What's new

Match Ratings Ratings v Chelsea

MOTM


  • Total voters
    134

poc

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2004
3,241
3,656
Sissoko, did nothing wrong covered shit loads of ground came out of the game well considering.
 

dricha1

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2005
1,312
2,584
Decent. Sanchez, Winks, Sissoko, Kane, Lamela

The rest were p*ss poor

Don’t understand Poch’s tactics with Regards rotation....drops Sanchez against physical opponents (Burnley) and the constant fullback rotation is over done I think.....none of them get any rhythm...neither get to find any kind of form...
 

nedley

John Duncan's Love Child
Jul 28, 2006
13,969
28,103
I thought Winks played well.

Kane did well 1st half. Non existent in the 2nd.

Sanchez and Toby come out with some credit as does Sissoko and to an extent Coco.

Son was abysmal and Eriksen was quite frankly a disgrace.

Our FB are shit and we know that.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
Fullbacks, Hugo, son, and eriksen especially were diabolical.
Hauntingly bad .

The rest were just meh
 

DiscoD1882

SC Supporter
Mar 27, 2006
6,961
14,754
Tonight I will be doing a reverse man of the match.

Therefore. By a country mile Tripper wins.

Special mention for Eriksen, Davies and Lloris as well.

The rest were bang average.
 

dk-yid

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2011
4,489
8,020
Sissoko for me. Never stoppesd running and challenging. Was one of just a few who showed heart.

Worst game by far in A Spurs kit from Eriksen.
 

trasores

Butterfly chicken
Feb 20, 2006
836
804
Pochettino annoys me with his change for changes sake.

Kane back too early has disrupted the balance

Son couldn't control the ball

Lloris 2 did nothing
Trippier 2
Sanchez 6 did ok
Toby 6 - good until the goal
Davies 3
Winks 5
Eriksen 4 just not interested
Sissoko 4 old school sissoko
Lamela 5 - tries had just not enough quality
Son 4 looks out of sorts
Kane 6 worked hard but looked rusty

Llorente 3 not an impact player
Moira NET
Rose 7 - took no shit from Pedro

Poch 3
 

agrdavidsfan

Ledley's Knee!
Aug 25, 2005
10,918
13,352
Lloris 4 - big game one mistake again sadly not good enough

Trippier n/a awful

Sanchez 7 - done well vs higuain and the rest

Toby - 6 great until he let Pedro cut in

Davies - 4 is there any point to him going forward? As it just means he’s further out of position to get back.

Winks 5 - can’t remeber one forward pass with any momentum all game from him lost the ball on a number of occasions in tight areas

Eriksen 2 - think he was gutted he couldn’t watch el Classico so decided to down tools

Son 3 - tried and tried but nothing would come off for him except constant ball loss

Lamela 3 - see above

Sissoko 6 - tried hard couldn’t do anything about either of the goals we know what he is he knows what he is can’t expect him to be a creative dynamo he’s not that player.

Kane - 3 annoyed at him done everything except actually Focus on his own game never seen him so annoyed or angry for no reason during a game
 

whitesocks

The past means nothing. This is a message for life
Jan 16, 2014
4,652
5,738
Davies didn't look that bad after his injury break.
Lamela got stuck in before vanishing.
Actually it could have been Sissoko, but I'm not allowed to change my vote.
Grim.
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
Son was awful today - every touch bounced off him, same could be said of every other player.

I thought our central defenders played well today. Everyone else was pretty shit and diabolical.
 

Oh Teddy Teddy

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2017
5,212
12,333
Lloris 5 - done too easily for the first goal; gave it pedro earlier in the game; tripp’s at fault for second

Tripper 3 - he has to go

Sanchez 6 - solid

Alderweireld 5 - mostly solid, then fucked it

Davies 5 - played about as well as he can tbh

Winks/Sissoko 6 - thought both did a good job. Not a lot they can do about the shite in front of them

Eriksen 4 - waste of space out there

Lamela 5 - puts the effort in, but didn’t happen

Son 5 - see above

Kane 5 - see above

Subs - all shit, Rose should have been on earlier

Boo.
 

St José Dominguez

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2014
3,592
11,648
Winks and Sissoko did relatively well despite result.

I thought Sanchez had a good game and Toby would’ve done too apart from too easily being beaten for goal.

Lloris another poor game to add to his list this season.

Davies as vanilla as always and Trippier as useless as always. Wish Poch would just start KWP and Rose for rest of season but he’ll keep rotating with KWP only maybe starting last game of season.

Kane was decent 1st half but faded.

Thought Son was awful overall, his first touch really poor.

Lamela did Lamela things, donkey work but offering nothing in final third.

