What's new

Tottenham Takeover Talk

Would you welcome a 25% ownership stake for Qatar Sports Investments (QSI)?

  • Yes

    Votes: 655 65.2%
  • No

    Votes: 350 34.8%

  • Total voters
    1,005
  • Poll closed .

Bluto Blutarsky

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2021
15,289
71,163
Disagree.
Bid will be for Tottenham not ENIC.
Anything owned outside of the books of Tottenham Hotspur FC and it’s subsidiaries will be out of scope, and the “planning permission” has no significant value
Sorry I assumed you actually read the financials. The club hold those interests, not ENIC. And, having "planning permission" does hold value - as it firms up the ability to actually realize the monetary value of development, rather than an intangible concept of development.

Screenshot 2023-02-15 at 8.51.21 AM.png
 

Nick-TopSpursMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
4,215
20,519
Quite a shabby training base in Cobham? That isn't true at all. Their training ground is very good.

Chelsea also have higher revenues overall than we do. We clearly have the edge on Chelsea for match day revenue. Chelsea clearly have the edge on us for Commercial revenue.

The valuations of THFC and Chelsea should be broadly similar.

Wrong. Our matchday revenue AND commercial revenue were both higher than Chelsea. Their overall revenue was only higher due to being in the CL for that season while we were in the Conference league.

Our base revenues are now higher than Chelsea. On an even footing (ie. both in CL or both not), we have higher revenue than them.

We also have a £1 billion plus asset, our brand new stadium.
 

Bluto Blutarsky

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2021
15,289
71,163
BEN is saying 'not true' over on ftl, dont know how itk he would be on this

This falls under the category of "ITK we don't like" - so obviously then, more salt required... ?

Its inversely proportional - the less you like the ITK, the more salt that should be applied!
 

Ravenyonaz

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
234
340
I understand a succession plan but demanding anything beyond that would be ridiculous if true. If you’re gonna sell control of the club you don’t get to keep power.
He might keep his ca. 30%, but he would only keep his position as CEO if the majority of the shareholders wanted him to.
 

Spursmatty87

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2016
1,918
5,047
Having people with no footballing experience would be worse than having Levy for a while longer imo. Ideally you’d have someone with experience who won’t Levy it but ideally we’d have won the Champions League in 2019 and I’d still be on a bender.
Or someone with no experience would look to employ the best football people they could get to help.
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,052
5,734
If I'm reading it right it would be a partially leveraged buyout landing us with a huge debt, the owners would be investors rather than sugar daddies, and we'd still have Middle East links anyway? Genuinely sounds like the worst of all worlds?
You may be right but it doesn’t seem to suggest that in the FT report.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,278
64,264
Here was me thinking I was the only Suns and Tottenham fan that existed. Nobody else can be as happy to be a tortured fan as me, surely?

I've been a Suns fan since the Seven Seconds or Less era (Joe Johnson's last season or two), Steve Nash was my favourite player.

Book is now No.1 in my heart.
Surely as Spurs fans there's only one NBA franchise you could possibly be allowed to support...
 
Top