What's new

The Spurs Twitter Thread - 22nd August 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.

JUSTINSIGNAL

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2008
15,995
48,593
LLCG - I think you're in danger of getting hopes up by quoting people that are probably responding to the bullshit posted by some random WUM called Football Agent49.

This. It's just a load of schoolboys trying to call the deal first. When in reality they don't know anymore than us.

I'll wait until JJ or POTL confirm something before getting excited.
 

Spurger King

can't smile without glue
Jul 22, 2008
43,881
95,147
I always take this stuff with stacks of salt mate, you know that....But we can't police everything in this particular thread. I'm sure someone mentioned this Mulligan fella as decent before though a while ago and he backs up what you say about the WUM

Scott Mulligan@ScottMulligan82
Just to clarify, a so called 'ITK' tweeted the same a minute before me. I did not use he's info. I got mine and come straight on twitter

Fair enough. I definitely think it's worth posting in here. I was just unsure whether there was a rumour wave getting started, with one bit of misinformation sparking a chain of tweets and retweets.
 

Living Legend Colm G

SC Supporter
Jan 30, 2011
1,641
6,248
This. It's just a load of schoolboys trying to call the deal first. When in reality they don't know anymore than us.

I'll wait until JJ or POTL confirm something before getting excited.

In total agreement lads, but the point is JJ & POTL get posted rightfully in Daily ITK...............This is where them knobs get posted for others to take with as much salt as they like isn't it?
 

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
In total agreement lads, but the point is JJ & POTL get posted rightfully in Daily ITK...............This is where them knobs get posted for others to take with as much salt as they like isn't it?


...Yes...but lets not post crap from known wums and lets look at the twitter account of someone we do not know to see if the info looks credible before posting, We all want to look at info which might have legs.

Good example was from a month ago - saw great iinterestinmg rumour from a 'Spurs player' but when I looked the account was in existance for only 2 months, no tweets with other Spurs players. Guess what - not real. So I ignored it and did not post.

Simple checks befoe you post - ok ? ITK take with pinch of salt - but at least it may be true !
 

Living Legend Colm G

SC Supporter
Jan 30, 2011
1,641
6,248
...Yes...but lets not post crap from known wums and lets look at the twitter account of someone we do not know to see if the info looks credible before posting, We all want to look at info which might have legs.

Good example was from a month ago - saw great iinterestinmg rumour from a 'Spurs player' but when I looked the account was in existance for only 2 months, no tweets with other Spurs players. Guess what - not real. So I ignored it and did not post.

Simple checks befoe you post - ok ? ITK take with pinch of salt - but at least it may be true !

But this fella is no better or worse than any of the other "ITK" goons on Twitter yet most get posted. Again I ask how the policing of each individual is done? I think the "Transfer ITK" mug is a complete WUM, yet to another member he may be a decent source. No point shooting the messenger as I am only posting tweets into a "Twitter thread".
 

Pedro

Blue & Yellow
Jan 4, 2005
2,039
1,355
Trouble is it gets people excited, since people forget which ones are the WUMs, ends up in the other thread, and chaos follows. We should keep a list somewhere (first page?) of known WUMs to ignore. Also there are two sets of conversations going on over JJs tweets - in here and the ITK thread, getting confusing now.

edit: just avoid the prolific and blatant WUMs, otherwise this thread will be empty ;)
 

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
But this fella is no better or worse than any of the other "ITK" goons on Twitter yet most get posted. Again I ask how the policing of each individual is done? I think the "Transfer ITK" mug is a complete WUM, yet to another member he may be a decent source. No point shooting the messenger as I am only posting tweets into a "Twitter thread".

Therein lies the problem with thius thread, It relies on self policing to ensure anything posted has had basic checks and may be credible

Regrettably a number of people seem to think its clever to wind people up with crap and just post it.

I suspect that if some levelo of responsibility is not taken by posters, then either people will need to be 'authorised' (just like being an ITK) to post on this thread or the thread is not allowed on SC.

With increasing numbers of tweeters, the level of crap will grow so unless there is a level in responsibility in postingh I cannot see too many other optiioms.

Sounds like an old fart - but that's the alternatives ! :D;)
 

GlennHuddlestone

Active Member
Jul 28, 2011
137
142
I always take this stuff with stacks of salt mate, you know that....But we can't police everything in this particular thread. I'm sure someone mentioned this Mulligan fella as decent before though a while ago and he backs up what you say about the WUM

Scott Mulligan@ScottMulligan82
Just to clarify, a so called 'ITK' tweeted the same a minute before me. I did not use he's info. I got mine and come straight on twitter

I cannot trust anyone that is unable to fathom the difference between his and he's.
 

Living Legend Colm G

SC Supporter
Jan 30, 2011
1,641
6,248
Trouble is it gets people excited, since people forget which ones are the WUMs, ends up in the other thread, and chaos follows. We should keep a list somewhere (first page?) of known WUMs to ignore. Also there are two sets of conversations going on over JJs tweets - in here and the ITK thread, getting confusing now.

edit: just avoid the prolific and blatant WUMs, otherwise this thread will be empty ;)

Exactly. I hate most of the shite that gets spouted by this lot but I was under the impression that we post in here if we feel it is worth discussing. The problem, as we have all pointed out, is that who is to decide which dick "ITK" is any more believable than the next?
 

Schitzophonic

There's only one
Jan 23, 2009
862
1,368
Harry Redknapp couldn't fathom the difference. Wouldn't you trust him?

...Oh wait, neither would I.
 

marvel

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
3,475
5,873
I knew his bloody name from somewhere! OK........I take it all back and crawl back under my shell for the evening :oops:

Tbf though I think the Adebayor was his own opinion and this info is from a source he may or may not have. Just after that fiasco I wouldn't particularly trust him, but could well be wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top