Police took no action, but the club may now launch an investigation since the FA's one has concluded (barring an appeal).Genuine question, what are the repercussions for the 'fan'?
The length of time on the ban feels like too much for me.
Full report available here. Interesting points:
- It was Dier's brother who started the physical confrontation, not the fan
- The case was delayed at Dier's request as he attempted to gain access to materials from a police interview for evidence
- Gareth Southgate gave an unsolicited and extremely positive character reference
- Crucially, there was a point where the abusive spectator and Dier's brother had left in totally different directions. The spectator was also apologising to Eric both verbally and with his body language. Eric admits choosing to pursue him rather than leaving the stands or searching for his brother, insisting that he just wanted to talk - but the panel fairly concluded that this was unlikely to be amicable and that the fan was trying to avoid any further confrontation and had fled to the exit. This seems to be why they've found him guilty of threatening rather than merely improper behaviour.
- A comparison was made that had Dier pursued a player in the same way off the ball, he would have been sent off and banned. Entering the stands makes this more serious, and therefore a 6-game ban was the starting point before mitigating circumstances (e.g. the abuse received and the fact he did initially enter the stands out of concern for his brother) was considered.
Full report available here. Interesting points:
- It was Dier's brother who started the physical confrontation, not the fan
- The case was delayed at Dier's request as he attempted to gain access to materials from a police interview for evidence
- Gareth Southgate gave an unsolicited and extremely positive character reference
- Crucially, there was a point where the abusive spectator and Dier's brother had left in totally different directions. The spectator was also apologising to Eric both verbally and with his body language. Eric admits choosing to pursue him rather than leaving the stands or searching for his brother, insisting that he just wanted to talk - but the panel fairly concluded that this was unlikely to be amicable and that the fan was trying to avoid any further confrontation and had fled to the exit. This seems to be why they've found him guilty of threatening rather than merely improper behaviour.
- A comparison was made that had Dier pursued a player in the same way off the ball, he would have been sent off and banned. Entering the stands makes this more serious, and therefore a 6-game ban was the starting point before mitigating circumstances (e.g. the abuse received and the fact he did initially enter the stands out of concern for his brother) was considered.
Thank goodness for all that. We can all move on now.
lol yeah FA derailed our season in a glorious attempt to finish 7th
Time to bring this back out
View attachment 69927
Yeah, well we can all shout at him in his thread when he moans about it, I'm sure. Silly Jose (if he does)I’m sure Jose will say the same in his presser later ??
Yeah, well we can all shout at him in his thread when he moans about it, I'm sure. Silly Jose (if he does)
Just be thankful the ban doesn't go into next season, I remember when Dembele got banned for the eye gouge and it went into the following season which didn't help.
Absolute disgrace. Why does it take so long to decide, then ban him for these 4 chosen games! Disgrace! Football is becoming a complete joke.