- Jan 9, 2014
- 14,914
- 26,616
Well...the idea is, now I'm not saying the idea works well at this point because we have a thin squad of squeezed players, but the idea is that to reduce the time spent in-game on re-organising between defensive and attacking systems. Rather than winning the ball - re-organising the team - attacking - dropping the ball - re-organising the team - defending and so on and so forth, the idea is to contain the shape proactively so that all that time organising the team is reduced, and it looks more like defend - attack - defend - attack without intermediary steps of obtaining various shapes and structures. Now, it's easy to say but hard to do, because it presupposes a certain level of excellence throughout that just isn't present.a) The thing is though this way of playing doesn't conserve energy, I also don't think it's any less intense than Poch's. Everyone is expected to get in behind the ball, have to keep shuffling about and tracking and staying organised, so physically are using energy, mentally this is tiring too, and then certain players like Moura, Alli, Bergwijn etc. are then expected as soon as we win the ball to hurtle forward length of the pitch, then when we lose it get back in behind the ball again. Trust me, that is really fucking tiring to be doing that over and over and over.
Once again well ... the idea is to press. It's a different way of pressing than having Lamela stress the opponent high up the pitch until they lose the ball and both teams must start over. It's a sort of a press that aims at winning the ball back at a time when the opponent is unstable, not when they still are stable in their defensive shape.One of the things I did notice yesterday was the almost complete lack of pressing in their half for a good hour. Yes that concerns me as much as anyone, and if we are seeing the same come November, then questions need to be answered or a change will need to inevitably be made.
Last edited: