- Thread starter
- #41
It doesn't apply to denying a goal by handling because it's blatant cheating. Otherwise a defender could save the ball like Suarez on the line and only get a yellow card.
World Cup Discussion Thread - Day 6 (19 June)
- Thread starter cwy21
- Start date
It doesn't apply to denying a goal by handling because it's blatant cheating. Otherwise a defender could save the ball like Suarez on the line and only get a yellow card.
gloriousbillynich
Active Member
- May 24, 2016
- 668
- 1,126
Wrong. Davinson did not telepathically make his team mate commit the foul, did he! Obviously it was very poor from Davinson, but no, he did not cause the red. Don't be silly.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
He didn't make his mate handball it. How fucking hard is that to understand?
wirE
I'm a well-known member
- Sep 27, 2005
- 4,676
- 5,582
Calm down, boys. Let's agree to disagree.
It would not have happened if Sanchez didnt completely fuck up. The red card was an effect of that. Therefore it was a cause the action. Not hard to understand
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,682
- 104,959
Crazy amount of penalties at this World Cup
It was a cause of the action. Stop trying to deny that.
Gassin's finest
C'est diabolique
- May 12, 2010
- 37,590
- 88,396
Colombia just falling over all over the shop now
D
Deleted member 27995
Sanchez didn't make Sanchez take a red and give a pen did he?
No, no he didn't. You just want to argue because that's what you do. My fucking god it's hard work with some posters on here sometimes.
Rocksuperstar
Isn't this fun? Isn't fun the best thing to have?
- Jun 6, 2005
- 53,359
- 66,946
If Davinson is to blame, then Davinson = sith.
He cocked up but certainly wasn't the one who made the defender stick his hand in the way. Life goes on, plenty of time for them to get goals back and, as of the last couple of minutes, Colombia don't sound like they're going to close up shop.
He cocked up but certainly wasn't the one who made the defender stick his hand in the way. Life goes on, plenty of time for them to get goals back and, as of the last couple of minutes, Colombia don't sound like they're going to close up shop.
gloriousbillynich
Active Member
- May 24, 2016
- 668
- 1,126
Again, incorrect. The penalty happened because the idiot stuck his arm out. That's it, goodbye, the end. Sanchez being poor did not make the guy handball it.
hughy
I'm SUPER cereal.
- Nov 18, 2007
- 31,915
- 57,116
If they finish second and England win their group that would be great.
Its hard work being right and trying to reason with people denying it because hes spurs. The hand ball would not have happened if Davinson didnt completely fuck up. That is a fact. Therefore, his fuck up is an indirect cause of the action. Cause and effect. I cannot believe people refuse to get that
gloriousbillynich
Active Member
- May 24, 2016
- 668
- 1,126
That early goal could make this game a cracker. Japan aren't a team set up to stick 11 men behind the ball, and columbia will have to come out and have a go.
His fuck up is absolutely an indirect cause of the handball. Are you serious?
gloriousbillynich
Active Member
- May 24, 2016
- 668
- 1,126
How would you know it's hard work being right? You've never been right in your life, have you!
You're being stupid. By your illogical logic, the next time we give away a penalty, say Sanchez hacks someone down in the box, it will be Dele's fault for not stopping the guy who gets hacked, 10 yards further up the pitch?
Sort your head out, please! And move on. It's ok to accept you're wrong you know.
Now, like the match, please just move on.
