I was under the impression (but may very well be incorrect) that we have a buy-back clause unrelated to his contract. So although he obviously has a minimum fee release clause like all players in Portugal and Spain are required to have, our own arrangement is independent of/in addition to that.
I can understand why the club might have felt that Champions League games were a painful inclusion, so I don't understand why they don't just make it 2 domestic cup games. They'd almost certainly be against lower league opposition, so you'd only be filling a stadium for games you'd struggle to...
This is what happens when people tell the club they are happy about something in a survey!
'What do you think of the concession pricing at the new stadium'?'
I don't care if it's pie and a pint for 50p, always say too high!
@LexingtonSpurs, what's with the ratings. You've offered nothing that provides any kind of evidence that I'm either wrong or puts together a more plausible argument. I've literally been first hand involved in a naming rights deal (much lower level, admittedly) so I understand how they work...
Daniel Levy has already said, publicly, on camera, that the NFL wanted a deal in which the stadium could be handed over to them 'clean' and said that worked in a similar fashion to UEFA competition. This isn't something I have randomly made up!
The difference is, NFL franchises are all involved...
On this subject. The stadium will be known as Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in the NFL regardless of whether we get a sponsor, so we get that benefit regardless.
Didn't realise the Championship's rules around shirt sponsorship were so relaxed. You simply wouldn't be able to have anything like this in the PL, there are strict rules around size and placement. (Europe's are even stricter, if you look carefully, you will note the AIA logo on our European...
We've put it on the side of our new stadium in enormous concrete letters. We're definitely leaning towards the English version but we've not binned the Latin. On the away kit is exactly the kind of time we would use it when using the English on the home. Makes perfect sense.
This is a fake, it may be based on the real third, but it's a definite fake. I've seen it in the flesh, there's a whole load of clues.
We never have an embroidered badge (since Nike took over, because they don't do that). The embroidery is also really poor quality.
The PL logos (not visible)...
This has been discussed. There isn't. The stadium sponsorship is linked to the sleeve, not the main shirt sponsorship. Levy has said this before and it's the train we don't yet have a sleeve sponsor.
The club made a series of these for companies they were courting for sponsorship to make it 'real'. There was a picture of one with Uber Stadium on it. Whilst I'm not saying this isn't possible, there is more than one of these floating around and it certainly isn't proof that a deal has been done.
I've replied on this before. Companies, particularly larger ones always have brand rules, in terms of how/where their brand can be used, the specific colour palate and other things like spacing in relation to other logos and marks.
Most brands have a coloured logo/name which is the standard for...
I saw someone in a very obvious fake based on this design on the way home from Turkey on Friday. But there's always fakes made based on rumoured designs, so I don't think it means anything.
All this talk about the AIA shirt sponsorship in relation to the stadium seems a bit misguided to me. We can be much more rational and less emotive about it by considering what we know...
I'd say there's almost no chance of it changing during the length of the AIA deal. There's some clear...
A reminder to those browsing without an account, it's quick and easy to Register Here. Come and join the fun!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.