- May 19, 2008
- 1,575
- 2,389
No, but nor are we and they are direct rivals for a top 4 place. The more points they drop the better.
He played 2 days ago so knackered. They aren't robots.
He’s a ham sandwich.Absolute fucking bell end that bloke.
Might as well have been there sucking Fergie off.
massive transfer gaffe by us. Kane has to drop and do the job himself because we didn’t sign Bruno .
So Rashford's strike was a deflection into the Wolves net just like Salah's against us. They both got lucky. No?
16 games in . The table kind of is what it is.They're no way as good as their position reflects but all it takes is a run of results/some lucky goals and your right up there.
Other than Bruno, none of United's attacking players are particularly consistent. But thats not a problem because they have enough options they can rotate and keep each other competitive.
I don't think much to United's defence and it will still cause them problems but they can rely on 6 midfielders Van De Beek (still wish we'd signed him), Fred, Pogba, Bruno, Mctominay & Matic to provide balance and creativity.
Then Martial, Greenwood, Cavani, Mata, Rashford & James can all provide the end product. None are particularly on Kane or Son's level but they can be rested and can offer something different.
Jose really needs to give the likes of Bergwijn, Vinicius more game time and a different role so we are more dimensional.
Then Levy needs to go and add two CMs tp help us have a more balanced and creative midfield.
You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.This word lucky is such an oversused word.
You make your own luck. If you put pressure, if you take risks, if you put the opposition in a mess - that is down to you... not luck.
If there is a game where a keep makes 10 great saves and you lose, its not unlucky that you lose, you just didnt score and they have a keeper who made saves... its their job.
Luck is about stuff that happens that has nothing to do with you - taking a shot and yes it got deflected but the fact they took the shot means theyre creating that situation to happen...
If we did and we didn't get GLC, the same rhetoric would be brought out for him too. We'd also have the "not backing the manager" because "Poch clearly wanted Lo Celso" and so on.
We couldn't get both because we still had Eriksen, who we couldn't sell because no one wanted him etc. It's just irrelevant and moot from so many angles. There's not even a guarantee that Fernandes would even look any different than Bale in our team, not least because we wouldn't have had as many favourable referring decisions that have helped their form, which in turn helps the form of the individuals.
So Rashford's strike was a deflection into the Wolves net just like Salah's against us. They both got lucky. No?
his form is beyond scrutiny . He’s a phenom.
They are not Michu numbers they are Ronaldo numbers.
Thats what Im saying. If Cavani isnt a threat, they bring on others. Midfield is even better for options.[
The key is the amount of players they have who are a threat in the final third. As you say, they don’t have anyone as good as either Kane or Son, but it’s not necessarily relevant because they have Rashford, Greenwood, Martial, Cavani, Bruno who are a capable of winning a game. Plus Mata and Pogba ( when he can be bothered). Even McTominay scored a couple the other week ( something that you can’t ever see Winks or Sissoko doing). Maguire is also a thread from set pieces.
Even if we give more of our other attacking options more minutes they just don’t have the same threat. On paper they may look decent, but there’s a big caveat with all of them except Kane and Son.
We’ve not replaced Eriksen’s final third contributions, nor Dele’s for that matter seeing as he’s not getting any minutes ( for reasons that I do understand to be fair).