One paper today says Kane has told Levy let me go for 100 mil which if true makes me think city have said they wouldn't pay more than that. We know Pep wont get involved in an auction as has he said before so unless he or Levy change their minds on the value Kane might not get his dream move to City.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter RichSpur58
- Start date
sidford
Well-Known Member
- Oct 20, 2003
- 11,446
- 30,245
Liverpool would love to buy Harry Kane - but there are 120 million reasons why they won't
By committing to a six-year contract in 2018, Kane has lost all of his negotiating power - very few clubs can afford him
www.telegraph.co.uk
This sums it up well for me and are the reasons why I can't see Kane leaving this year
Accepted by who? No mate, not even close.
Wsussexspur
Well-Known Member
- Oct 2, 2007
- 8,918
- 10,177
If Utd wanted Kane this summer I’d take around £150 million + Dean Henderson for Kane. We are going to need a new keeper in the next 12 months as looks like Lloris will more than likely be off at the end of his contract. Valuing Henderson around £20 million in that deal which seems more than fair for a number 2 goalkeeper.
brendanb50
Well-Known Member
- Jul 21, 2005
- 4,488
- 3,896
Fair points regarding winning anything. As much as being a Spurs fan has a certain amount of optimism, that has been drained this year to very low levels. Inclined to agree with your view on this post, that a) if more money is offered now and b) it avoids a year of limbo and speculation it would make sense to do it. Just hard to plan with no manager ultimately.
My view regarding waiting, was that with 2 years to go (still not bad and with Kane i'd have faith he wouldn't run it down) and COVID hopefully 12months behind us, more clubs would have money at their disposal.
ILS
Well-Known Member
- Jun 21, 2008
- 3,803
- 6,913
But would those players listed want to come to us?
It's alright banding around swap deals but it has got to work for the individuals involved.
Why fringe players? If they really want him then it'll have to be a big name. If that player doesn't want to come then it's no deal. This is Tottenham Hotspur not West Ham.
Donki
Has a "Massive Member" Member
- May 14, 2007
- 14,460
- 18,981
Liverpool would love to buy Harry Kane - but there are 120 million reasons why they won't
By committing to a six-year contract in 2018, Kane has lost all of his negotiating power - very few clubs can afford him
This sums it up well for me and are the reasons why I can't see Kane leaving this year
There is a club or clubs who have already tapped Kane up, and told him they want him do you really think Harry would have gave that interview if there wasn't a club serious in spending that kind of money? I think he will go for about £130m with add ons etc.
sidford
Well-Known Member
- Oct 20, 2003
- 11,446
- 30,245
I have no doubt they have told him they want him but that's what clubs do all the time with players, they dont always sign them though.
No club is going to spend 130m+ on him, won't happen. Not even sure levy would sell for that amount of money. Could need 140/150m+.
He'll still be here next season
sausage
?
- May 17, 2018
- 11,872
- 47,993
It's just been lifted from the Neville interview - I think that's just an arbitrary figure they were referencing
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,707
- 105,015
Liverpool would love to buy Harry Kane - but there are 120 million reasons why they won't
By committing to a six-year contract in 2018, Kane has lost all of his negotiating power - very few clubs can afford him
This sums it up well for me and are the reasons why I can't see Kane leaving this year
I can't believe Carragher wrote that himself!
Far too spot on. Cheers for posting, a good read and this sums it up:
"Everyone is anticipating a fight between the player and the chairman, but the reality of the situation is this: Levy won the day he convinced Kane to commit himself to Tottenham until 2024."
They've taken that figure from the Gary Neville interview where Harry says something like "The chairman might decide he wants to let me go for £100m".
Those players all have years left on there deal. All currently playing (bar Ake whose been injured) good amount of minutes for best side in the world. They aren’t outcasts why would they agree to leave
littlewilly
Well-Known Member
- May 28, 2013
- 1,686
- 5,251
I think he’s always been motivated by Greavsie’s record. I don’t underestimate how important this could be when he weighs up all the pros and cons.
Liverpool would love to buy Harry Kane - but there are 120 million reasons why they won't
By committing to a six-year contract in 2018, Kane has lost all of his negotiating power - very few clubs can afford him
This sums it up well for me and are the reasons why I can't see Kane leaving this year
Spot on from carragher
Donki
Has a "Massive Member" Member
- May 14, 2007
- 14,460
- 18,981
While I appreciate your positivity, I think this deal will be done pretty quickly. City have much more to win outa this than just a consistent goal scorer, Harry is loved by the media and is the England poster boy.
shelfboy68
Well-Known Member
- Jun 14, 2008
- 14,566
- 19,651
Kane Is well aware of who wants him and who he wants just a matter of levy getting the deal done.
For the love of Spurs
Well-Known Member
- Mar 28, 2015
- 3,454
- 11,296
Idk I feel like that's just the price I've seen quoted lots online but now that I think about it I feel that was just pulled out of thin air unless Ali Gold or Dan KP said it before. Personally I think it's a realistic price post-covid, especially if Kane really pushes to leave which it looks like he's doing and no club will pay more than 150m imo.
You also need to remember that Haaland is available for 75m next summer with his clause so if we don't sell Kane now we might end up losing him for very little in comparison next window as a big club that needs a striker will just go for Haaland instead so it limits our selling options.
