What's new

Tottenham Takeover Talk

Would you welcome a 25% ownership stake for Qatar Sports Investments (QSI)?

  • Yes

    Votes: 655 65.2%
  • No

    Votes: 350 34.8%

  • Total voters
    1,005
  • Poll closed .

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,284
64,302
Leveraged buyouts should be illegal, they bring nothing but trouble upon the clubs that have been subjected to them.
 
Last edited:

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,679
43,840
Looks like MSP Capital have already got investments held in;
Estoril Praia
Deportiva Alcorcon
SK Beveren
Augsburg
 

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,758
23,458
This club needs a change. From top to bottom. I’m less negative on Levy than some, but we’ve stalled for 6 seasons now.

Time for a change. Fuck knows who he is, but I’m IN
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,679
43,840
In any case, this potentially could flush out other prospective buyers and ones which will likely be in the running for both Man Utd and Liverpool you feel.

Interesting times.
 

Nick-TopSpursMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
4,216
20,522
When people say the grass isn't always greener, this is what they mean:

The key part of that article:
'before adding about $750mn of debt on the club’s books.'

Leveraged buy out landing us with more three quarters of a billion more debt! Absolutely naff that. Glazers mark 2.
 

makeveli

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2012
887
2,080
Is there any point of thfc been a football club ? We are here just to fill the numbers in the league , we’ve become pointless .
 

Rout-Ledge

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2005
9,682
21,876
When people say the grass isn't always greener, this is what they mean:

The key part of that article:
'before adding about $750mn of debt on the club’s books.'

Leveraged buy out landing us with more three quarters of a billion more debt! Absolutely naff that. Glazers mark 2.
It certainly doesn’t pass the initial smell test for me.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,165
15,644
This club needs a change. From top to bottom. I’m less negative on Levy than some, but we’ve stalled for 6 seasons now.

Time for a change. Fuck knows who he is, but I’m IN
You do understand that this deal means we pay, as a club, about £250m to Levy and £500m to Lewis? And in return get a change to a consortium who are also explicitly about making a profit?

My personal preference is Levy stops having anything to do with football operations, but this really is not a worthwhile trade-off at all.
 

Nick-TopSpursMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
4,216
20,522
Honestly I know people are desperate for new owners but this would be a complete disaster.

The worst possible type of new owner with a leveraged buy out. Would literally be worse than what we have now.
 

Dunc2610

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2008
1,611
4,033
Yeah, whilst I don't like Levy, I also don't like another £750m in debt!!!! Look what's going on at Man Utd!!
 

wiggo24

Well-Known Member
Jan 5, 2013
5,094
36,825
If it's in the FT then it's been sourced and confirmed so will definitely be true. Personally agree with those saying this is the worst of all worlds - his net worth is only 3.5 billion, we'd be getting taken over by a private equity consortium for profit and profit alone.
 

Albertbarich

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2020
5,291
20,077
Honestly I know people are desperate for new owners but this would be a complete disaster.

The worst possible type of new owner with a leveraged buy out. Would literally be worse than what we have now.
It's so frustrating to have this genius of a chairman who has done the best job ever in building us off the field but he is still so so bad at the football stuff 20 years later.

We desperately need new leadership but of course as we're Tottenham we don't get anyone who care , were going to get the worst sort.

What is the fucking point
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,658
25,976
When people say the grass isn't always greener, this is what they mean:

The key part of that article:
'before adding about $750mn of debt on the club’s books.'

Leveraged buy out landing us with more three quarters of a billion more debt! Absolutely naff that. Glazers mark 2.
Every large purchase is either buying an asset with debt or taking on debt already in place. The repayment terms are all that matter.

The exception would be nation states who just don't give a damn.
 

For the love of Spurs

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2015
3,454
11,287
When people say the grass isn't always greener, this is what they mean:

The key part of that article:
'before adding about $750mn of debt on the club’s books.'

Leveraged buy out landing us with more three quarters of a billion more debt! Absolutely naff that. Glazers mark 2.

If Levy truly cared about the club and not just lining his own pockets he would sell us to someone who would take care of the club and not drown it in debt. Grass is always greener doesn’t apply if the grass is looking to sell the club to vultures.

If it’s a leveraged buyout and Levy/Lewis agree then they will have been as bad owners as Sugar putting us on a route to nowhere.
 

qqq1

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
580
1,972
I'm not his biggest fan but I'll take Levy over an American partially leveraged buyout. Passively damaging the club is better than actively damaging it.
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,899
130,563
My analysis of this:

Would the takeover increase our chances of competing with the rest of the Top 6/7 and winning trophies?

If the answer is Yes, then I'm down.
 
Top