What's new

The England Thread

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
Sorry, I forgot we are only allowed scapegoats from other clubs. Because that's all you were doing. What does Dier do better than Henderson that would improve a game like this? Better movement ? More incisive passing ? Quicker tempo ? More dynamic ?

Calling for Dier to play instead of Henderson is nothing but childish Spurs bias, and it's tedious.


Dier is better defensively, he tracks runners, is better positionally and he is stronger in the air and tackle
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,561
Our midfield options shouldn't be Winks, Dier or Henderson though. We should have more than three players to choose from.

Dier, Henderson, Winks, Alli, Lallana, Barkley, Delph, Wilshere, even people like Drinkwater, Tom Carroll, Loftus-Cheek, Shelvey, Surman, even pensioners like Carrick, or those coming through at youth level led by the likes of Onomah.

That's just plucking some names off the top of my head. Most of those names might not be very exciting, they might indeed be bang average and will never amount to much, and most people would think 'wtf how are they international players?'..... But there are options out there to play people offering a mix of qualities in their proper positions and to attempt to play progressive, pass and move football whether we win, lose or draw but at least more aesthetically pleasing than the last few games (which is what the England set-up repeatedly tell us is the aim).

England still try and shoehorn 'the best' people in to the team, so you get silly unbalanced bollocks like three erratic wingers playing the other night, or similarly not making a choice between Alli/Rashford tonight and so putting them both in and having the same sort of (abilities and) flaws and tendencies in a crucial area of the pitch. England probably need to look further down the food chain and make logical selections until they ever get development paths sorted and players coming through, rather than trying to force square pegs into round holes.
 
Last edited:

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
Didn't Henderson create the best two chances in the match? The knock down for Alli when he was fouled for the penalty and the cross for Dele's header that he put wide.
Not disputing this. I am referring to the safe passing and overall turgid play. removing Henderson would open space for Winks to pass and drive into.
 

Buggsy61

Washed Up Member
Aug 31, 2012
5,645
9,061
I agree with Hoddle there. We struggle to break most teams down so we need to learn to play a different way.
Would much rather have Hoddle than Southgate next summer and that's genuinely with no pro Spurs bias. I think he knows how to set up a team better than Gareth. Hate to say it but I think we can already write the script for next summer.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
Dier, Henderson, Winks, Alli, Lallana, Barkley, Delph, Wilshere, even people like Drinkwater, Tom Carroll, Loftus-Cheek, Shelvey, Surman, even pensioners like Carrick, or those coming through at youth level led by the likes of Onomah.

That's just plucking some names off the top of my head. Most of those names might not be very exciting, they might indeed be bang average and will never amount to much, and most people would think 'wtf how are they international players?'..... But there are options out there to play people offering a mix of qualities in their proper positions and to attempt to play progressive, pass and move football whether we win, lose or draw but at least more aesthetically pleasing than the last few games (which is what the England set-up repeatedly tell us is the aim).

England still try and shoehorn 'the best' people in to the team, so you get silly unbalanced bollocks like three erratic wingers playing the other night, or similarly not making a choice between Alli/Rashford tonight and so putting them both in and having the same sort of (abilities and) flaws and tendencies tonight. England probably need to look further down the food chain and make logical selections until they ever get development paths sorted and players coming through, rather than trying to force square pegs into round holes.

Yeah, I meant in this squad rather than English players in general. I'd forgotten about The Ox and Livermore being in the squad though. I will say in Southgates defence that we've got a lot of injuries at the moment and the team would probably look quite different with Lallana in it.

I still haven't seen any sign of progress on the pitch since Southgate took over though. I'm sure a lot of us said we'd be willing to take a few defeats if it meant that we started to play with pride and purpose, but I haven't seen any of that yet.
 

Bus-Conductor

SC Supporter
Oct 19, 2004
39,837
50,713
I feel that this is a reason for Dier. Henderson carries the conceit that he is in fact a footballer when everyone can see he is not. His 'dynamism' does not include passing that is incisive nor accurate. Dier would at least sit and give Winks the security to roam and take chances.


Winks was doing that anyway, in a 2cm system against a bus park of mediocre footballers the last thing that England team needed was a CM in that two "sitting". It needed two players to be dynamic and take a little more risk, and at least Henderson does that a bit better than Dier and is used to playing a quick tempo, pressing system feeding fast forwards
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,561
Yeah, I meant in this squad rather than English players in general. I'd forgotten about The Ox and Livermore being in the squad though. I will say in Southgates defence that we've got a lot of injuries at the moment and the team would probably look quite different with Lallana in it.

I still haven't seen any sign of progress on the pitch since Southgate took over though. I'm sure a lot of us said we'd be willing to take a few defeats if it meant that we started to play with pride and purpose, but I haven't seen any of that yet.

I too have sympathy with him as I have said before - there aren't many options at all in that No.10 role and an injury to Lallana leaves a massive hole.

But then I do blame Southgate for not working with what he has got/selected (as well as what's being coached - but that's a different topic). He carries on with the same approach regardless with little thought. When he's picked a load of erratic wingers who want space to run with, defensive midfielders, and central strikers, then how does he see them playing pass and move with fluidity? One thing I do agree with Glenn Hoddle about, as I said myself the other day after the game, is that, whether as a fan it's your ideal way of playing or not,with those players surely you sit deeper (appreciate that isn't easy to do against minnow teams) and look to play on the counter which is when these players have their best moments or old-fashioned wing play. But we just seemingly keep banging our heads against a brick wall expecting to eventually master it, despite all evidence to the contrary.

The England manager needs a lot more help from the whole of 'football' in this country, but the manager has also got to help himself and he isn't doing that.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,684
104,964
I agree with Hoddle there. We struggle to break most teams down so we need to learn to play a different way.

I've more confidence in hoddle coaching these players than Southgate listening to his commentary and Southgate's interview.
 

DiscoD1882

SC Supporter
Mar 27, 2006
6,962
14,757
I've more confidence in hoddle coaching these players than Southgate listening to his commentary and Southgate's interview.
I was thinking exactly this. Hoddles knows what he is talking about. And understands flair. And how to use it. Not these paint by numbers managers who are ruining team England. I want to gouge my eyes watching England for the last 10 years.
 

riggi

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2008
48,547
104,936
Well that's just rude...

IMG_1396.JPG
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,684
104,964
I was thinking exactly this. Hoddles knows what he is talking about. And understands flair. And how to use it. Not these paint by numbers managers who are ruining team England. I want to gouge my eyes watching England for the last 10 years.

I've never been one to advocate his appointment as he's been out the game for too long but maybe that's what we need. Someone who understands the game and not Southgate who is just another manual coached manager appointed by Ashworth and his jobs for the boys network.
 

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
Yeah, because that’s what that game needed, for England to be better defensively.


What does/did Henderson offer going forward?
Team always play with at least one dm no Matter who they play
For me it's either dier or Henderson, not both
 
Top