What's new

Player Watch - Tanguy Ndombele

ultimateloner

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2004
4,567
2,196
If I was Tanguy I would negotiate with Mourinho for a AM role; and score/assist a few. JM is a smart guy..he complains about lack of work rate, but if the trade-off is worth it he would start you (aka Hazard/Pogba but not Jole Cole, who didn't bring enough goals/assits to the table). It's the perfect time to do this..we lack firepower now.
 

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
Yep, it was not the 5CBs, it was playing with 10 men and one static passenger.
I also see that the Mourinho hating brigade has successful spread amongst themselves the “5 cb” mantra even though one of them is also best wing back and another was moved to midfield. But if can call it 5 cbs, our hatred is justified.
 

Ronwol196061

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2018
3,925
3,646
If I was Tanguy I would negotiate with Mourinho for a AM role; and score/assist a few. JM is a smart guy..he complains about lack of work rate, but if the trade-off is worth it he would start you (aka Hazard/Pogba but not Jole Cole, who didn't bring enough goals/assits to the table). It's the perfect time to do this..we lack firepower now.
It brings up a difficult situation. Lo Celso then would have to play CM. He can but he can also create. I think what's missing is a real top notch DM and everything else will fall into place.As of now Mourinho cant feel comfortable with the 3 or 4 players Dier,Winks,Lo Celso, Ndombele protecting the back line so needs ND or the others to step up or get a world class DM.
 

ultimateloner

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2004
4,567
2,196
It brings up a difficult situation. Lo Celso then would have to play CM. He can but he can also create. I think what's missing is a real top notch DM and everything else will fall into place.As of now Mourinho cant feel comfortable with the 3 or 4 players Dier,Winks,Lo Celso, Ndombele protecting the back line so needs ND or the others to step up or get a world class DM.

Yeah but your point is for next season..provided we can find a DMF that is.
As of now GLC should play CM as he gave us a grip 2nd half vs Burnley; imagine if it was a better team we were playing.
It's not a bad situation for Tanguy. One of the most recognized coaches has just come out to say 'you are talented but not giving us enough' which basically means JM rates him but thinks he is lazy. Better lazy than incapable (which you can describe for many of our players..)
 

Spurs_Bear

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2009
17,094
22,286
If I was Tanguy I would negotiate with Mourinho for a AM role; and score/assist a few. JM is a smart guy..he complains about lack of work rate, but if the trade-off is worth it he would start you (aka Hazard/Pogba but not Jole Cole, who didn't bring enough goals/assits to the table). It's the perfect time to do this..we lack firepower now.
He’s definitely in a strong position to negotiate with Mourinho.
 

Ronwol196061

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2018
3,925
3,646
Yeah but your point is for next season..provided we can find a DMF that is.
As of now GLC should play CM as he gave us a grip 2nd half vs Burnley; imagine if it was a better team we were playing.
It's not a bad situation for Tanguy. One of the most recognized coaches has just come out to say 'you are talented but not giving us enough' which basically means JM rates him but thinks he is lazy. Better lazy than incapable (which you can describe for many of our players..)

I dont disagree and you can call him lazy which in normal terms he is but because he generally (not yesterday) puts so much out there going forward I really think he is almost like an obsessive where he is intense with what he does but lacksidasical with what he doesnt favour. It's bad. But I like great artists and it's like they need strong supportive managers to focus them and respect their talents while pulling the most they can out of their talent.
It's a conundrum. Managers manage but are they totally obsessive with their own systems as well?
 

