felmani26
SC Supporter
- Jan 1, 2008
- 24,697
- 43,870
More likely to apply leverage to persuade them
Tottenham Takeover Talk
- Thread starter Bluto Blutarsky
- Start date
eViL
Oliver Skipp's Dad
- May 15, 2004
- 5,841
- 7,965
Last time I watched the news (which I don't do very often) it was on fire from Riots. It's a shithole.
snakehipsspurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2017
- 2,225
- 15,688
For the love of Spurs
Well-Known Member
- Mar 28, 2015
- 3,454
- 11,293
Ok so we now have multiple sources saying something might be happening in regard to a takeover but we don’t know what it is yet.
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,696
- 78,602
In regards to a full takeover I do think it's likely but that doesnt mean it will happen at once. I can see it going similar to what ENIC did when they took over and had shares in Rangers. It will be a process of buying a percentage now and selling off shares in PSG. That wouldn't surprise me at all, I mean they would surely be looking at EPL over Ligue 1. This is the biggest and best league with the most money. I could see a swing of them owning a smaller percentage of PSG down the line and taking majority ownership of Spurs.
tony0379
The bald midget has to go!
- May 17, 2004
- 15,959
- 41,796
All this is probably naming rights
dirtyh
One Skin, two skin.....
- Jun 24, 2011
- 8,721
- 25,367
from poundland
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,696
- 78,602
Could be , its a bit strange we still haven't got a sponsor on the stadium so possible they have been open to the prospect of selling and leaving the sponsor free for the new owners
Albertbarich
Well-Known Member
- Jul 4, 2020
- 5,303
- 20,100
All this talk of sports washing is fine but let's not overlook that to anyone were a great investment
The best infrastructure in world football, based in London and a part of London that is about to be redeveloped, in the biggest league in the world with some mind boggling TV rights deals approaching.
To anyone wanting to invest in football I think we're the most sensible option.
But the issue you will have is with the amount it will take to buy us you aren't getting a Mary Poppins to do it. You will either get an Arab state or a ruthless billionaire.
The best infrastructure in world football, based in London and a part of London that is about to be redeveloped, in the biggest league in the world with some mind boggling TV rights deals approaching.
To anyone wanting to invest in football I think we're the most sensible option.
But the issue you will have is with the amount it will take to buy us you aren't getting a Mary Poppins to do it. You will either get an Arab state or a ruthless billionaire.
chrisd2k
Well-Known Member
- Dec 1, 2004
- 3,707
- 7,156
That would be great but let's face it we can't have nice things ?
arunspurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 8,902
- 35,847
I have done some checks on PL & UEFA rules and found something very interesting....on multi club ownership
UEFA rule is that you cant have ownership in 2 clubs both being > 50.1% . The legal entity cannot have decisive influence in the 2nd club.
In PL/FA, if ownership goes above 30% they have to do fit & proper test. And 1 person or entity cannot have > 10% stake in 2 clubs.
One interesting situation could arise If QSI had a 100% ownership stake in a non-PL European club (PSG) competing in the CL and had a 49% shareholding in a PL club (Tottenham). Then QSI would have a significant shareholding, as defined under the PL Rules (as it is greater than 30%), and would be require QSI to pass the PL FPPT, but the 49% shareholding would not breach the UEFA Integrity Rules. Both teams would be allowed to play in the same competition.
If PSG needed to win a match against Spurs to qualify for the next round in CL, and say Spurs in the group are not in a position to qualify for the next stage and if Spurs fielded a weakened team, just think about the specuation.
It is not clear what is a 'decisive influence' over another club's affairs. UEFA rules are lax& open to interpretation.
If this somehow materialise, it would be interesting to see how the deal is done.
UEFA rule is that you cant have ownership in 2 clubs both being > 50.1% . The legal entity cannot have decisive influence in the 2nd club.
In PL/FA, if ownership goes above 30% they have to do fit & proper test. And 1 person or entity cannot have > 10% stake in 2 clubs.
One interesting situation could arise If QSI had a 100% ownership stake in a non-PL European club (PSG) competing in the CL and had a 49% shareholding in a PL club (Tottenham). Then QSI would have a significant shareholding, as defined under the PL Rules (as it is greater than 30%), and would be require QSI to pass the PL FPPT, but the 49% shareholding would not breach the UEFA Integrity Rules. Both teams would be allowed to play in the same competition.
If PSG needed to win a match against Spurs to qualify for the next round in CL, and say Spurs in the group are not in a position to qualify for the next stage and if Spurs fielded a weakened team, just think about the specuation.
It is not clear what is a 'decisive influence' over another club's affairs. UEFA rules are lax& open to interpretation.
If this somehow materialise, it would be interesting to see how the deal is done.
ShriekinKnight
Well-Known Member
- Sep 5, 2020
- 291
- 3,261
Also worth noting they brought in Luis Campos this summer at PSG to advise their transfer business. He very famously buys players for cheap to sell on for big profits.
Could be a sign QSI want to minimize their spending at PSG and use those funds elsewhere
Albertbarich
Well-Known Member
- Jul 4, 2020
- 5,303
- 20,100
They have unlimited funds.
I doubt they're related. Campos is a really good hire and they got him.
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 27,014
- 45,337
I'll have you know that Mary Poppins is utterly ruthless in fact she is practically perfect in every way and with her this club's future would be Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
mattspur1986
Well-Known Member
- Jan 27, 2007
- 1,107
- 5,862
"the one who lurks in the shadows"
Bluto Blutarsky
Well-Known Member
- Mar 4, 2021
- 15,341
- 71,329
- Thread starter
- #1,699
So to recap:
There’s something happening here
But what it is ain’t exactly clear
***
There’s battle lines being drawn
And nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong
***
It’s time we stopped
Hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
There’s something happening here
But what it is ain’t exactly clear
***
There’s battle lines being drawn
And nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong
***
It’s time we stopped
Hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
SargeantMeatCurtains
Your least favourite poster
- Jan 5, 2013
- 11,765
- 61,763
JJ reappearing out of nowhere, dropping an inconspicuous winner rating then hightailing it away:
Similar threads
