What's new

Aaron Lennon needs to start

poc

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2004
3,241
3,656
Why are people trying to rewrite history? I don't seem to remember many people objecting to him going out on loan given how poor he had been.
Quite a few of us on here didn't want him to go and said so often enough.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,401
38,409
Quite a few of us on here didn't want him to go and said so often enough.
Unfortunately the critics tend to shout louder so most of us only remember him getting slated on a fairly regular occurrence.
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
8,975
25,090
I think he'd gone stale at Spurs for whatever reason. I've always liked him so hope he has discovered his mojo - be that for us for another team.

There was some ITK I seem to recall from Trix on COYS saying that he had more than likely burnt his bridges and wouldn't be coming back - and not just with the manager but we shall see.
 

rabbikeane

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2005
6,916
12,744
Quite a few of us on here didn't want him to go and said so often enough.


And you were wrong in doing so as Lennon needed this new challenge to perform again.
Question is whether we bring him back in the summer or not, that's up for debate.
 

TottenhamMattSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
10,925
16,007
I think he'd gone stale at Spurs for whatever reason. I've always liked him so hope he has discovered his mojo - be that for us for another team.

There was some ITK I seem to recall from Trix on COYS saying that he had more than likely burnt his bridges and wouldn't be coming back - and not just with the manager but we shall see.
He'd gone stale because of idiotic "football philosophy"

Also known as belligerently ploughing on with a plan that doesn't work.

The cost of that was no width in our team under AVB or MOPO. Lennon gets cast aside and becomes, at best, a bit part player.
I'd hold both AVB and MoPo very responsible for that.
I have no doubt at all that he'll shine playing week in week out elsewhere.
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
8,975
25,090
He'd gone stale because of idiotic "football philosophy"

Also known as belligerently ploughing on with a plan that doesn't work.

The cost of that was no width in our team under AVB or MOPO. Lennon gets cast aside and becomes, at best, a bit part player.
I'd hold both AVB and MoPo very responsible for that.
I have no doubt at all that he'll shine playing week in week out elsewhere.

Perhaps so but he has been stale for quite a long time now. Whatever the reasoning I think the loan has been good for him. I'm not convinced he will shine wek in week out but time will tell. I've always liked him as a player so hope he does improve.
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,888
34,301
He'd gone stale because of idiotic "football philosophy"

Also known as belligerently ploughing on with a plan that doesn't work.

The cost of that was no width in our team under AVB or MOPO. Lennon gets cast aside and becomes, at best, a bit part player.
I'd hold both AVB and MoPo very responsible for that.
I have no doubt at all that he'll shine playing week in week out elsewhere.
So why was he shit under Sherwood and in Redknapp's last 2 seasons then?
 

formlesswater

Member
Jun 22, 2012
117
186
So why was he shit under Sherwood and in Redknapp's last 2 seasons then?
To say that Lennon was shit under Redknapp is unfair and pure revisionist history. Do you not remember how deadly we were with Lennon and Bale on the wings providing width, and getting on the end of Modric and VDV's passes? Do you forget who torched the AC Milan defense, and provided the assist to Crouch for our only goal to advance us in the CL? Do you forget how terrible our play when Lennon was out of the lineup, and Redknapp put Modric or VDV out on the right wing?
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,888
34,301
To say that Lennon was shit under Redknapp is unfair and pure revisionist history. Do you not remember how deadly we were with Lennon and Bale on the wings providing width, and getting on the end of Modric and VDV's passes? Do you forget who torched the AC Milan defense, and provided the assist to Crouch for our only goal to advance us in the CL? Do you forget how terrible our play when Lennon was out of the lineup, and Redknapp put Modric or VDV out on the right wing?
Getting on the end of Modric & VDV's passes and doing fuck all with it.

That was a great assist for Crouch, but the odd good game doesn't make him a good player in that time. In that CL year, he had 3 goals and 3 assists in 34 games in the league. To put that in perspective, Huddlestone scored 2 assisted 2 in 14 that year. Lennon should be more productive as a winger than a DM.
 

Mullers

Unknown member
Jan 4, 2006
25,914
16,413
FYP.

Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.
We dont seem to better off with their replacements, Fazio and Stambouli. 21 million spent and only Dier improves the first team. I dont see Stambouli doing anything that Livermore couldn't do.
 

JerryGarcia

Dark star crashes...
May 18, 2006
8,694
16,028
FYP.

Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.

I still would have taken Hudd over Capoue this season but then I guess Hudd didn't make a through ball against the Chicago Fire and have 90% pass accuracy against Toronto FC.
 

Main Man

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2013
2,314
1,699
FYP.

Probably the same idiots who were saying we would be better off with Huddlestone, Dawson and Livermore earlier in the season.

I am not sure if I am an idiot, but those three you have mentioned are no worse than any of the players we replaced them with.

Not in a million years.
 

JUSTINSIGNAL

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2008
15,996
48,596
I still would have taken Hudd over Capoue this season but then I guess Hudd didn't make a through ball against the Chicago Fire and have 90% pass accuracy against Toronto FC.

Hudd can't run. Which is pretty useless for a manager who wants to play a hard pressing game.
 

Main Man

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2013
2,314
1,699
Hudd can't run. Which is pretty useless for a manager who wants to play a hard pressing game.

But we don't play a hard pressing game?

We have pressed hard in about three games and people translate that to mean a full season.

We pressed more under Sherwood, AVB and Harry in general.
 

Mullers

Unknown member
Jan 4, 2006
25,914
16,413
Lennon was going to be replaced during the Ramos era, the whole purpose of signing Bentley was that he could cross and shoot but Bentley's attitude was all wrong so Lennon won that battle.
 
Top