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
It brings up a difficult situation. Lo Celso then would have to play CM. He can but he can also create. I think what's missing is a real top notch DM and everything else will fall into place.As of now Mourinho cant feel comfortable with the 3 or 4 players Dier,Winks,Lo Celso, Ndombele protecting the back line so needs ND or the others to step up or get a world class DM.
Maybe. I suspect Mourinho doesn't "need" one CM/one DM in that modern way of splitting the CM work load on two players. But what he does need, is at least one large (both in strength and personality) CM to boss the rest of the pitch. And that he doesn't have yet.
 

mrlilywhite

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2008
3,174
4,992
I've a lot of respect for you mr L, as you've obviously got a handle on the dynamics of a game, but I have to disagree with your assessment.
I've gone through it pretty much in my previous post to Ossie, so I wont go into depth again. What I will say is that I completely disagree with your assessment that the tactic 1st half was to sit back and absorb. My take was that the tactic was pretty much the same as the second half, win the battle in the middle, allowing OUR backs to overload. We attempted that on a few occasions, only for it to break down, with Burnley then having the run of the middle of the park. This forced our backs to sit deep to cover, as them pushing up the pitch and us having no discernible central midfield, would leave us hugely vulnerable. As it turns out, it happened anyway, but you've already pointed out that more than a few had a mare yesterday, which I completely agree with.

The 2nd half change was again as I've gone through with Ossie. We won the CM battles because Lo Celso was far more mobile and tenacious in winning the ball back. Once we'd won the middle, the backs were able to push forward, even Tanganga was able to get down the flanks until Aurier came on to exploit the right further.

So in summary, the turning point was the introduction of Lo Celso with his industry and willingness to take responsibility, it was the catalyst for everything else.

I'll caveat this with this is all my opinion based on what I saw us doing, what I saw us trying to do and what we eventually ended up doing. I can respect your take as you obviously see it differently, but you've backed that up with an analysis, albeit one I disagree with.
Thanks for your assessment & touche with regards to mutual respect & your interpretation of what happened first half, however, you'll not be surprised to know that I respectfully disagree in part with what you have said. I think Burnley's approach has been underestimated and credit should go to Dyche for seeing the obvious flaw in our system and played his game against our obvious weakness, which wasn't one player but a collection of players in a system that for a good few matches has been playing the very same way as it did against Burnley.

Jose, irrespective of who is in the midfield has been making the same choices in approach for games since we accumulated the injuries to Kane, Son, etc & if he feels that is best then that is his choice to make and metaphorically he'll live or die by that I guess, but there is no getting away from the fact that he has purposely played a deep defensive line, whether that be to turn over possession and counter-attack or just as means to an end due to the issues of a threadbare squad. Personally I feel more and more that N'Dombele is not the right player for the role he is being asked to play, but I get Jose has no choice in that regard.

The first half has been done to death, but I could clearly see in the second that he made changes to the system that provided a better-balanced midfield. We had an extra player in the middle that provided better options than having two in the first half. It pushed Burnley back, withdrew their fullback options from attack to defend. Was Lo Celso key to that? Yep in part, he was, but the system change provided the impetus for our overall change in play & mentality, Lo Celso was the fulcrum of everything we did but had the system not changed, then I have little doubt, the outcome would have been similar to the first half, though Lo Celso would have provided more than N'Dombele, there is no getting away from that. My argument has always been primarily about the situations JM has put us in & not using a player that clearly has problems adapting, you can also make a case for Troy Parrott to a degree too, but that's another story for another time I guess.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,957
On The Athletic
Jose Mourinho’s scathing criticism of Tottenham’s record signing Tanguy Ndombele on Saturday night was about a lot more than just a poor first-half display. Sure, Ndombele had been disappointing in the opening 45 minutes against Burnley but Mourinho’s frustration has been brewing for weeks.

Mourinho, according to one source, has tried to be patient with Ndombele but by Saturday night, felt that “enough is enough”. On the other side, the confrontation was viewed by some close to the situation as confirmation that Mourinho’s management style is not best suited to getting the best out of Ndombele — a mercurial if not always diligent midfielder.

First, a quick recap on what Mourinho said at Turf Moor after Tottenham’s 1-1 draw in which he had hooked Ndombele at half-time. “Somebody has to realise this is the Premier League… I hope that next season, he can be fantastic because until now, it is not enough,” Mourinho told Sky Sports — without actually naming the player.

