What's new

David Brooks

Cochise

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
4,854
12,666
£25-£30m seems reasonable. Bournemouth probably know that but if they start the asking price high, someone might overbid the number they have in their head.
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
  1. Just because a player is played out wide by his manager it doesn't mean he considers him a winger/wide player or that he wants him to do what wide players typically do. It may be more just to allow him to drift into space and then attack central areas from out wide, collecting the ball away from congested central areas so that he can carry the ball forward to then pick passes.
  2. When I watch Brooks I don't see a player repeatedly beating his man and whipping in crosses. What I see is an AMC playing out wide in space to help him exploit that space and also probably to help him adapt to the speed of the league.

If he was asked, I would bet that he considers himself an attacking midfielder that should play centrally.

Let's not forget that Eriksen & Dele both played wide for us at times, particularly Dele as he would then break from wide to get on the end of balls over the top.

  1. What does a wide player typically do in this day and age of wide players having dozens of different types of roles to perform? Some score goals. Some play crosses from deep. Some get to the byline and cross. Some drift into striker positions to score. Some drift into the middle to create. Some are there to protect the full back. Some are there as target men to bully smaller full backs. Etc. Etc. I’ve never said Brooks is is a winger. I’ve said that it’s wrong to call him a central player when he’s almost always played out wide.
  2. You may see an AMC playing out wide, but he’s not. Eriksen was. Dele too occasionally. Modric before we trusted him centrally. Agreed Brooks isn’t whipping in crosses, but he is beating his man a lot, and with some ease at that, and carrying the ball long distances down the flanks at pace.
Here’s his heatmap for this season:


He’s not a winger. He is a wide player.
 

Attachments

  • FE59A64F-435C-4E98-A3B0-75DF6F995FE0.jpeg
    FE59A64F-435C-4E98-A3B0-75DF6F995FE0.jpeg
    126.1 KB · Views: 99

JonnySpurs

SC Veteran
Jun 4, 2004
5,346
12,398
  1. What does a wide player typically do in this day and age of wide players having dozens of different types of roles to perform? Some score goals. Some play crosses from deep. Some get to the byline and cross. Some drift into striker positions to score. Some drift into the middle to create. Some are there to protect the full back. Some are there as target men to bully smaller full backs. Etc. Etc. I’ve never said Brooks is is a winger. I’ve said that it’s wrong to call him a central player when he’s almost always played out wide.
  2. You may see an AMC playing out wide, but he’s not. Eriksen was. Dele too occasionally. Modric before we trusted him centrally. Agreed Brooks isn’t whipping in crosses, but he is beating his man a lot, and with some ease at that, and carrying the ball long distances down the flanks at pace.
Here’s his heatmap for this season:


He’s not a winger. He is a wide player.

Dude, look, it's all good. I don't want to have a big old debate. You're basing a lot of your view on his previous stats of him playing out wide for Bournemouth as he has repeatedly done that and that's fair enough.

I believe that was a move by Eddie Howe to utilise him in a particular way because Brooks is talented, versatile, quick and skilful but ultimately I think he will end up as a central attacking midfielder. I might be wrong but he was considered that type of player at Sheff Utd iirc, Spurs were linked with him at the time.

Take Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain as a perfect example of how he was playing centrally for Saints as young player, then he moved to Arsenal and because he had speed and skill, Wenger put him out wide. He did fine but wasn't exactly an elite player in his position. He's then moved to Liverpool and is now back playing centrally again, which he prefers and he seems to be flourishing. At one stage he was scoring pretty much every game.

Anyway, I just want us to sign him.
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,890
130,524
This reminds me of the 'Davinson Sanchez can play right-back' stuff.
 

King of the Lane

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2010
4,117
23,670
One thing that is very apparent to me is when people say he would be the perfect Eriksen replacement or he plays like Grealish etc...either people have only watched youtube highlights or MOTD because he is nothing like either of them. I wonder how many of our fans have actually watched him or are they just jumping on the bandwagon
 

cliff jones

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,080
6,598
What I like about Brooks is he’s intelligent, finds space with off the ball movement and can shoot even of his wrong un- we need to have more efforts on target.

Chases back and presses well, too.

Erik out, Brooks in
 

bbunc

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2019
1,562
6,610
What I like about Brooks is he’s intelligent, finds space with off the ball movement and can shoot even of his wrong un- we need to have more efforts on target.

Chases back and presses well, too.

Erik out, Brooks in

This is correct. He’s a younger, better and more homegrown Lamela.

A little less shithousery and a little less psycho in the tackle, but better vision and more effective going forward. Actually has another foot.

Would make this “trade” in a heartbeat.
 

PrettyColors

Rosie47 Fan
Aug 13, 2011
3,866
10,074
It does say a lot about our CM recruitment that we are trying to mold this kid to being a diamond in the rough central attacking midfielder. You look at the fees being touted for Havertz, Aouar, or even our own N'Dombele and it makes you wonder: are there any affordable, viable AMs who play through the center? Eriksen was truly unique, he ticked every single box of versatility, technique, work-rate, and vision. Eze and Brooks definitely miss out on the defensive work rate and long passing.
 

allpaths

Well-Known Member
Oct 31, 2014
3,177
8,388
It does say a lot about our CM recruitment that we are trying to mold this kid to being a diamond in the rough central attacking midfielder. You look at the fees being touted for Havertz, Aouar, or even our own N'Dombele and it makes you wonder: are there any affordable, viable AMs who play through the center? Eriksen was truly unique, he ticked every single box of versatility, technique, work-rate, and vision. Eze and Brooks definitely miss out on the defensive work rate and long passing.
Eriksen didn't have the workrate until poch's training methods molded him into one. For us to compete we have to project what players could possibly become. Maybe Eze doesn't have the work rate I can't say.

But I've seen a lot of David Brooks and he always tracked back for bournemouth showing he at least has the desire to do his bit. To go along with the rare technical/vision that makes up a top modern #10.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,149
47,892
This is correct. He’s a younger, better and more homegrown Lamela.

A little less shithousery and a little less psycho in the tackle, but better vision and more effective going forward. Actually has another foot.

Would make this “trade” in a heartbeat.
spot on, he's similar to Lamela but a younger homegrown version who can take a free-kick and who has a decent barnet.
 

DiVaio

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2020
4,177
17,419
I don’t think the second “interesting” player that Hercules alluded to from Bournemouth is Brooks. Heard it’s their left back Diego Rico but only if we loan Sessengon out.
it's from some Twitter itk with 10 followers. if we loan Sessegnon out we still have Cirkin
 

Wick3d

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
5,491
11,647
I don’t think the second “interesting” player that Hercules alluded to from Bournemouth is Brooks. Heard it’s their left back Diego Rico but only if we loan Sessengon out.

I never mentioned Hercules's information. :ROFLMAO:
 

George94

George
Feb 1, 2015
3,686
19,500
it's from some Twitter itk with 10 followers. if we loan Sessegnon out we still have Cirkin
I never mentioned Hercules's information. :ROFLMAO:
Diego Rico is 27 and shit, there’s no chance we’d want him.

I’ve deleted my posts now, don’t want to start to rumours over something I haven’t cleared - but yeah, I agree that Rico is average and would obviously much prefer Brooks.
 
Last edited:
Top