Match Threads West Ham vs Spurs
- Thread starter Bulletspur
- Start date
- Date
- Apr 2, 2024
- KO Time
- 8:15 pm
- Score
-
1 - 1
hutchiniho
Top Cat
- Mar 19, 2006
- 4,702
- 5,958
Another strange watch.
Very open at the back, still haven’t sorted out winning corners at both ends of the pitch. Someone must have a plan by now to help Vicario, and then we’re not really creating good scoring opportunities.
All of that with a full strength group of starters although I’m not sure I know our best starting XI.
Very open at the back, still haven’t sorted out winning corners at both ends of the pitch. Someone must have a plan by now to help Vicario, and then we’re not really creating good scoring opportunities.
All of that with a full strength group of starters although I’m not sure I know our best starting XI.
Last edited:
fishhhandaricecake
Well-Known Member
- Nov 15, 2018
- 19,328
- 48,292
Right now I’d say Werner, Son Johnson is usually our best 3, could argue a case for Richy, Son, Johnson also but yea longer term Werner & Kulu should be bench players for us.
Ghost Hardware
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,391
- 63,320
Subs completely killed our momentum. I had wanted Gio to start but I understood why Ange picked Maddison. I wasn’t particularly calling for his sub when he was pulled off but equally considering how well Gio played on sat I wanted to see what he could bring to the table. Bringing on Kulu for Maddison was a very poor move. I get Ange really likes his energy and wants him to be part of his team but this wasn’t the time to try it out considering how off form Kulu has been of late. The subs killed us. Ether keep on Maddison or bring on Gio.
RuskyM
Well-Known Member
- Jul 9, 2011
- 7,123
- 23,450
Genuinely curious as to how bringing on effectively four central players would break a team camped inside 30 yards.
Jamturk
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2008
- 9,919
- 23,025
He's not fit
Bobbins
SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008
- May 5, 2005
- 21,609
- 45,211
That's mainly because, aside from injuries, we've simply refused to play him.
Under Poch and Jose he was a starter and generally performed very well - enough for us to part with masses of cash to bring him in early.
Then we basically just gave him away for free for two years.
Now we've got a situation where the team is in desperate need of creativity and forward passing, and we have once again seemingly regressed to refusing to use him - despite him having consistently performed well when he's played this season.
It's bizarre and it's clearly not going to work out but it makes no sense. If I were Villa/Newcastle/United I'd be all over getting him in the summer.
UbeAstard
Well-Known Member
- May 31, 2005
- 3,380
- 2,449
He certainly is not, hes just overated.
Tonio
Good bloke, thorough professional.
- May 15, 2008
- 3,972
- 6,796
Doesn't matter what the subs were. We were not going to get the winner.
Not fair on Johnson, the problem is he was the one making the crosses
Richys clearly not that fit or he’d of been on earlier
Impspur1
Well-Known Member
- May 8, 2014
- 2,342
- 5,817
No plan…. Really?? I think it’s been pretty clear from game one?
Similar threads
