- Aug 2, 2008
- 3,924
- 13,229
I'm thinking maybe sign him for nearer what City want (which I guess is more than £3m) and then Fulham pay us the difference from the £3m to take him on loan for a season. I think it's more about what City get for him from the deal and any sell on fee in the future. They know he wants to go but they also want what he's truly worth (which is fair enough).
Why would Fulham pay 3m for a loan of a 17yr old who didn't play first team football yet??
Edit: I realise you mean the excess of 3m. My point stands. It will still be 1m or more for a loan of a 17yr old. That's not gonna happen
Last edited: