Why is it a lesser fee because he's gone public? He's still under contract.
Why does he need to do this publicly? We all know he wanted to leave but the manner in which he’s spoken does not benefit the club in any way.
Or idiotic and misjudged. Eriksen would've surely known the reaction Pochettino had to Kyle Walker when he did similar. He's bound to have read Pochettino's book, too.
I'm not sure how he would've expected Poch to react.
A few of us called this months ago, his heart isn't with it.
I suspect nobody will want to pay big money for him which is a conundrum for everybody, free in 12 months and a discontented player in the meantime.
A few of us called this months ago, his heart isn't with it.
I suspect nobody will want to pay big money for him which is a conundrum for everybody, free in 12 months and a discontented player in the meantime.
80mHow much do you think we will get for him minimum?
Yep he’s done himself no harm - he’s alerted clubs that’s he’s up for a new challenge and if nothing comes along he fancies he’s probably inline for a bumper new contract - win win for him.He clearly states the he’s open to signing if nothing exciting comes around. He’s probably only willing to talk to about 6 clubs in total, I reckon.
This is true...he runs a lot and gets in good position to defend. He's good at finding the runner in the final third and if he has time, he can score from outside the box. These are great qualities that we'd miss. That said, he's not a good tackler, he's not good (in fact he rarely challenges) in the air, he can't dribble to save his life. He's very good at what he does but there are a lot of things he can't do as well. Good teams can negate his positives and he doesn't really have a Plan B when they do. I like him but I don't think he irreplaceable.A lot of people seems to think Eriksen has had a bad season. Let's not forget how bad we looked the few games Eriksen was missing or started on the bench. He makes the team tick and has a very special understanding with Kane. Also always work hard, almost always runs the most meters per game.
I'd be VERY surprised if we got anywhere near the 75-100 million being throwned around in this thread.
He has 1 year left on his deal and not as in demand as say Sanchez, RVP or Hazard was/is. I would love us to get those amounts, but can't see us getting more than 30-40 max.
I'd be very curious why so many think anyone will pay that much for Eriksen when they can get him for free in a year? Help me understand.
30-40 for Eriksen would be an absolute joke.
30-40 for Eriksen would be an absolute joke.
I'd be VERY surprised if we got anywhere near the 75-100 million being throwned around in this thread.
He has 1 year left on his deal and not as in demand as say Sanchez, RVP or Hazard was/is. I would love us to get those amounts, but can't see us getting more than 30-40 max.
I'd be very curious why so many think anyone will pay that much for Eriksen when they can get him for free in a year? Help me understand.
I'd be VERY surprised if we got anywhere near the 75-100 million being throwned around in this thread.
He has 1 year left on his deal and not as in demand as say Sanchez, RVP or Hazard was/is. I would love us to get those amounts, but can't see us getting more than 30-40 max.
I'd be very curious why so many think anyone will pay that much for Eriksen when they can get him for free in a year? Help me understand.
I'd be VERY surprised if we got anywhere near the 75-100 million being throwned around in this thread.
He has 1 year left on his deal and not as in demand as say Sanchez, RVP or Hazard was/is. I would love us to get those amounts, but can't see us getting more than 30-40 max.
I'd be very curious why so many think anyone will pay that much for Eriksen when they can get him for free in a year? Help me understand.