What's new

Premier League officially postponed until 17th of June

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,682
104,959
I didn’t know it was that high in the EFL. Blimey:



Clubs in that division almost deserve to go under paying those kind of wages.It’s actually completely unfair on the clubs in division 1. How are they supposed to survive when they got up.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,476
77,998
June 8th and players aren't even kicking a ball in groups yet. Considering they haven't played for two months, there's going to be some very tired and erratic play if it goes ahead.
Business as usual for us then
We'll certainly be in the shit - no NFL and it's hard to see Amazon or Nike following through on the naming rights sponsorship if we don't get up and running over the next few months.
Unless Amazon buys it and turns the stadium into a massive warehouse
 

vegassd

The ghost of Johnny Cash
Aug 5, 2006
3,360
3,340
Those top 3 are significantly distorted by promotion bonuses the players received, which can be as much, or even greater than their base salaries
I think it's more of a demonstration of the revenue gap between the two leagues. That link you posted puts their revenue at about £17m so the 195% wages spend would mean about £33m on wages.

It also estimates a boost in revenues of £120m for being in the PL, so even if their total salaries doubled (new signings and existing contract agreements maybe) that could be about £65-70m on a £137m revenue which is more like 50%. Definitely goes to show the lack of parity and why teams in the Championship push the boat out so far.

The thought has just occurred to me that if Leeds are one of the current big spenders in the Championship in terms of wages and if (big if) they don't get promoted or just lose loads of revenue due to the virus, are they most at risk of "doing a Leeds"? Would be a bit awkward!
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
Listening to Raab today - I think the government will not stop the PL from restarting and now ive changed my mind and think the seasonw ill be restarted

The government need the PL to start i think.
 

McFlash

In the corner, eating crayons.
Oct 19, 2005
12,875
45,997
I think it's more of a demonstration of the revenue gap between the two leagues. That link you posted puts their revenue at about £17m so the 195% wages spend would mean about £33m on wages.

It also estimates a boost in revenues of £120m for being in the PL, so even if their total salaries doubled (new signings and existing contract agreements maybe) that could be about £65-70m on a £137m revenue which is more like 50%. Definitely goes to show the lack of parity and why teams in the Championship push the boat out so far.

The thought has just occurred to me that if Leeds are one of the current big spenders in the Championship in terms of wages and if (big if) they don't get promoted or just lose loads of revenue due to the virus, are they most at risk of "doing a Leeds"? Would be a bit awkward!
Sorry, I rated that funny purely for the thought of Leeds "doing a Leeds".
 

John48

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2015
2,249
3,143
Listening to Raab today - I think the government will not stop the PL from restarting and now ive changed my mind and think the seasonw ill be restarted

The government need the PL to start i think.

Maybe, but Dunne didn't follow up with "what affect do you think playing will have on the idiots that want to flout SD? If you play football SD doesn't apply?".
 

riggi

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2008
48,541
104,918


0F5AFD40-0441-4050-8D44-6B2A1725F0ED.jpeg
 

aussiespursguy

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2015
3,445
6,703
Just on the idea of shortened playing times - this is a policy already adopted by the Australian Football League (Aussie Rules) and has already had one round played before all sport was cancelled.

Obviously Aussie Rules is a far more "contact sport" than "soccer" but the principle has already been adopted.
And I personally hate it. Again going back to the purity of sport. Not a fan however if its a short term fix to get games back fine. Would not be in favour long term though.
 

rightwayup

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2011
351
1,232
Think that idea to reduce the length of games is a great one. To be fair though, all previous matches need to be reduced by 10 minutes as well and the results adjusted.....that would leave Liverpool with 14 less points ;)
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
The 2019-20 Premier League season could be cancelled if clubs do not agree to play in neutral venues, says League Managers Association chief executive Richard Bevan.

A vote is set to take place on Monday on proposals for a return to football.

The Premier League has been suspended since 13 March because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Bevan says "time isn't on our side and training needs to be in place very soon" for a return by 12 June.

All 20 clubs are committed to playing the 92 remaining fixtures of the 2019-20 season if and when it is safe to do so.

However, Brighton have said they are "not in favour" of using neutral venues because it may affect the "integrity" of the league.

The neutral stadium proposal needs 14 out of the 20 clubs to vote in favour for it to be adopted.


read more > https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52558225
 

WalkerboyUK

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2009
21,658
23,476
The 2019-20 Premier League season could be cancelled if clubs do not agree to play in neutral venues, says League Managers Association chief executive Richard Bevan.

A vote is set to take place on Monday on proposals for a return to football.

The Premier League has been suspended since 13 March because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Bevan says "time isn't on our side and training needs to be in place very soon" for a return by 12 June.

All 20 clubs are committed to playing the 92 remaining fixtures of the 2019-20 season if and when it is safe to do so.

However, Brighton have said they are "not in favour" of using neutral venues because it may affect the "integrity" of the league.

The neutral stadium proposal needs 14 out of the 20 clubs to vote in favour for it to be adopted.


read more > https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52558225

Villa & West Ham also opposed to neutral venues, so that's 3 out of 7 that would need to reject it for it to effectively bring an early end to the season.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,160
19,408
Villa & West Ham also opposed to neutral venues, so that's 3 out of 7 that would need to reject it for it to effectively bring an early end to the season.

Didn't Brighton or a team like that say they were against it unless religation was off the cards.
 
Top