What's new

The FA and Premier League should have spoken out against Clattenburg

mawspurs

Staff
Jun 29, 2003
35,069
17,740
The FA's decision not to address Mark Clattenburg's comments on refereeing Tottenham's game against Chelsea in 2016 has been described as "negligent" by Patrick Barclay on the Sunday Supplement.

Read the full article at Sky Sports
 

TottenhamMattSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
10,925
16,007
I don't like clattenberg. At all.

But all he's said is that he refused to send any of our players off while we imploded so he didn't get blamed for spoiling our season.
Perhaps if he was in charge of the Watford match last week Sanchez wouldn't be banned for City next week and he would have sent one of the Watford assins off for any number of reckless challenges
 

greaves

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
6,118
8,945
[/QUOTE]

Matt Law says 'it casts dispersions'. It is this that gives me so much confidence in the article.
 

guiltyparty

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2005
9,023
13,524
Matt Law says 'it casts dispersions'. It is this that gives me so much confidence in the article.

Or complete lack of confidence in Matt Law?

It’s right. What’s the FA actually for? Shirking every big call it needs to make, seems to be the answer.

Can you imagine if he said it about Liverpool? We’d never hear the fucking end of it
 

HobbitSpur

The Voice of Reason
Jun 28, 2013
1,785
3,818
Or complete lack of confidence in Matt Law?

It’s right. What’s the FA actually for? Shirking every big call it needs to make, seems to be the answer.

Can you imagine if he said it about Liverpool? We’d never hear the fucking end of it
Well tbf the the only time in the last decade the Dippers have thrown anything away Stevie F""""ng G did it all by himself.

Fortunately for him no self respecting Dipper fan would ever blame Steeeevveeeeee for anything
 
Top