What's new

World Cup Discussion Thread - Day 8 (21 June)

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
I don't see how that should've been a penalty at all. The whole point of the handball rule was to stop people picking up the ball and running off with it (I'm exaggerating here of course). If a handball is not deliberate it shouldn't be a handball by the letter of the law. The only grey area I think there is is when a player has his hands in an unnatural position and the ball hits them - were his hands there for him to move freely, or were they there to make it harder for the attacker to pass the ball around him. If the latter, then it can be considered deliberate and it's a pen. That's open to judgement though.

But you're missing the point, it doesn't need to be deliberate to be given, there's countless examples out there and this is just one of them - hence the point about interpretation of the laws by the refs/FIFA which means that there's a legit grey area.

That example is definite pen btw in my eyes, I don't see how it can be argued differently, advantage has been taken away from the attacker, that's my point here it's all well and good shouting unintentional but if the advantage gets taken away from the attacker then it's unfair on them, you need to see it from both sides.

No black and white answer here and I can accept both sides of the argument.
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
Evra by chance?

Untitled_1.jpg
 
D

Deleted member 27995

Deschamps doesn’t believe in proper full backs apparently. Same with the first game.
Thought Pavet looked a good footballer, but uncomfortable at right back which is a shame.

Edit: Pavard - thanks for the correction. :LOL:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

stonecolddeanaustin

Well-Known Member
Aug 27, 2011
1,631
2,607
But you're missing the point, it doesn't need to be deliberate to be given, there's countless examples out there and this is just one of them - hence the point about interpretation of the laws by the refs/FIFA which means that there's a legit grey area.

That example is definite pen btw in my eyes, I don't see how it can be argued differently, advantage has been taken away from the attacker, that's my point here it's all well and good shouting unintentional but if the advantage gets taken away from the attacker then it's unfair on them, you need to see it from both sides.

No black and white answer here and I can accept both sides of the argument.

You're missing my point, I'm talking about the rules of football, not how some refs choose to interpret them. Have a look through this and show me one place where it says anything about a non-deliberate handball. Every time it mentions "handles the ball" the word deliberate is also used.

https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/generic/81/42/36/lawsofthegame_2011_12_en.pdf

Anyway, France v Peru on soon so let's leave it at that.
 

Bus-Conductor

SC Supporter
Oct 19, 2004
39,837
50,713
I’ve worked out that if I fast forward any time Australia, Jorgensen or Braithwaite have the ball i run minimum risk of missing anything inspirational and might just get to watch the France game live.
 

cwy21

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2009
9,672
8,275
Every time it mentions "handles the ball" the word deliberate is also used.

You are absolutely correct. And the people who create the laws have said that what the Denmark defender did should be interpreted as a deliberate act because his arm was not in a natural position. It's not some random referee who make these interpretations. It is FIFA and the group that write the laws.
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
You are absolutely correct. And the people who create the laws have said that what the Denmark defender did should be interpreted as a deliberate act because his arm was not in a natural position. It's not some random referee who make these interpretations. It is FIFA and the group that write the laws.

It's a perfectly natural position for someone jumping.
 
Top