- Dec 5, 2006
- 2,623
- 9,599
There is a verbal agreement for Juan Foyth to go on loan for one year and with a purchase option to Villarreal.
The only thing that remains is the final OK of the owner of Tottenham.
I would just keep Foyth if we don't get Skriniar then
I’d assume the hope is that with a year of football under his belt, a few more international caps and hopefully a less depressed market, his sell value with one year on his deal will be higher than it currently is with two years.Wish we would have extended his contract prior to this. Even if he sets La Liga alight, he'll only have 1 year left on his contract come next summer (as far as I can tell), limiting his value if he is still not in Mourinho's plans at that point.
I’d assume the hope is that with a year of football under his belt, a few more international caps and hopefully a less depressed market, his sell value with one year on his deal will be higher than it currently is with two years.
Its a shame in many ways, i like Foyth and probably didnt get a fair crack of the whip but defo wish him well. However i do query the fee of only £13.5M, i hope the deal has a sell on clause appended to it
Can’t have it both ways when we’re getting more established players in Højbjerg and Doherty for the dance kind of price range and have just committed only £3m for a year of Vinicius.Its a shame in many ways, i like Foyth and probably didnt get a fair crack of the whip but defo wish him well. However i do query the fee of only £13.5M, i hope the deal has a sell on clause appended to it
Covid is upon us, we can't demand the same fees as before, we need to free up the non-hg slots.
Can’t have it both ways when we’re getting more established players in Højbjerg and Doherty for the dance kind of price range and have just committed only £3m for a year of Vinicius.
Yes Vinicius does have that option, but the initial outlay is peanuts. If you’re implying that potential (which is highly subjective anyway) is worth more than proven finished product, I have to say I absolutely disagree.I hear you and not wanting to be greedy in the sense of have my cake an eat it as to say, its just being honest about the value/ value in potential of the guy, hence the sell on clause so the fee can be low initially. Given a proper run of games and a chance he will bloom
Hojberg we had the upper hand due to him being in the last yr of a contract and him stating he wouldnt sign a new one, thats standard in football regardless of covid, we got lucky yes but thats nothing to do with the covid climate
Doherty is 28 (29 in January) he has found his level, he is not going to improve in terms of potential, and the fact Mendes has helped the deal / JM again is nothing to do with covid climate as would happen without it.
Vicinius has option of circa 41M EURO so its not the same.