At his press conference a few minutes later, Mourinho eventually dispensed with any veneer of ambiguity and after saying: “My thinking was that in the first half, we didn’t have a midfield,” and defending Ndombele’s midfield partner Oliver Skipp, he went on: “Because I don’t want another question about the same story. I’m not going to run away and I have to say that Tanguy had enough time to come to a different level. I know that the Premier League is very difficult and some players, it takes time. Some players, it takes a long time to adapt to a different league but a player with this potential and responsibility has to give us more than he is giving us.”

Tension has existed since soon after Mourinho took over in November — perhaps unsurprisingly, given the type of player Ndombele is. He is a richly talented midfielder but one who relies on virtuoso moments of brilliance. He has always been less interested in the defensive side of the game and there were concerns about his fitness at previous clubs Lyon and Amiens.

He is about as far away from the Mourinho prototype as it is possible to imagine. And having been signed for £55 million by Mourinho’s predecessor Mauricio Pochettino, starting 11 of 17 games under him, Ndombele started only one of Mourinho’s first nine — the ninth of which was the Boxing Day win against Brighton.

Ndombele was not even in the squad for that match and afterwards, Mourinho said: “He was not injured but not feeling in a condition to play.” Six days later, having limped off against Southampton with a hip injury, Mourinho described Ndombele as being “always injured”.

The Athletic reported at the time that publicly calling Ndombele out did not go down well with some members of the dressing room, though others at the club supported Mourinho’s stance. They were in agreement with the head coach’s view that Ndombele’s attitude and application were questionable, going some way to explaining why he was physically not in the right shape. Soon after, Mourinho praised Ndombele’s “amazing quality” as he revealed that the Frenchman had been placed on a bespoke fitness programme.

NDOMBELE-WOLVES-scaled.jpg


Ndombele has admitted to finding some defensive duties “boring”, which is unlikely to be compatible with Mourinho’s style (Photo: Tottenham Hotspur FC/Tottenham Hotspur FC via Getty Images)
Fast forward to last Sunday and a tragicomic video went viral of Ndombele ambling back to try and stop Wolves winger Pedro Neto — barely breaking into a sprint despite Spurs losing 3-2 at home in the closing stages. Mourinho was asked what he made of the incident a couple of days later and to the surprise of some, he took it in good humour. He laughed and with a broad grin said by way of explanation: “Or Pedro Neto is very fast.”

Mourinho did not want to publicly call out the player again and thought he would be better off making light of it and protecting him this time. Privately though, Ndombele’s lack of conditioning was reportedly becoming a “big concern” — just as it had been to his predecessor. Pochettino started to have doubts by the time he left and a few weeks before he was sacked, raised eyebrows by saying it might take two years before fans saw the best of Ndombele.

By the time Saturday’s match against Burnley came around, Mourinho still felt that Ndombele needed to improve his conditioning and that he was not reacting to the instructions he had been given as quickly as he should have. His physical condition had not been great when Mourinho arrived — not helped by a groin injury carried over from the Pochettino era — and since then, he struggled to adapt to the new head coach’s methods. He has completed 90 minutes under Mourinho just once and in his three other starts under him prior to Saturday, had been taken off after 63, 61 and 25 minutes (the latter with an injury).

Nevertheless, with Harry Winks and Giovani Lo Celso needing a rest, Ndombele was given a rare start — only his fourth in the Premier League under Mourinho. He lasted just 45 minutes and afterwards, Mourinho explained precisely why: “More important than the tactics is to have midfield players that want the ball, to have midfield players that connect the game, to have midfield players that press, to have midfield players that recover the ball, to have midfield players that win duels, and we didn’t have it.”

These failings were a huge disappointment to Mourinho but what really infuriated him, The Athletic understands, was what he perceived to be the player’s lack of effort compared to his team-mates.

Was Mourinho’s assessment fair? It’s not easy to quantify effort but certainly, a look at two touch maps shows how much more involved the outstanding Lo Celso was when he replaced Ndombele at half-time.

