- Jul 23, 2013
- 3,610
- 12,552
Would it be unheard of for clubs to legitimately agree in principle on a transfer for the upcoming window, pending something like image rights? Or would that all be considered "rumor" until January?
Clubs? No. This club? Yes.Would it be unheard of for clubs to legitimately agree in principle on a transfer for the upcoming window, pending something like image rights? Or would that all be considered "rumor" until January?
Would it be unheard of for clubs to legitimately agree in principle on a transfer for the upcoming window, pending something like image rights? Or would that all be considered "rumor" until January?
Latest report from gazetta Della sport in Italy saying Juve and Inter have made first contact over an exchange deal Dybala for Icardi.
Don't shoot the messenger.
How would a swap between Juven
This has been mentioned a few times, but I don't understand how this solves the problem Juventus have with their squad being too big and needing money.
Good- keep him there until January then Daniel can buy up Athena retail chain and own all image rights of every hunky Latino everOn the bench again.
Itk mate or opinion?January we’ll get him..once those rights are sorted - as long as he’s not snapped up by 03/09
Yes but in all fairness it was a great volleyI watched juventus napoli was 3-3 and he won the freekick then koulibaly smashed into his own net. One of the worst own goals you'll ever see.
Yes but in all fairness it was a great volley
Opinion based on reasoning from all the info we’ve had, and throughout media etc..Itk mate or opinion?
It's in the bag I tell you, he's ours.