What's new

Premier League 2019–?

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
Lmao loving West Ham getting shafted, just a shame Chelsea are the beneficiaries
I absolutely do not. I wouldn't even love it if it was Arsenal, or we were the beneficiaries. It just completely ruins the game for me, these sort of decisions.
 

mark87

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2004
36,252
115,177
If it takes him 4 minutes to work out the "law" then it's pretty clear neither he nor the "law" know what the fuck they're talking about.

I know what you're saying, it's not clear and obvious either as it took him that long to decide so should have been given a goal imo.
 

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
Like what is the law that was broken there? Like I don't see anything wrong with it at all.
 

hughy

I'm SUPER cereal.
Nov 18, 2007
31,922
57,124
Not watching, who scored the pen? BBC says Willian, PL app says Pulisic.

Matters cos of bets.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,358
146,927
I mean it was a question of if Antonio was interfering or not, what the hell did Piggy Moss need to draw the lines for?
 

Phomesy

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
9,188
14,102
Like what is the law that was broken there? Like I don't see anything wrong with it at all.

neither can any footballers who are commentating on the game. That doesn’t mean there isn’t some strange law mind you, but I can’t see any reason for that goal to be chalked off. Mystified.
 

SpursD22

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2017
4,682
8,929
Now Soucek gets his deserved goal. I’ve liked him since the first time I saw him play for Slavia Prague. He was linked to Milan, he should’ve went there instead
 

philll

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
9,393
32,491
COME ON WEST HAM. There. I said it.

Edit - I've unsaid it. It was bothering me more than you could possibly know that I had said it.
 
Last edited:
Top