Ndombele-touch.png

Ndombele’s touch map (above) compared with Lo Celso’s (below) shows how much more the Argentine offered

Lo-Celso-.png


As for Mourinho’s inference that Ndombele didn’t want the ball, connect the game or recover possession, the evidence suggests that may have been a little harsh. He touched the ball 40 times, which if calculated per minutes he was on the pitch, would have been the second-most of the Spurs starters, while his three possession wins had him joint third (though both figures were bettered by Lo Celso). His 62.5 per cent duel success was the second best of the Spurs outfielders.

But, as mentioned, Mourinho’s reaction was about more than just a sluggish first half against Burnley. And there are some who share the manager’s exasperation — one dressing room source said Ndombele has not made enough of an effort to adapt to the English game. Back in France, a prominent journalist told The Athletic that there was a perception of Ndombele as “arrogant”. This view was entrenched by Ndombele saying in December 2018 that: “To run after the ball against little teams is a bit boring.”

Yet there is another side to all this. One source close to Ndombele told The Athletic that the player requires more careful management and there is a sense that Mourinho is being “particularly hard” with him.

This was a sentiment agreed with by former players Danny Murphy and Ian Wright on Saturday night’s Match of the Day. “At least six or seven players were not at the races in the first half. It’s harsh to use him as a scapegoat,” said the ex-Tottenham midfielder Murphy.

“It’s pretty harsh digging him out,” added Wright — before making the point that it’s his first season and he should be given some leeway.

This is a view put forward by other observers, who make the point that he needs time to be in the best condition and find his best role in the Tottenham team. There is also an understanding at the club that joining Spurs at such a tumultuous time has not been easy. Adapting to the Premier League from Ligue 1 is hard enough at the best of times, let alone with a switch of manager and a team that is constantly changing their system and personnel.

Ndombele will likely need more stability and balance to thrive, and some feel that he would benefit from a more attacking role that exposes his defensive deficiencies less than being part of a central midfield pair. Tottenham’s more direct style under Mourinho — as was the case against Burnley in the first half — is also a long way from being the best method of maximising Ndombele’s rich passing and dribbling quality.

More broadly, he is far from the only player to get this sort of treatment from Mourinho. Eden Hazard, Paul Pogba and Joe Cole are other players with extraordinary attacking gifts that have been singled out in the past. As well as fears about his conditioning, Ndombele has also suffered groin and hip injuries that appear to still be niggling him and may require proper rest. His likely involvement with France at Euro 2020 will not help in his regard.

The question now is what happens next? Given the vast outlay spent on Ndombele last summer and the appreciation of his huge talent, he is a player that everyone at the club wants to succeed. Mourinho himself said on Saturday: “I hope he uses every minute on the pitch and every minute knowing what the Premier League is to improve. Many fantastic players in their first season in a new country; for different reasons, they struggle.”

Though he then added with a warning: “I cannot keep giving him opportunities to play because the team is much more important.”

The former Manchester United midfielder Darren Fletcher said on beIN Sports that he hoped Ndombele used the criticism as fuel to prove to Mourinho what he is truly capable of.

In the longer term, Ndombele still has plenty of time to do that and in the coming weeks, Tottenham’s injury problems mean that he will have more chances to prove he is worth the money and the effort.

He knows he needs to start taking them.

Seems quite a fair summary to me. Pretty balanced for them.
 

arunspurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
8,832
35,620
Having said all about his performances & Jose outing him in public....I do sincerely hope Jose starts Tanguy against Leipzig and motivates Tanguy to prove him wrong. He was imperious against Leipzig when he came on. The lad has to believe in himself & just give it all.

Jose does get under the skin of his players - It does works. Infact this very season, he gave a impression in public that (I am paraphrasing) he wasnt sure on GLC & he hasnt settled in even with Argie managers & players and doubted him. GLC then went on to play few games and Jose then came out & said he proved him wrong in one of the club interview.

