Chelsea, on the other hand, have almost no assets in the form of real estate, etc while THFC holds something close to 2 bn in real estate and infrastructure alone and a brand new state-of-the-art stadium while Chelsea is stuck at Stamford Bridge with 40k seats for the foreseeable future.Wasn’t most of Chelsea’s fee, IIRC nearly half of the fee, the money Chelsea owed to Roman Abramovich?
I can understand why we’d be expensive, with all of the infrastructure and assets that we own, but £4.5b for Tottenham when that’s the ball park figure for Manchester United is an extortionate fee. It’s ridiculous and stinks of greediness.
If the bid is £3.1 billion and overtaking the long term loans, then the valuation is pretty close to the valuation of the club.
No, the new owner bought the controlling stake of 57% from majority shareholder. Najafi is still the 2nd biggest shareholder. The previous Suns owner is controversial and Najafi called for his resignation last year after some bad comments he made. Essentially, brokered the sale of Suns.
Wasn’t most of Chelsea’s fee, IIRC nearly half of the fee, the money Chelsea owed to Roman Abramovich?
I can understand why we’d be expensive, with all of the assets that we own, but £4.5b for Tottenham, when that’s the ball park figure for Manchester United, is an extortionate fee. It’s ridiculous and stinks of greediness.
Based on what knowledge?Here we go again... I smell more Bellshill. Think we be lumbered with ENIC for years to come sadly.
No knowledge just my opinion is that ok?Based on what knowledge?
Not sure it is necessary for the emotive language but the underlying message I get from this is wait and see, then read the details before commenting and I would strongly agree. The devil will be in the detail. Despite the views of many on here DL is no fool, not by any means.There is a lot more detail required before one can make an informed decision. My gut reaction is that if the deal encompasses the the development activities adjacent to the stadium the price is too low, using Chelsea as a yardstick. Their stadium is limited in its expansion capabilities. Ours -say no more! COYS!This thread has the most chest out, completely unaware opinion throwing I've ever seen on this forum... And I frequent the match threads!
The face of the takeover consortiums net worth is largely nil and moot, it is investment from the partners that is often filtered through a club through "complicated" means and I really can't stress enough it would be healthy for individuals to do a bit of research before putting fingers to screen on this one...
This would on paper see a more investment focused owner within the club which is what everyone wanted since day one...now it may finally be happening the amount of absurd opinions is genuinely mind numbing and you know the opinions I'm referring to, ignoring the plenty of healthy discourse in between...
Greedy, greedy ****s.
More needs to be done from the fans, to force them to sell up, make it as uncomfortable as possible.
FFS I had just learned the Iranian national anthem as well
The £3.1bn is with the stadium debts covered, the original article stating 3.75bn was in USD so if accurate they're essentially 1 bn or something off atm.If they spend 3bn and cover the debts on top it's not far off the 4bn though is it?
About the most horrifying words you could hear: "with sources convinced that Levy would want to retain his position, at least in the short-term, as part of any takeover"Spurs chairman Daniel Levy values over £3.5bn amid takeover talk
Reports claim Iranian-American billionaire Jahm Najafi is lining up bid for the club
Tottenham Hotspur insist they have not received an approach from Iranian-American billionaire Jahm Najafi, who is reported to be lining up a £3.1 billion bid for the club.
The Financial Times have reported that Najafi, who is the chair of MSP Sports Capital and has held talks over investing in Everton, will bid for Spurs with a consortium of backers.
Telegraph Sport understands that a bid in the region of £3.1 billion would likely fall short of chairman Daniel Levy’s valuation of the club, with sources claiming he rejected a £2.9 billion offer from a different American businessman last year.
It is believed that Levy values Spurs at upwards of £3.5 billion and, while not commenting publicly, insiders are adamant that Najafi and his partners have so far not approached the club about the prospect of a sale.
It is claimed, however, that Najafi and members of his consortium are already known to Levy, with sources convinced that Levy would want to retain his position, at least in the short-term, as part of any takeover.
Telegraph Sport has been told that talks between Everton and MSP have slowed down over the past fortnight, but it is unclear whether or not that is related to reported interest in Tottenham.
Intriguingly, Najafi’s partner at MSP, Jeff Moorad, held talks with Levy in 2015 about investing in Tottenham. Moorad made his name during the 1980s and is said to have been partially responsible for inspiring the character Jerry Maguire, famously played by Tom Cruise in the Hollywood movie.
According to the Financial Times, The Najafi and MSP-led offer would value the club’s equity at approximately £2.5 billion before adding about £620 million of debt on the club’s books.
It is reported that the bid would be structured so that MSP and its partners would put forward 70 per cent of the purchase price, while backers from the Gulf, mainly from Abu Dhabi, would contribute the remaining 30 per cent.
Tottenham is owned by ENIC, who bought their first 26 per cent share into the club in 2000 for £21.9 million, and run by Levy.
Agree with this, one thing I would say is that I believe Matt Ishbia, new majority owner, was the driving force behind the Kevin Durant trade and I'm not sure that Najafi had anything to do with it. Sarver was essentially blocking a lot of big trades previously because he was a tight fisted, cretin of a man that didn't care enough about the success of the team. Ishbia swooped in and on his first day as owner, rubber stamped a trade that cost 400m to pull off, or something like that. What Spurs need is an owner like Ishbia, who understands what it is to back a team and actually want to see them be successful in a sporting sense, as well as profitable in a business sense.It's fascinating to see how state ownership of football clubs have warped fans' view of what ownership should be about.
Firstly, every single owner bar the sports washers are in it for a profit. That goes for 90% of PL clubs. Levy is in it for profit. That's not a mark against any potential owner.
I was reading through our financials last night because I'm a sad, boring accountant but we had revenue of 443m in a year that we were in the Conference League.
Assuming that we'd be in the Europa League at a minimum most times and our commercial income should keep growing (especially if we sort out the naming rights) our revenue should regularly crack 500m.
Our operating income is 114m. We have 226m cash in the bank. We've spent 500m in the last four years.
We don't need an owner to come in and pump money in the club. Levy has done an outstanding job of building us up into being a profitable business. We need an owner to come in and give us direction and to do what FSG/Kroenkes have done and have a data analytics-heavy football operation with the Sporting Director/Manager in full control.
We need an owner who is not as risk averse as Levy who will raise our wages to turnover ratio from 47% to something more competitive without being financially destructive (something like 65%) while also pushing the boat out when we're in a position of strength.
I don't know much about this guy but I do follow the NBA as a sorry Knicks fan and the Suns are a decently ran operation. They've built a competitive small market team while making a blockbuster trade for one of the league's best players. The ambition is there at least but of course that doesn't transfer to football.
What we need to hope is that this guy has a heavy focus on data analytics who will support Paratici (or a DoF of his choosing) to revamp our recruitment department and allowing the football people time to implement a philosophy that suits us as a club.
We need that more than we'll ever need a sugar daddy.