
I'm sure he does. Heck in fact I'm sure all managers would want the same. Fact is though we have a limited budget and it's not as simple as just "get them now". I have posted some of the issues in other posts but I will try and explain a bit one more time.

When I refer to "the players" that can mean the players themselves, the agents, their family members, and more often than not a combination of all three.

A club like ours will compile a shortlist of players that fit the need for the club. The players are no different. They will have their own list of clubs they would like to go to.....
boyhood clubs
playing time
great manager and/or players
CL football
location
financials
etc etc.

We make our interest known to the selling club and agent, and the absolute first thing they do is look to see if they can do better elsewhere(that's their job). This might take time, for numerous reasons....

A preferred club is interested but needs to sell first,
the club has an alternative they would prefer but strings the player along just in case
Difference of opinion on the transfer fee/wages between the buying club and selling club/agent
Or like now an upcoming world cup which could change the desire in their players.

We are not top of the food chain(but we are not far off) so when we are looking at squad players it's usually a pretty easy decision from the players/agents POV, but the selling club is still going to look at maximising the transfer fee by selling elsewhere first. If the player is set on joining us and the selling club can get more elsewhere this will drag it out. Then the agent might think the other team will pay more = more delays. Then there is the players family that needs persuading etc etc.

The fact is in the early part of the window we are trying to do stuff but there are hurdles everywhere. In the last 2-3 weeks of the window the players/agents/clubs pretty much know where they stand. Other clubs are needing income to do their deals, players/agents are getting edgy and prepared to take less, and most importantly the Elite clubs aren't likely to force the prices up with their interest.

It's simple really, if we want players that none of the other teams would want it's easy. If we want our top choices then all the above has to align first and that takes time to happen.

Of course it is possible to get these deals done early ala Liverpool , but the fact is they are overpaying(quite significantly), both is Agents fee's and signing on fee's to do so. I'm sure there will be numerous posters now saying "well we should do the same". Firstly Levy does not operate like that, and secondly we have a budget, a transfer kitty a war chest call it what you will, but with everything else going on regarding stadium and pay rises it does have it's limit.

If we go down the route of greasing the wheels a deal which should cost £40 mil now costs £46. That's not just £6mil off the transfer fee of the next player. Well it's only £6mill, nothing in the grand scheme of things right? Wrong because when we come to sign player 2 his agent won't do business until he gets his Brucie bonus either. If Poch wants/needs 3 players in by the time we get to player three we can't get close to affording him and we are left short.

Now all that said I'm sure the nay sayers will come diving in with "If we hadn't wasted money on blah blah blah we wouldn't be in this position" Well maybe that's true, but our approach has been to buy lots of middle of the road(financially speaking) players with potential knowing some will work and some won't. You can't list all the flops without all the successful players either. Added to that how many of the so called flops have we actually lost money on, because they may not have performed on the pitch, but if they haven't cost us financially then they aren't really a massive problem.


Poch is very aware of how things work. If he wants his top targets sometimes it comes at a cost as far as timeline is concerned.

All SC members should be forced to read and digitally sign they understand Trix post... Might reduce the amount of times we get a hissy fit from A&C
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top