Thought the Llorente sub ended any chances we had of getting result.

We looked so tepid and lacking energy. Thought it was a cowardly performance overall and I think Poch’s estimates of 5-10 years off winning league massively optimistic, try 100.
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
Lloris 4 He's a liability when he kicks the ball. Great shot stopper but Jesus jave a word.
Sanchez 6 Did ok.
Toby 5 Not a bad game but defending for goal was schoolboy.
Davies 6 Did ok.
Trippier 1 Well....
Winks 4 Slows us down and all sideways and backwards. Needs to speed it up and get the ball forward more.
Sissoko 6 Did ok.
Son, Eriksen, Lamela, Kane 5. This did not work. Imo there was simply no width, we were too narrow and all of them just kept getting in each others way. There was no space. Eriksen was so poor it was ridiculous that he wasnt first to be subbed.

Imo we're just making too many wholesale changes every game. You have absolutely no idea whos gonna be playing where from 1 game to the next or what formation. That doesnt help any defence or attack imo.
 

werty

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2005
25,101
26,360
Same old, same old. Not going to go into depth because I'm fed up of repeating myself. We're just too predictable in our attacking play. I was happy with started with a 4231 (why Eriksen in the middle and Lamela on the right though?), and although we didn't have the best of starts, I was disappointed we changed so quickly. We had a good five minutes after the change, and another after their first goal, but overall we were poor. Their first was aided because of the diamond, although Alderweireld's defending was baaaad.


Lloris 4 - Big match Hugo. I don't blame him for the first, but I'd give him more of the blame for the second than Trippier. He can see the play unfolding and didn't communicate with him. His kicking was poor and decision making too.

Trippier 6 - Other than the mistake, which Lloris deserves his share of the blame, he played well. Defended well. Use of the ball wasn't the best, but it was better than most.
Sanchez 7 - Had one moment where he fell asleep that Alderweireld covered well for, but other than that he was good.
Alderweireld 6 - Play well other than his mistake, but that was a terrible moment. Pedro did nothing to create the chance for himself.
Davies 6 - Fine. Didn't offer much going forward but defended well for the most part.

Sissoko 6 - One of the few who played to their ability. Doubled up well when Lamela refused to help out when we were in a 4231 at the start.
Winks 5 - Would be surprised if he made a forward pass over 10 yards. Slow with the ball and got lucky with some errant passes.

Lamela 5 - Just not good enough for us.
Eriksen 5 - One great moment of quality, but poor overall. Wished he'd play from the right.
Son 5 - Lost count of the amount of times he lost control of the ball.

Kane 6 - Battled but had little to work with and was slow with the ball himself.
 

stov

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,353
6,112
Same old, same old. Not going to go into depth because I'm fed up of repeating myself. We're just too predictable in our attacking play. I was happy with started with a 4231 (why Eriksen in the middle and Lamela on the right though?), and although we didn't have the best of starts, I was disappointed we changed so quickly. We had a good five minutes after the change, and another after their first goal, but overall we were poor. Their first was aided because of the diamond, although Alderweireld's defending was baaaad.


Lloris 4 - Big match Hugo. I don't blame him for the first, but I'd give him more of the blame for the second than Trippier. He can see the play unfolding and didn't communicate with him. His kicking was poor and decision making too.

Trippier 6 - Other than the mistake, which Lloris deserves his share of the blame, he played well. Defended well. Use of the ball wasn't the best, but it was better than most.
Sanchez 7 - Had one moment where he fell asleep that Alderweireld covered well for, but other than that he was good.
Alderweireld 6 - Play well other than his mistake, but that was a terrible moment. Pedro did nothing to create the chance for himself.
Davies 6 - Fine. Didn't offer much going forward but defended well for the most part.

Sissoko 6 - One of the few who played to their ability. Doubled up well when Lamela refused to help out when we were in a 4231 at the start.
Winks 5 - Would be surprised if he made a forward pass over 10 yards. Slow with the ball and got lucky with some errant passes.

Lamela 5 - Just not good enough for us.
Eriksen 5 - One great moment of quality, but poor overall. Wished he'd play from the right.
Son 5 - Lost count of the amount of times he lost control of the ball.

Kane 6 - Battled but had little to work with and was slow with the ball himself.

Trippier higher rating than half the team?

He was very poor in the second half after an ok first half. No way he was better than winks.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,277
57,634
When Eriksen doesn't turn up we look incapable of creating anything. The own goal was beyond abysmal. Need to sort this shit out pronto if we want a top 4 finish.
 

synththfc

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2017
3,740
26,716
If Trippier is the answer, I don't want to know the question.

Unless the question is "Who's the worst fullback in the division?"
 
Top