I'm a big fan of this. Not even sure why.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...dline-day-LIVE-Liverpool-Manchester-City.html
Tottenham have also received a £23m bid from West Brom for Vincent Janssen.
And make £10m in the deal.Seen plenty of people saying Janssen's hold up play is good as some sort of key attribute as to why to keep him. It's plain and simple, we bought him to score goals, we bought him because we thought he'd be an adequate back-up for Kane, someone who'd chip in with a fair few goals.
The thing is, he hasn't even really looked all that sharp in the penalty area, despite getting himself into some good positions. I don't like writing off players too early, but unfortunately we aren't in a position to really bide our time with players - the reward isn't really worth the risk. So when you have a situation where you can swap a non-performing striker for a proven goalscorer, you've got to take the punt.
I'd hope we weren't selling him for a pint either!It's a world cup year. We should blatantly loan him out. He'll get goals for the Netherlands and his value will increasse. No pint selling him now.
It's obvious that Janssen has no future at Spurs, regrettably. We should sell- if anyone is interested, preferably for no less than we bought him for. Almost certainly too late this window, though.Given the number of games we should be signing Llorente and keeping Janssen.
Janssen needs to play. Don't think he would be comfortable being third choice.Given the number of games we should be signing Llorente and keeping Janssen.
he is pretty goodGary JacobVerified account@garyjacob 42s43 seconds ago
West Bromwich Albion and Stoke City have said no interest in Vincent Janssen of Tottenham more @TimesSport