Lets see what role Tanguy plays on Tuesday. Really hoping he starts & makes a big impact vs Leipzig
 

Ionman34

SC Supporter
Jun 1, 2011
7,182
16,793
I dont disagree and you can call him lazy which in normal terms he is but because he generally (not yesterday) puts so much out there going forward I really think he is almost like an obsessive where he is intense with what he does but lacksidasical with what he doesnt favour. It's bad. But I like great artists and it's like they need strong supportive managers to focus them and respect their talents while pulling the most they can out of their talent.
It's a conundrum. Managers manage but are they totally obsessive with their own systems as well?
Tbh Ron, I think if he does as JM asks/expects then we'll see one of the best artists in World Football. If he shows for ball in the same way Lo Celso is doing, he'll eat most other midfield alive.

I've seen posted on here, numerous times, that Football has moved on, usually as a stick to beat our manager with, but this kind of smacks of going back to the halcyon days. There are no passengers in this game, regardless of their talent. Look at what Guardiola did with Aguero. He questioned the work ethic of arguably the best striker the Prem has ever seen. Now he's probably a better player for it. Look at the talent that is Kevin De Bruyne and the work he puts into every game he plays.

Then look at the talent that Ozil is, and how little influence he has when he doesn't put any work into a game.

At the moment, which of the 3 would you say Ndombele most resembles?
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,957
Having said all about his performances & Jose outing him in public....I do sincerely hope Jose starts Tanguy against Leipzig and motivates Tanguy to prove him wrong. He was imperious against Leipzig when he came on. The lad has to believe in himself & just give it all.

Jose does get under the skin of his players - It does works. Infact this very season, he gave a impression in public that (I am paraphrasing) he wasnt sure on GLC & he hasnt settled in even with Argie managers & players and doubted him. GLC then went on to play few games and Jose then came out & said he proved him wrong in one of the club interview.

Lets see what role Tanguy plays on Tuesday. Really hoping he starts & makes a big impact vs Leipzig

He does and it’s why I don’t have a problem with calling the player out. We will see though if he’s more like Pogba than Lo Celso. I have my suspicions as to which way he will side.

I think there’s more chance of Parrott getting minutes on Tuesday than Ndombele though. It will be a few weeks before we see him back in the side.
 

Ronwol196061

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2018
3,925
3,646
Tbh Ron, I think if he does as JM asks/expects then we'll see one of the best artists in World Football. If he shows for ball in the same way Lo Celso is doing, he'll eat most other midfield alive.

I've seen posted on here, numerous times, that Football has moved on, usually as a stick to beat our manager with, but this kind of smacks of going back to the halcyon days. There are no passengers in this game, regardless of their talent. Look at what Guardiola did with Aguero. He questioned the work ethic of arguably the best striker the Prem has ever seen. Now he's probably a better player for it. Look at the talent that is Kevin De Bruyne and the work he puts into every game he plays.

Then look at the talent that Ozil is, and how little influence he has when he doesn't put any work into a game.

At the moment, which of the 3 would you say Ndombele most resembles?

I agree Ozil.
But does Mourinho have the nuance to be able to suss out NDombeles problem. I think it's in his head. I really dont know.
Would really like this to happen not only for us to be successful but to see the quality.I cant take too much more of the mediocrity all the way round.
Need some class.
 

Ronwol196061

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2018
3,925
3,646
Some of this text is crazy. I knew he wasn't a typical player for Mourinho in the first place, but reads like he also wasn't a typical Pochettino player. Why the fuck was he signed?

I think Poch and Levy saw what Liverpool were doing with their passing and attacking and they wanted to get us going the same way. I also think that Poch,apart from the injuries to players,wasnt there yet with this kind of system. I think Dembele was what comfortable for Poch. He offered strength that helped his pressing game,his ball retention game and his added strength covering also the defence.
Not sure why they didnt see ND's defensive frailties.
It's funny though if he was great defensively as well he would have been worth double of what we paid. You couldnt find those type players but nobody came in for him except us..that offered a clue
 
Top