What the pundits are saying about us

Discussion in 'Spurs Chat' started by eddiev14, Aug 5, 2016.

  1. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    Doesn't really help either of them though does it?
    If Smart isn't sure it's touched anyone, why hasn't he flagged for Kane to be offside when he clearly says himself that Kane was?

    Let's be clear, I am not debating the outcome, just the process. I get what you are saying though, Moss clearly felt he should keep his original decision, it's just unfortunate that the conversation paints both of them in a poor light.
     
  2. Luka Van der Bale

    Luka Van der Bale Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,776
    Ratings Received:
    +8,775 / 250 / -62
    But he doesn’t say he knows Kane was off. He clearly says Kane isn’t offside if Lovren played the ball, and he doesn’t know if Lovren touched the ball. Thus he doesn’t know whether Kane is offside or not, so he doesn’t flag.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    uhhhh.... I really think you are missing the point!! It's not about justice, who benefited etc... it's about highlighting the state of refereeing and a discussion about ensuring we use VAR going forward. Of course Liverpool ultimately got momentum after Kane's poor kick, but if he scores and we win, then we would have benefited from what appears to be a poor decision, even if it was the right one. Can one not discuss that separately from the teams involved?
     
  4. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    Um no...
    Smart: ‘If he’s not touched the ball, it is offside, so you’re chalking off the penalty. It has to be offside if Lovren has not touched the ball.’

    So, if Smart is unsure if any Liverpool player has touched the ball, he should have his flag up for offside, WHICH Moss can then ignore and state that Lovren played him on. Neither of them knew for sure though, and thus no penalty should ever be awarded on a guess.

    If Moss doesn't know, nor the linesman, Moss should take the advice of his linesman and retrospectively claim that Kane was offside. Obviously the result would have been we would have been denied a legitimate penalty, which would have sucked at that moment. ironically, we might have gone on to win as momentum was still with us, but that's a side issue for me, I am only debating the logic behind the decision.
     
  5. Luka Van der Bale

    Luka Van der Bale Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,776
    Ratings Received:
    +8,775 / 250 / -62
    This is stupid. You’re selectively picking part of his quote. Smart clearly had an idea that Lovren may have touched the ball, but can’t be sure. The sensible thing to do is to keep his flag down, let play continue, and discuss with the referee after. If he puts up his flag and Moss blows, they can’t reverse that decision and give the penalty. They can always decide later it was actually offside. You’re honestly the only person I’ve seen way the linesman was in the wrong - everyone to a man agrees he did a fantastic job in this instance, bitter Liverpool fans on Twitter notwithstanding.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • WTF!? WTF!? x 1
  6. yiddopaul

    yiddopaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,539
    Ratings Received:
    +2,573 / 72 / -38
    We got two pens. Legitimately. No-one dived or cheated. If the lino made a mistake (which he didn't), that's not our fault. Even IF it was not a pen (which it was), so what, who cares. It went our way, which never used to happen. I don't care. Can we all move on from this.

    The real travesty, is that we didn't get what we deserved. All three points.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. easley91

    easley91 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,402
    Ratings Received:
    +8,247 / 130 / -89
    Sorry, but how was it a ‘poor’ decision when it was the correct one? Sure, it took time to get there but one way or another the officials got there. I’m not bothered by lengthy discussions, or linesmen overruling refs IF in the end the CORRECT decision is made regardless of the result.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    That's what I am debating, a broken clock tells the right time twice a day... it's fine, people are clearly too riled up by bitter Liverpudlians to discuss so I will drop it, I was just stating my opinion that from what i witnessed, I had very little confidence that an informed decision was made, even if it was the right one and I care because the next time, we could be on the receiving end of a stupid one.
     
  9. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    Absolutely not... however, I do agree that a linesman who is not 100% sure, should not raise his flag and that in general I actually agree that the linesman did a good job. I applaud also the fact they discussed the issue. I actually only really question Moss's decision because if his linesman clearly states Kane IS offside unless Moss is sure a Liverpool player (namely Lovren) touched the ball. The fact is that Moss clearly did not think either could prove either way what happened and kept his original decision. I am not sure I agree with that approach, but there we go, let's move on.
     
  10. $hoguN

    $hoguN Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    21,204
    Ratings Received:
    +17,698 / 452 / -147
    There is nothing wrong with the conversation. The linesman clearly articulates the rule, the ref says he is not sure that Lovren has touched it, but as neither can conclusively overturn the decision, it stands and the penalty is awarded. It’s not inept, it’s not bad refereeing. If it is anything it is a clear application of the rules.

    It’s exactly like an umpires call decision in cricket or a “is there any reason I cannot award the try” decision in rugby union. The soft signal stands unless it can be conclusively overruled, like the linesman did for the second penalty decision.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  11. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    3,021
    Ratings Received:
    +6,304 / 67 / -12
    Of course you can.

    But in the context of the howls of indignant outrage still coming from Liverpool supporters and some pundits, it might be helpful if more people first acknowledged that no one was cheated, no one lost out.

    That, after all, is the framework in which the protests exist because let’s not kid ourselves, they are protests fuelled by a misplaced sense of injustice, not a pure, dispassionate and balanced interest in the way in which referees settle difficult decisions.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  12. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    Yeah it's all cool, I find the debate on it interesting.
     
  13. mil1lion

    mil1lion Bad Banter

    Messages:
    29,854
    Media:
    4
    Albums:
    1
    Ratings Received:
    +21,668 / 321 / -80
    So you dont think the ref should consult with the 4th official if he isn't sure? Then what is the 4th official there for?
     
  14. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    It's the asking for TV evidence that I think has riled up the journos. Certainly as yet no TV evidence should be used to make decisions,so it was an odd request for Moss to make, irrespective of what I think.
     
  15. mil1lion

    mil1lion Bad Banter

    Messages:
    29,854
    Media:
    4
    Albums:
    1
    Ratings Received:
    +21,668 / 321 / -80
    But the 4th official didn't see it on the tv monitors it was confirmed so there was no TV evidence used. So in this case the ref asked the 4th official and then said he was giving it. I just dont know what the 4th official said but he must have thought it was a penalty given the decision by the ref.
     
  16. Riandor

    Riandor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    7,563
    Ratings Received:
    +7,512 / 117 / -27
    I honestly think it's just the words used ("did you see anything on the TV"), I think if Moss just radios the 4th official and asks for an opinion, less would have been made out of it.
     
  17. mil1lion

    mil1lion Bad Banter

    Messages:
    29,854
    Media:
    4
    Albums:
    1
    Ratings Received:
    +21,668 / 321 / -80
    Actually I just saw a report which says the 4th official didn't give any decision but the ref gave it anyway. In which case the ref was wrong to 'guess' that Lovren touched the ball but got 'lucky' in that it was the correct decision. He probably shouldn't make that decision given he wasn't sure as you say. If he didn't give the penalty we would have continued to dominate and likely to go on and win the game. The decision probably cost us in the end. We were robbed!
     
  18. dk-yid

    dk-yid Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,309
    Ratings Received:
    +4,588 / 114 / -39
    All this talk of the decisions, penalties and offsides is getting boring....
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. Shadydan

    Shadydan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    17,672
    Ratings Received:
    +39,497 / 1,021 / -402
    And it's massively off topic, it's being discussed in the match thread where it should stay.
     
  20. dk-yid

    dk-yid Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,309
    Ratings Received:
    +4,588 / 114 / -39
    Being discussed all over the place....
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page