Quite a few of us on here didn't want him to go and said so often enough.Why are people trying to rewrite history? I don't seem to remember many people objecting to him going out on loan given how poor he had been.
Unfortunately the critics tend to shout louder so most of us only remember him getting slated on a fairly regular occurrence.Quite a few of us on here didn't want him to go and said so often enough.
Sell Lennon AND Townsend, problem solved.
Quite a few of us on here didn't want him to go and said so often enough.
He'd gone stale because of idiotic "football philosophy"I think he'd gone stale at Spurs for whatever reason. I've always liked him so hope he has discovered his mojo - be that for us for another team.
There was some ITK I seem to recall from Trix on COYS saying that he had more than likely burnt his bridges and wouldn't be coming back - and not just with the manager but we shall see.
He'd gone stale because of idiotic "football philosophy"
Also known as belligerently ploughing on with a plan that doesn't work.
The cost of that was no width in our team under AVB or MOPO. Lennon gets cast aside and becomes, at best, a bit part player.
I'd hold both AVB and MoPo very responsible for that.
I have no doubt at all that he'll shine playing week in week out elsewhere.
So who's stupid enough to say they were wrong and we shouldn't of got rid of him?
So why was he shit under Sherwood and in Redknapp's last 2 seasons then?He'd gone stale because of idiotic "football philosophy"
Also known as belligerently ploughing on with a plan that doesn't work.
The cost of that was no width in our team under AVB or MOPO. Lennon gets cast aside and becomes, at best, a bit part player.
I'd hold both AVB and MoPo very responsible for that.
I have no doubt at all that he'll shine playing week in week out elsewhere.
To say that Lennon was shit under Redknapp is unfair and pure revisionist history. Do you not remember how deadly we were with Lennon and Bale on the wings providing width, and getting on the end of Modric and VDV's passes? Do you forget who torched the AC Milan defense, and provided the assist to Crouch for our only goal to advance us in the CL? Do you forget how terrible our play when Lennon was out of the lineup, and Redknapp put Modric or VDV out on the right wing?So why was he shit under Sherwood and in Redknapp's last 2 seasons then?
Getting on the end of Modric & VDV's passes and doing fuck all with it.To say that Lennon was shit under Redknapp is unfair and pure revisionist history. Do you not remember how deadly we were with Lennon and Bale on the wings providing width, and getting on the end of Modric and VDV's passes? Do you forget who torched the AC Milan defense, and provided the assist to Crouch for our only goal to advance us in the CL? Do you forget how terrible our play when Lennon was out of the lineup, and Redknapp put Modric or VDV out on the right wing?
NoFYP.
Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.
We dont seem to better off with their replacements, Fazio and Stambouli. 21 million spent and only Dier improves the first team. I dont see Stambouli doing anything that Livermore couldn't do.FYP.
Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.
FYP.
Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.
FYP.
Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.
I still would have taken Hudd over Capoue this season but then I guess Hudd didn't make a through ball against the Chicago Fire and have 90% pass accuracy against Toronto FC.
Hudd can't run. Which is pretty useless for a manager who wants to play a hard pressing game.