What's new

Zokora & Hudd just doesn't work

Goldman

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2004
7,087
2,141
Tried to give you some rep there G Levy, but it wouldn't let me for some reason. Good post, and i agree on all points.
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO:plays/thinks/eats chicken like sissoko!
Jun 17, 2008
4,974
944
--------gunter wooders huddlestone corluka
---------------zoks - ohara
(lenns.benty.gio)--(mod.bale)---(bale.gio.lenns)
---------------bento.pava
 

polski sklep

█ ██ █ █ ██ ████
Aug 18, 2008
354
0
Finally some are seeing what I've been saying all along since I've been posting on here.

[x] Dawson is shit. Heart on the sleeve bollocks who cares?


[x] Huddlestone isnt good enough and will never been due to fundamental weaknesses - cant run, poor positional sense cannot tackle etc...

[x] Zokora cannot play in a 4-4-2 formation. He is totally pointless in a flat 4-4-2.

I'd rather a team of "mercenaries" who thrive to be the best in their field than charlatans like Dawson, punching above their weight.
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO:plays/thinks/eats chicken like sissoko!
Jun 17, 2008
4,974
944
Finally some are seeing what I've been saying all along since I've been posting on here.

[x] Dawson is shit. Heart on the sleeve bollocks who cares?

[x] Huddlestone isnt good enough and will never been due to fundamental weaknesses - cant run, poor positional sense cannot tackle etc...

[x] Zokora cannot play in a 4-4-2 formation. He is totally pointless in a flat 4-4-2.

i see what you are getting at general, hudd should be a full back as not requiring such positional concentration, good idea (im serious!)
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO:plays/thinks/eats chicken like sissoko!
Jun 17, 2008
4,974
944
I'd rather a team of "mercenaries" who thrive to be the best in their field than charlatans like Dawson, punching above their weight.

dawson should train in a less critical position like central midfield, as hudd should train as central defender
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO:plays/thinks/eats chicken like sissoko!
Jun 17, 2008
4,974
944
But he cannot run nor tackle! These skills are pretty important if you are a full back.:wink:

but he could usher people towards the corner flag perhaps (im thinking lb) and stomp down the wing with intent, spraying passes andcutting in having shots on goal:)
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO:plays/thinks/eats chicken like sissoko!
Jun 17, 2008
4,974
944
Dawson and Huddlestone should train with Crystal Palace as imo they are not good enough for the premiership.

the hudd has firepower perhaps playing as attacking midfielder or off the front striker he could prove less clumsy and more dangerous
 

General Levy

Banned
Jun 7, 2007
4,295
9
the hudd has firepower perhaps playing as attacking midfielder or off the front striker he could prove less clumsy and more dangerous

The Hudd can be a good impact sub or a good CD when the other team are playing one up front so he has time on the ball to spray his top class long balls.
 

double0

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2006
14,423
12,258
Partly agree with to the notion that Huddlestone can play off the main striker. My view point on Huddlestone position of play depends on the opposition. He can not be paired in the middle in a two against high energy players such a Nigel Reo-Coker.

Position of play IMO not in any order

1) Three centrally with pace....ie Jenas...Huddleston...Zokora
2) 4231 formation Huddlestone can play off the striker.
3) In a back 4
4) Other variation where his covered in a three.

Under no circumstance in the EPL should he be paired (2) in the middle against high energy midfield's. We might get away with pairing Huddleston in a 442 in European games.
 
Top