- May 8, 2014
- 2,403
- 5,937
An inside right that likes to cut in, creates and chips in with goals?….I’d say he’s perfect and a perfect rotation option for how we play.He's a good player but his skillset doesn't seem to match what we're looking for.
An inside right that likes to cut in, creates and chips in with goals?….I’d say he’s perfect and a perfect rotation option for how we play.He's a good player but his skillset doesn't seem to match what we're looking for.
Conte said he liked Rashford at the beginning of the window, didn’t he?Yesterday on twitter - they guy Midas who was pretty reliable said Conte liked an attacker that wasn’t Ziyech. It was deleted rather swiftly however, maybe have been sensitive.
Every other player we have been linked with there is a strong pacey dribbler.An inside right that likes to cut in, creates and chips in with goals?….I’d say he’s perfect and a perfect rotation option for how we play.
Get your point as well but we haven't done business with a club like West Ham since Scott Parker signed either over 10 years ago, don't think any signing between our three rivals will happen again for a long time.Its a very valid point, but if you take out the Roman ownership era, a man who Levy couldn't stand etc, its not THAT far back. Question will be whether Boehly/Paratici care at all for that nonsense, if it gets them both what they ultimately want.
Free transfer - same with someone like Gallas who joined after he was released by Arsenal, i.e. the club did business with the player rather than the club.Carlo Cudicini in 2009
I don't think its likely at all, but I think theres a chance because its a player a team maybe doesn't want. I don't think West Ham would have any issue selling us their dross, but we always want the best ones!Get your point as well but we haven't done business with a club like West Ham since Scott Parker signed either over 10 years ago, don't think any signing between our three rivals will happen again for a long time.
I wouldn’t count Ajax out yet now that the Ocampos deal has fallen through. I can 100% see them going back in unless Chelsea ask for something crazy. And I’m sure HZ would prefer to go back to Ajax and be a starter.Always felt that we should've signed Ziyech when Lampard snagged him when at Chelsea. I was gutted at the time and he's been wasted there. We were heavily linked and iirc Van der Vaart recommended we sign him.
Sweet left foot, quality player who's ability is now in question because Chelsea are weird and can't seem to work out who they want to play in their front 3. He would be a very good rotation option for Kulu, particularly if Lucas ends up leaving with his links to Galatasary.
Appreciate the whole "we dont deal with Chelsea" but that was under Roman. If Boehly wants to move the player on and Ajax deal fell through, we might be the only option.
Yes... but he came here thinking he could be number 1 choice on the right... ... if we say to Ziyech... "we want you as a back up to Kulusevski" ... I don't think his answer will be positive. But let's see.Kulu was back-up at Juve.
Oh, could we start that rumour? I think Conte could work wonders with Rashford.Conte said he liked Rashford at the beginning of the window, didn’t he?
Ziyech could likely get infront of Kulu if he was to give 100%, the guy is a really quality playerYes... but he came here thinking he could be number 1 choice on the right... ... if we say to Ziyech... "we want you as a back up to Kulusevski" ... I don't think his answer will be positive. But let's see.
He's a good player, perfect rotation for us and the type of quality we should be aiming for but he's nowhere near Kulusevski's level.Ziyech could likely get infront of Kulu if he was to give 100%, the guy is a really quality player
Well there's not a bloody chance we'd be saying that to anyoneYes... but he came here thinking he could be number 1 choice on the right... ... if we say to Ziyech... "we want you as a back up to Kulusevski" ... I don't think his answer will be positive. But let's see.