What's new

Harry Kane

T-Bone

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2014
439
2,365
£150M plus Silva outright and Jesus on loan for a season or £200M in cash........otherwise Feck off!!

I actually never ever want to see that snake near our team again but i want us to rinse City just as much as I want that prick out of our club.
 

rez9000

Any point?
Feb 8, 2007
11,942
21,098
Football365: Tottenham fans have joined everyone else in seeing Harry Kane flaws.

Dont know what to make of it- is this a true refldction on hiw bad it is.
I'm sorry, we joined? We were the ones who started shouting about his utter lack of professionalism, his almost narcissistic levels of selfishness, his monumental middle finger to the fans who idolised him, first.

The headline should be 'Media Parrot What Fans Said Weeks Ago'.

EDIT: I didn't actually read the article - it's Football365 after all.

EDIT EDIT: OK, read it now. I get where they're coming from, but still...
 

HobbitSpur

The Voice of Reason
Jun 28, 2013
1,785
3,818
oh absolutely, however after what's gone on this summer with the kanes and city i'd be disappointed if levy doesnt absolutely take them to the cleaners with this deal

I think Levy, for all his faults, knows that City don’t want to be seen as a club who cannot afford players that they want.

And they seem to have made it abundantly clear that they want him.

?
 

ernest_lowrider

Well-Known Member
May 31, 2012
481
2,132
Brace yourself dozens more “I’d accept x million plus x in exchange“ posts are coming.
And all those ppl saying '160 Mil or 150 plus Laporte/Silva/sheikh Mansour daughter' are as delusional as City offering 100 for Kane. Any of them* is worth 50 easily.

*bar the latter
 

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,765
23,473


£150m is an acceptable number - hopefully this is true

The bigger question for me would therefore becomes: whether we want any of their (willing) players as part of the deal

- If Laporte is, I would...not sure he would
- Silva I would be happy with...not sure he would
- Jesus...well, if we were getting Vlahovic, I wouldn't...but if we weren't, I think it's a more difficult question, and I'd be more inclined to be supportive. Would we really otherwise be able to get a better striker in, let alone one who's already accustomed to the Premiership
 

IamSpurtacus

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2019
1,487
7,011
Just throwing this out there…

In Kane’s own mind, if he’d have have tried a bit harder and not been shit in the league cup final, helping us to win it, it’d mean he’d have to stay…

Now that there are so many questions about his so-called professionalism, it does make you wonder if his heart was really in the final.

but that also why I don’t believe for a second he had explicit agreement from levy he could leave if we didn’t qualify for the CL or win a trophy

it incentivized him to underperform - and would do the same for any player in his position

why would you guarantee any player a cut price departure if they had already voiced a desire to leave, and incentivize them to not hit the targets they impose?

it makes no sense
 

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,960
24,084
Would love it if we made noises letting them believe we're close on a fee...

Then in the final hours just say nah your alright, we'll leave it thanks. Leaving them with a team full of AM's and WF's with just Jesus as a (sort of) striker


TBH I won't be able to watch City games where he is playing :sick:
 

kent brockman

Beware of the Daviesaurus
Sep 1, 2012
1,268
2,638
Apologies if this has been posted already but Football365’s Mediawatch take the Kane’s and the Torygraph apart. Quite an enjoyable few minutes of reading.


Have to say that the below comments from the article concerning Kane's unwillingness to submit a transfer request are hilarious:

Kane does not intend to submit a transfer request, even in a late attempt to try to force the move, because it is clear what his position is and what he wants to happen and he has even already said this publicly.’
"And there it is. The most openly disingenuous line in the whole sorry piece. The only reason not to submit a transfer request while engaged in such a naked attempt to leave is to keep hold of the loyalty bonus a player is entitled to receive when sold mid-contract. To pretend that he’s not doing so ‘because it is clear what his position is and what he wants to happen’ is to insult the intelligence of those supporters he apparently cares so much about. That The Telegraph allow this to go unchallenged is an insult to their readers."
 

TheWook

Here
Jan 8, 2021
1,020
4,111
Boy are they going to be confused when they arrive and Charlie’s pitched his 2 man tent in his back garden and put his Boy Scout uniform on :p
russel-scouts.gif
 

Montalbano

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2018
3,929
18,705
So we went from being in the market to sign a quality strike partner for Kane to now selling Kane and being unable to sign a quality replacement?

Nice.
 
Top