What's new

The Naming Rights Thread

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,883
71,188
The HP actually sounds good. “At the HP” has a nice flow to it. Not the lane but i’ll take it. Also, no red!
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,382
Is there any possibility that we haven't secured naming rights because the club would be easier to sell without them?

A prospective buyer may want to do their own deals in this area, rather than be stuck with the deals of previous owners.

Also, don't some owners who want to pump money into a club, use sponsorship deals as a way to circumvent financial fair play (Man City, etc)?

Don't know much about this, so just putting it out there...
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Is there any possibility that we haven't secured naming rights because the club would be easier to sell without them?

A prospective buyer may want to do their own deals in this area, rather than be stuck with the deals of previous owners.

Also, don't some owners who want to pump money into a club, use sponsorship deals as a way to circumvent financial fair play (Man City, etc)?

Don't know much about this, so just putting it out there...

Possible. Think they'd be happy to get a good naming rights to wipe out most of the short term debt or use it to help refinance the loans.

Just think it's difficult to get a good deal.
 

neilp

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2007
3,350
14,710
Is there any possibility that we haven't secured naming rights because the club would be easier to sell without them?

A prospective buyer may want to do their own deals in this area, rather than be stuck with the deals of previous owners.

Also, don't some owners who want to pump money into a club, use sponsorship deals as a way to circumvent financial fair play (Man City, etc)?

Don't know much about this, so just putting it out there...
The asset value has to be higher with a sponsor in place, otherwise any buyer would be looking for a discount as one might not be found at an acceptable level.
 

Toast

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2014
608
1,767
2017.JPG


EA.JPG



BH.png
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,335
77,592
Is there any possibility that we haven't secured naming rights because the club would be easier to sell without them?

A prospective buyer may want to do their own deals in this area, rather than be stuck with the deals of previous owners.

Also, don't some owners who want to pump money into a club, use sponsorship deals as a way to circumvent financial fair play (Man City, etc)?

Don't know much about this, so just putting it out there...
I'm sure it's more to do with the fact it's not finished yet. Nobody is going to announce sponsorship for a stadium that doesn't have a definite completion date.

I can see EA or HP as realistic choices given the technology being used at the new stadium. I imagine if EA sponsors it they would set up some huge E Games tournaments there.
 
Top