JUSTINSIGNAL
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2008
- 15,996
- 48,596
He's really not that good. He needs about 15 chances to score 1 goal and his link up play is average at best.
Christian Benteke
- Thread starter nedley
- Start date
I don't see Villa selling him, they really need him right now and they would definitely want profit on the 7.5 million they spent on him. I'd like to see how he performs for the remainder of this season and next season, to see if he is the real deal.
gibbospurs
SC Supporter
- Aug 28, 2010
- 4,985
- 6,608
he has just turned 22. he is hardly the finished article. scored some good goals, missed some sitters. Certainly will get better imo!
Spursking
Well-Known Member
- May 16, 2004
- 5,431
- 2,457
Who would stay at Villa now? They probably have the most boring team in the league. N'Zogbia and Benteke the only good players left there.
Montasura
Well-Known Member
- Mar 15, 2008
- 7,256
- 6,768
To answer your question...players who are under contract and that the club do now want to sell.
Spursking
Well-Known Member
- May 16, 2004
- 5,431
- 2,457
I understand that, but if we came in with a good offer, they have to consider it, and the player would like to come, I guess.
Yid-ol
Just-outside Edinburgh
- Jan 16, 2006
- 31,158
- 19,387
it just seems so easy when you put it like this.
lets buy messi and ronaldo as well, i cant see it being a problem.
Spursking
Well-Known Member
- May 16, 2004
- 5,431
- 2,457
WBA have Lukaku on loan now. If we put in a bid, we could get it accepted.
Benteke is a player we have a chance to get. We also have belgian players at the club.
Cannot compare it with Ronaldo and Messi. What is that?
Montasura
Well-Known Member
- Mar 15, 2008
- 7,256
- 6,768
Actually no, they are under no obligation to consider any offer unless there is a buy out clause.
only1waddle
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2012
- 8,202
- 12,389
Would Chelsea really sell Lukaku to us? his initial fee was £13m rising to £18m, as you are all about good value for money SK, what would you value Lukaku at?
Spursking
Well-Known Member
- May 16, 2004
- 5,431
- 2,457
If they don't consider an offer, the player will be upset, and that is a bad move for the club anyway. In cases like that, the player can put in a transer request.
Yid-ol
Just-outside Edinburgh
- Jan 16, 2006
- 31,158
- 19,387
we have more chance of getting a bid accepted by Barca or Real than Chelsea selling a player to us.
Villa will probably want 15 million for Beneteke because this is England and they'd want to make a profit. I am sure you'd agree that doesn't represent good value and there is no way Levy will pay that.
Spursking
Well-Known Member
- May 16, 2004
- 5,431
- 2,457
Good question. It is not easy to value him based on the previous transfer fee, but he is a long term striker option, and is worth at least £13 mill. That should not be a problem for us. I don't know if Chelsea would be eager to sell, though.....
chrissivad
Staff
- May 20, 2005
- 51,646
- 58,072
- Staff
- #38
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...give-Andre-Villas-Boas-Chelsea-treatment.html
doesnt matter if Chelsea accept though, cant se the player wanting to join
Montasura
Well-Known Member
- Mar 15, 2008
- 7,256
- 6,768
Hmmm, let me remind you of one Luka Modric...wanted to leave...club refused to sell...player had another great season with no transfer request handed in. You do realise that if a player hands in a request they then lose out on a fair bit of money. So much so that transfer requests being handed in doesn't happen that often. Benteke has only just arrived at Villa...why in the good name of fuck would they honestly want to sell him, especially considering the situation they are in since he could literally make the difference between survival or relegation.
Life just does not work as simply as your brain does!!
Benteke has been decent, but there is no point trying to buy him now - still quite a risk imo and won't be on the cheap as villa need him.
--> Better off making a bid in the summer, especially if they get relegated! I don't believe he will offer much more than defoe / dempsey / ade at the moment.
--> Lukaka is HIGHLY unlikely imo - he hes been reported to be happy at WBA and wants to go on loan there again next season potentially. Secondly chelsea payed a lot for him and as he is developing well, why would they sell him to one of their rivals offering a lowball offer?
--> Better off making a bid in the summer, especially if they get relegated! I don't believe he will offer much more than defoe / dempsey / ade at the moment.
--> Lukaka is HIGHLY unlikely imo - he hes been reported to be happy at WBA and wants to go on loan there again next season potentially. Secondly chelsea payed a lot for him and as he is developing well, why would they sell him to one of their rivals offering a lowball offer?
Similar threads
